| Literature DB >> 33993488 |
Mariana Bohns Michalowski1,2,3, Daiane Keller Cecconello1,2,3, Mecneide Mendes Lins4, Maria do Perpétuo Socorro Sampaio Carvalho5, Klerize Anecely de Souza Silva6, Lilian Cristofani7, Thais Alcantra Bonilha8, Bianca Faustini Baglioli9, Mara Albonei Dudeque Pianovski10, Ana Paula Kuczynski11, Pablo Santiago12, Ciliana Rechenmacher1,2, Ana Paula Alegretti3, Karla Rodrigues3, Mariana Rodrigues de Magalhães3, Liane Esteves Daudt1,2,3.
Abstract
Our group recently showed that the (ASNase) formulation available in Brazil from 2017 to 2018 when used at the same dose and frequency as the formulation provided previously did not reach the activity considered therapeutic. Based on these, our goal was to assess the impact of these facts on the prognosis of children with ALL at different oncology centers. A multicentre retrospective observational study followed by a prospective follow-up. Patients aged >1 and <18 years in first-line treatment followed up at 10 referral centres, between 2014 and 2018 who received the formulation Leuginase® were identified (Group B). For each patient, the centre registered 2 patients who received ASNase in the presentation of Aginasa® exclusively (Group A). Data collection was registered using (Redcap® ). A total of 419 patients were included; 282 in Group A and 137 in B. Group A had a 3-year OS and EFS of 91·8% and 84·8% respectively, while Group B had a 3-year OS of 83·8% (P = 0·003) and EFS of 76·1% (P = 0·008). There was an impact on 3-year OS and EFS of children who received a formulation. This result highlights the importance of evaluating ASNase and monitoring its activity.Entities:
Keywords: activity; acute lymphocytic leukemia; asparaginase; children; multicenter
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 33993488 DOI: 10.1111/bjh.17494
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Br J Haematol ISSN: 0007-1048 Impact factor: 6.998