| Literature DB >> 33993329 |
Julian Pohlan1, Carsten Stelbrink2, Matthias Pumberger3, Dominik Deppe2, Friederike Schömig3, Nils Hecht4, Friedemann Göhler2, Bernd Hamm2, Torsten Diekhoff2.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To analyze the two major components of the intervertebral disc (IVD) in an ex vivo phantom, as well as age-related changes in patients.Entities:
Keywords: Chondroitin sulfates; Collagen; Intervertebral disc; Spine; Tomography, X-ray Computed
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 33993329 PMCID: PMC8589800 DOI: 10.1007/s00330-021-08028-z
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Eur Radiol ISSN: 0938-7994 Impact factor: 5.315
Fig. 1Flow chart of patient selection. We retrospectively included patients from four separate studies who underwent CT and MRI for different indications. Specifically, we included patients who underwent CT-guided infiltration (n = 14), patients with axial spondyloarthritis (n = 75), patients with osteoporotic vertebral fractures (n = 68), and patients with suspected septic spondylodiscitis (n = 25), totaling n = 182. All reasons for exclusion are provided
Fig. 2Results of density measurements in the phantom. Attenuation in HU for collagen and chondroitin sulfate at different concentrations measured in 120 kVe-equivalent and cMap reconstructions. Attenuation shows a steady increase with the concentration, which is more pronounced for chondroitin sulfate compared with collagen. cMap = collagen/chondroitin map; HU = Hounsfield unit
Level-dependent density in human intervertebral discs
| Levels included | Th12–S1 | L1–L5 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Number of patients | ||||
| Localization | NP | AAF | NP | AAF |
| 135 kVp | ||||
| cMap | ||||
As shown in the left side of the table, statistical analysis with one-way ANOVA identified significantly different disc density of the Th12/L1 and L5/S1 levels for both nucleus pulposus and anterior anulus fibrosus compared with the levels in between. Upon exclusion of Th12/L1 and L5/S1, shown in the right side of the table, there was no significant difference between intervertebral disc levels L1–L5 with regard to density at 135 kVp and in cMaps
NP nucleus pulposus, AAF anterior anulus fibrosus
Fig. 3Morphology of intervertebral discs in different age groups. Age-dependent morphology of intervertebral discs in three patients of different ages: first column, aged 22: density of NP, 89.5 HU, and AAF, 100.5 HU at 135 kVp; NP, 113.8 HU, and AAF, 132.1 HU in cMap; second column, aged 55: density of NP, 77.1 HU, and AAF, 101.4 HU at 135 kVp; NP, 99.6 HU, and AAF, 107.0 HU in cMap; and third column, aged 90 years: density of NP, 66.9 HU, and AAF, 76.6 HU at 135 kVp; NP, 56.7 HU, and AAF, 85.0 HU in cMap. Images show sagittal DECT cMaps with corresponding sagittal CT scans; below, T1-weighted MR images and T2-weighted STIR images are shown. DECT = dual-energy computed tomography; MRI = magnetic resonance imaging
Fig. 4Age-dependent cMap density and MR intensity of human intervertebral discs. Density of normal-appearing intervertebral disc (IVD) compartments measured in conventional 135-kVp images and cMaps in correlation with patient age. There is no significant correlation in 135-kVp images for the NP (p = 0.65), whereas cMaps show significant correlation (p = 0.02; Pearson’s r = − 0.2). Conversely, 135-kVp images show a significant correlation of HU with age in the AAF (p = 0.002; r = − 0.27) and an even stronger correlation in the cMaps (p < 0.001; r = − 0.43), suggesting an added value of these reconstructions. The MRI intensities of IVD compartments are inversely correlated with age. Relative intensities were calculated as IVD ROIs in the sagittal STIR sequence normalized by subtraction of ROIs in the paravertebral musculature. STIR intensity values significantly correlated with age at the AAF with p = < 0.0001; r = − 0.60 (95% CI − 0.70 to − 0.48), and at the NP with p = < 0.0001; r = − 0.74 (95% CI − 0.81 to − 0.66). STIR = short-tau inversion recovery