Literature DB >> 33991757

The role of age in treatment decisions for oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma: Analysis of the National Cancer Database.

Thomas F Barrett1, Angela L Mazul1, Katelyn O Stepan1, C Burton Wood1, Randall C Paniello1, Jose P Zevallos1, Sean Massa1, Ryan S Jackson1, Nicole C Schmitt2, Joseph Zenga3, Stephen Y Kang4, Patrik Pipkorn1, Jason T Rich5, Sidharth V Puram6.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The number of elderly patients with oral squamous cell carcinoma (OCSCC) is increasing as the elderly population increases. Unfortunately, evidence to guide the management of these patients is lacking.
METHODS: Patients with OCSCC identified from the National Cancer Database (NCDB) were stratified into age-based cohorts. Demographics, comorbidities, and treatment patterns were analyzed. Patients were stratified into early stage (Stage I/II) and advanced stage (Stage III/IV) disease. The likelihood of receiving multimodality therapy by age was calculated using multinomial logistic regression for each stratum while controlling for potential confounders. Cox proportional hazard regression was used to calculate 5-year mortality risk while controlling for potential confounders.
RESULTS: Surgery alone or palliative options were offered to older patients more frequently. After controlling for confounders, older patients were less likely to receive multimodality therapy for both early stage and advanced stage disease. Patients with advanced disease across all age cohorts had improved 5-year survival with surgery and adjuvant therapy.
CONCLUSION: Our analyses suggest that elderly patients have unique demographic and pathologic features. They frequently receive less treatment than similarly staged younger patients, yet they benefit from multimodality therapy when feasible. These data suggest an urgent need to critically appraise the care of elderly OCSCC patients within the broader context of their individual comorbidity burden, functional status, and treatment goals.
Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Age-dependent care; Elderly care; Head and neck cancer; Oral cavity cancer; Squamous cell carcinoma; Treatment decision making

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33991757      PMCID: PMC8984992          DOI: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2021.105330

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oral Oncol        ISSN: 1368-8375            Impact factor:   5.972


  37 in total

1.  Head and neck cancer and ageing: a retrospective study in 438 patients.

Authors:  L Barzan; A Veronesi; G Caruso; D Serraino; D Magri; V Zagonel; U Tirelli; R Comoretto; S Monfardini
Journal:  J Laryngol Otol       Date:  1990-08       Impact factor: 1.469

2.  Postoperative concurrent radiotherapy and chemotherapy for high-risk squamous-cell carcinoma of the head and neck.

Authors:  Jay S Cooper; Thomas F Pajak; Arlene A Forastiere; John Jacobs; Bruce H Campbell; Scott B Saxman; Julie A Kish; Harold E Kim; Anthony J Cmelak; Marvin Rotman; Mitchell Machtay; John F Ensley; K S Clifford Chao; Christopher J Schultz; Nancy Lee; Karen K Fu
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2004-05-06       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  Frailty index: Intensive care unit complications in head and neck oncologic regional and free flap reconstruction.

Authors:  Nicholas B Abt; Yanjun Xie; Sidharth V Puram; Jeremy D Richmon; Mark A Varvares
Journal:  Head Neck       Date:  2017-04-27       Impact factor: 3.147

4.  Quality Indicators for Head and Neck Oncologic Surgery: Academic versus Nonacademic Outcomes.

Authors:  Sidharth V Puram; Neil Bhattacharyya
Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2016-06-21       Impact factor: 3.497

5.  Evaluation of the Relationship between Age and Outcome after Microvascular Reconstruction among Patients with Recurrent Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma.

Authors:  Viraj M Patel; Carrie Stern; Amar Miglani; Katie E Weichman; Juan Lin; Thomas J Ow; Evan S Garfein
Journal:  J Reconstr Microsurg       Date:  2017-02-24       Impact factor: 2.873

6.  Priorities, concerns, and regret among patients with head and neck cancer.

Authors:  Melina J Windon; Gypsyamber D'Souza; Farhoud Faraji; Tanya Troy; Wayne M Koch; Christine G Gourin; Ana P Kiess; Karen T Pitman; David W Eisele; Carole Fakhry
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2019-01-15       Impact factor: 6.860

7.  Elderly patients with head and neck cancer: physical, social and psychological aspects after 1 year.

Authors:  Wynia Derks; Rob De Leeuw; Jacques Winnubst; Gerrit Jan Hordijk
Journal:  Acta Otolaryngol       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 1.494

8.  A matched survival analysis for squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck in the elderly.

Authors:  Neil Bhattacharyya
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 3.325

9.  The effect of age on microsurgical free flap outcomes: An analysis of 5,951 cases.

Authors:  Kevin T Jubbal; Dmitry Zavlin; Ahmed Suliman
Journal:  Microsurgery       Date:  2017-06-02       Impact factor: 2.425

10.  Prognostic importance of comorbidity in a hospital-based cancer registry.

Authors:  Jay F Piccirillo; Ryan M Tierney; Irene Costas; Lori Grove; Edward L Spitznagel
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2004-05-26       Impact factor: 56.272

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.