Literature DB >> 33991535

Delivery of oxaliplatin to colorectal cancer cells by folate-targeted UiO-66-NH2.

Alireza Hashemzadeh1, Forouzan Amerizadeh2, Fereshteh Asgharzadeh3, Majid Darroudi4, Amir Avan2, Seyed Mahdi Hassanian5, Mohammad Landarani6, Majid Khazaei7.   

Abstract

Oxaliplatin is being used in different malignancies and several side effects are reported for patients taking Oxaliplatin, including peripheral neuropathy, nausea and vomiting, diarrhea, mouth sores, low blood counts, fatigue, loss of appetite, etc. Here we have developed a targeted anticancer drug delivery system based on folate-conjugated amine-functionalized UiO-66 for the delivery of oxaliplatin (OX). UiO-66-NH2 (U) and UiO-66-NH2-FA(FU) were pre-functionalized by the incorporation of folic acid (FA) into the structure via coordination of the carboxylate group of FA. The FTIR spectra of drug-loaded U and FU showed the presence of new carboxylic and aliphatic groups of OX and FA. Powder X-ray diffraction (PXRD) patterns were matched accordingly with the reference pattern and FESEM results showed semi-spherical particles (115-128 nm). The evaluated amounts of OX in U and FU were calculated 304.5 and 293 mg/g, respectively. The initial burst release of OX was 15.7% per hour for U(OX) and 10.8% per hour for FU(OX). The final release plateau gives 62.9% and 52.3% for U(OX) and FU(OX). To evaluate the application of the prepared delivery platform, they were tested on colorectal cancer cells (CT-26) via MTT assay, cell migration assay, and spheroid model. IC50 values obtained from MTT assay were 21.38, 95.50, and 18.20 μg/mL for OX, U(OX), and FU(OX), respectively. After three days of treatment, the CT26 spheroids at two doses of 500 and 50 μg/mL of U(OX) and FU(OX) showed volume reduction. Moreover, the oxidative behavior of the prepared systems within the cell was assessed by total thiol, malondialdehyde, and superoxide dismutase activity. The results showed that FU(OX) had higher efficacy in preventing the growth of CT-26 spheroid, and was more effective than oxaliplation in cell migration inhibition, and induced higher oxidative stress and apoptosis.
Copyright © 2021. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Metal-organic framework; microporous nanomaterials; smart drug delivery system host-guest interactions

Year:  2021        PMID: 33991535     DOI: 10.1016/j.taap.2021.115573

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Toxicol Appl Pharmacol        ISSN: 0041-008X            Impact factor:   4.219


  4 in total

1.  In vitro and in vivo Evaluation of a Novel Estrogen-Targeted PEGylated Oxaliplatin Liposome for Gastric Cancer.

Authors:  Yuxin Sun; Yizhuo Xie; Huan Tang; Zhihui Ren; Xue Luan; Yan Zhang; Ming Zhu; Zhe Lv; Han Bao; Yan Li; Rui Liu; Yujia Shen; Yucui Zheng; Jin Pei
Journal:  Int J Nanomedicine       Date:  2021-12-23

2.  Use of folic acid nanosensors with excellent photostability for hybrid imaging.

Authors:  Denis Kuznetsov; Sergey Dezhurov; Dmitri Krylsky; Valery Novikov; Valery Neschisliaev; Anastasiia Kuznetsova
Journal:  J Zhejiang Univ Sci B       Date:  2022 Sept 15       Impact factor: 5.552

Review 3.  Synergic Antitumor Effect of Photodynamic Therapy and Chemotherapy Mediated by Nano Drug Delivery Systems.

Authors:  Mozhgan Aghajanzadeh; Mostafa Zamani; Fereshteh Rajabi Kouchi; Josh Eixenberger; Dorsa Shirini; David Estrada; Farhad Shirini
Journal:  Pharmaceutics       Date:  2022-01-29       Impact factor: 6.321

4.  CircASXL1 knockdown represses the progression of colorectal cancer by downregulating GRIK3 expression by sponging miR-1205.

Authors:  Guojiu Fang; Yibin Wu; Xueli Zhang
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2021-06-14       Impact factor: 2.754

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.