| Literature DB >> 33991464 |
Bruna Visniauskas1, Juliana C Perry1, Guiomar N Gomes2, Amanda Nogueira-Pedro3, Edgar J Paredes-Gamero3, Sergio Tufik1, Jair R Chagas1,3.
Abstract
Intermittent hypoxia (IH) is a feature of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA), a condition highly associated with hypertension-related cardiovascular diseases. Repeated episodes of IH contribute to imbalance of angiogenic growth factors in the hypertrophic heart, which is key in the progression of cardiovascular complications. In particular, the interaction between vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and the kallikrein-kinin system (KKS) is essential for promoting angiogenesis. However, researchers have yet to investigate experimental models of IH that reproduce OSA, myocardial angiogenesis, and expression of KKS components. We examined temporal changes in cardiac angiogenesis in a mouse IH model. Adult male C57BI/6 J mice were implanted with Matrigel plugs and subjected to IH for 1-5 weeks with subsequent weekly histological evaluation of vascularization. Expression of VEGF and KKS components was also evaluated. After 3 weeks, in vivo myocardial angiogenesis and capillary density were decreased, accompanied by a late increase of VEGF and its type 2 receptor. Furthermore, IH increased left ventricular myocardium expression of the B2 bradykinin receptor, while reducing mRNA levels of B1 receptor. These results suggest that in IH, an unexpected response of the VEGF and KKS systems could explain the reduced capillary density and impaired angiogenesis in the hypoxic heart, with potential implications in hypertrophic heart malfunction.Entities:
Keywords: bradykinin receptors; carboxypeptidase M; hypertrophy; neovascularization; obstructive sleep apnea; preconditioning; sleep
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 33991464 PMCID: PMC8123545 DOI: 10.14814/phy2.14863
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Physiol Rep ISSN: 2051-817X
FIGURE 1(a) Representative view of the experimental IH protocol. The concentration of oxygen was alternated from 21%–5% in the IH groups. The dashed line represents the setting point used for adjusting O2 levels in the chamber. (b) Experimental design of the study design. All animals were habituated three days before to the chamber apparatus and IH protocol (gray square). The animals were subjected to IH or normoxia (control) daily (8 AM–4 PM) for 1, 2, 3, 4, or 5 weeks. Control and IH groups are time‐matched and were euthanized in the same day (B)
Customized TaqMan assays (primers/probes, Thermo Scientific Co, USA), Genbank accession numbers, and mean cycle threshold (Ct) value of the target genes utilized in this study
| Genes | Accession number | Customized assay |
Mean Ct cDNA 10 μg |
|---|---|---|---|
|
| NM_009598.2 | Mm00802048_m1 | 22.9 ± 0.9 |
|
| NM_007539.2 | Mm04207315_s1 | 31.6 ± 0.4 |
|
| NM_009747.2 | Mm00437788_s1 | 30.6 ± 0.4 |
|
| NM_027468.1 | Mm01250796_m1 | 26.1 ± 0.3 |
|
| NM_001025250.3 | Mm01281449_m1 | 22.5 ± 0.5 |
|
| NM_010612.2 | Mm01222421_m1 | 20.8 ± 0.4 |
|
| NM_010431.2 | Mn00468869_m1 | 22.4 ± 0.5 |
|
| NM_007393.3 | Mm02619580_g1 | 19.4 ± 1.2 |
|
| NM_008084.2 | Mm99999915_g1 | 14.6 ± 0.4 |
|
| NM_009735.3 | Mm00437762_m1 | 18.7 ± 0.7 |
Cycle threshold values are expressed as mean of two technical replicates ± SEM.
Body weight and hypertrophy index in mice exposed to IH
| Normoxia | IH−1 | IH−2 | IH−3 | IH−4 | IH−5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Body Weight (g) | 26.2 ± 0.6 | 24.7 ± 0.6 | 22.6 ± 0.7* | 22.4 ± 0.5* | 23. 0 ± 0.3* | 23.9 ± 0.4* |
| Left ventricle (mg) | 75 ± 4.0 | 85 ± 6.8 | 74.3 ± 3.1 | 100.1 ± 3.1* | 86 ± 5.3 | 97.7 ± 7.1* |
| LV/Tibia length (mg/mm) | 4.16 ± 0.2 | 4.37 ± 0.2# | 4.16 ± 0.16# | 5.8 ± 0.28* | 5.15 ± 0.25* | 5.42 ± 0.42* |
| Tibia length (mm) | 17.8 ± 0.1 | 18.2 ± 0.1 | 17.8 ± 0.2 | 17.8 ± 0.2 | 17.5 ± 0.1 | 18.0 ± 0.1 |
Body weight: *different from normoxia (p < 0.05). Left ventricle: *different from normoxia (IH‐3: p = 0.018; IH‐5: p = 0.04). Left ventricle/tibia length ratio *different from normoxia (IH‐3: p = 0.003; IH‐5: p = 0.04) #different from IH‐3 (IH‐1: p = 0.02; IH‐2: p = 0.005). N = 10‐15/group. Results are expressed as mean ± SEM.
FIGURE 2In vivo myocardial angiogenesis. Representative hematoxylin/eosin staining sections of the left ventricle from a normoxia and IH‐3 (a and b). Representative images were obtained using a 20x objective. Arrows indicate the occurrence of cardiac angiogenesis around the Matrigel plug. M indicates the Matrigel plug in the left ventricular myocardium. (c) Quantitative analysis of angiogenesis, *Different from normoxia (p < 0.001), #different from IH‐1 (p < 0.001), N = 6–8/group. Results are expressed as the percentage of vessel area in the total Matrigel area, mean ± SEM. Scale bar: 100 μM
FIGURE 3Immunohistochemistry for von Willebrand factor in the left ventricle of mice exposed to 2 weeks of IH. Representative microphotographs were obtained using 10x objective (n = 2–3/per group) a and b. Matrigel (M) was implanted in the left ventricle myocardium. Scale bar: 200 μM. (b) Negative control. (c) Representative immunohistochemistry images of Von Willebrand in left ventricle (20 x objective). Arrows indicate the positive Von Willebrand stained around the Matrigel plug. Scale bar: 50 μM
FIGURE 4Capillary density. CD31/PECAM staining in heart sections of mice under hypoxia intermittent. Representative microphotographs were obtained using a 40x objective (a, b, c). Arrows indicate the CD‐31/PECAM stained in the left ventricle. (d) *different from normoxia (p < 0.001). N = 4–6/group. Data mean ±SEM. Scale bar: 50 μm
FIGURE 5Angiogenic factors in left ventricular myocardium by duration of intermittent hypoxia. Plot of relative amounts of HIF‐1 (a) VEGF‐A (b) and VEGF‐R2 (c) mRNA determined by RT‐PCR (N = 8–12/group). (a) *Different from normoxia (p = 0.001). (b) *Different from normoxia (p < 0.001). (c) *Different from normoxia (p = 0.001); # different from 1 week of IH (p = 0.02). Data are mean ± SEM
Expression values using GAPDH and B2 M endogenous genes
| Normoxia | IH−1 | IH−2 | IH−3 | IH−4 | IH−5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||||
|
| 1.0 ± 0.05 | 2.4 ± 0.3 | 3.0 ± 0.4* | 2.6 ± 0.5* | 3.0 ± 0.6* | 2.3 ± 0.2* |
|
| 0.95 ± 0.1 | 1.6 ± 0.2 | 2.5 ± 0.5* | 2.0 ± 0.6 | 2.6 ± 0.4* | 1.7 ± 0.2 |
|
| ||||||
|
| 1.0 ± 0.1 | 2.1 ± 0.4 | 2.0 ± 0.3 | 1.6 ± 0.2 | 2.6 ± 0.3* | 2.6 ± 0.1* |
|
| 1.0 ± 0.1 | 1.7 ± 0.2 | 2.6 ± 0.3 | 2.5 ± 0.8 | 3.2 ± 0.5* | 2.1 ± 0.6 |
|
| ||||||
|
| 1.0 ± 0.2 | 0.9 ± 0.1 | 2.1 ± 0.3 | 3.2 ± 0.6 | 3.2 ± 0.7 | 2.9 ± 0.6* |
|
| 1.0 ± 0.1 | 0.78 ± 0.1 | 1.3 ± 0.2 | 1.7 ± 0.4 | 1.9 ± 0.1 | 2.4 ± 0.7* |
|
| ||||||
|
| 1.0 ± 0.2 | 1.6 ± 0.2 | 1.3 ± 0.1 | 2.1 ± 0.4* | 1.2 ± 0.08 | 1.1 ± 0.1 |
|
| 0.97 ± 0.1 | 1.7 ± 0.1 | 2.9 ± 0.3* | 2.5 ± 0.3* | 2.3 ± 0.3* | 1.4 ± 0.2 |
|
| ||||||
|
| 1.0 ± 0.1 | 1.3 ± 0.1 | 1.5 ± 0.1 | 2.2 ± 0.4* | 1.2 ± 0.1 | 0.75 ± 0.1§ |
|
| 0.9 ± 0.1 | 1.0 ± 0.1 | 1.4 ± 0.1*# | 1.6 ± 0.1* | 1.2 ± 0.05 | 0.63 ± 0.1§ |
|
| ||||||
|
| 1.0 ± 0.1 | 0.86 ± 0.1 | 1.2 ± 0.1 | 1.1 ± 0.1 | 0.95 ± 0.04 | 0.83 ± 0.07 |
|
| 1.1 ± 0.1 | 0.94 ± 0.2 | 1.7 ± 0.2*# | 1.4 ± 0.2 | 1.6 ± 0.2 | 1.3 ± 0.2 |
HIF‐1, GAPDH: F (5,35) = 2.5782, p = 0.04, *different from normoxia (p = 0.04). B2 M: F (5,30) = 36,215, p = 0.011, *different from normoxia (p = 0.014). VEGF, GAPDH: F (5,32) = 26,461, p = 0.04, *different from normoxia (p = 0.04). B2 M: F (5,33) = 26,461, p = 0.04, *different from normoxia (p = 0.04). VEGF‐R2, GAPDH: F (5, 29) = 40,055, p = 0.001, *different from normoxia (p = 0.03). B2 M: F (5, 33) =26,461, p = 0.05. *different from normoxia (p = 0.04) and IH‐1 (p‐0.04). B2R, GAPDH: F (5, 37) = 30,874, p = 0.02, *different from normoxia and IH‐5 (p = 0.035). B2 M: F (5, 32) = 39,749, p = 0.006 *different from normoxia (p = 0.013); ACE, GAPDH: F (5, 37) =59,314, p < 0.001. *different from normoxia (p = 0.011), IH‐1 (p = 0.03), IH‐4 (p = 0.015), and IH‐5 (p = 0.0001). B2 M: F (5, 28) = 12,436, p = 0.0001. *different from normoxia (p = 0.01) and § different from IH‐1 (p = 0.02); # different from IH‐2 (p = 0.001) and IH‐3 (p = 0.001). CPM, GAPDH: F (5, 37) = 22,289, p = 0.07. B2 M: F (5, 33) = 24,485, p = 0.05. *different from normoxia (p = 0.04); §different from IH‐1 (p = 0.03).
FIGURE 6Protein expression of VEGF isoforms in left ventricular myocardium by duration of intermittent hypoxia. (a) Representative images of cardiac VEGF188, VEGF164, and VEGF120 in the left ventricle quantified by Western blot with normalization against GAPDH (N = 4/group). (b) Densitometry analysis of VEGF120. *different from normoxia (p = 0.01) and IH‐1 (p = 0.03). (c) Densitometry analysis of VEGF164. *different from normoxia (p < 0.001) and IH‐1 (p = 0.01). (d) Densitometry analysis of VEGF188, no significant changes found. Results are expressed as mean ± SEM in arbitrary units
Quantification of endothelial progenitor cells and mature endothelial cells in intermittent hypoxia
| Normoxia | IH−1 | IH−2 | IH−3 | IH−4 | IH−5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||||
| %EPC | 0.017 ± 0.001 | 0.005 ± 0.001 | 0.0140 ± 0.003 | 0.0410 ± 0.007*# | 0.0156 ± 0.002 | 0.0216 ± 0.008 |
| % of Mature endothelial cells | 1.25 ± 0.19 | 0.73 ± 0.12 | 1.55 ± 0.12 | 2.74 ± 0.54*# | 1.21 ± 0.29 | 1.57 ± 0.58 |
|
| ||||||
| %EPC | 0.36 ± 0.10 | 0.91 ± 0.32 | 0.97 ± 0.60 | 0.70 ± 0.18 | 0.24 ± 0.08 | 0.77 ± 0.46 |
| % of Mature endothelial cells | 0.88 ± 0.30 | 1.97 ± 0.68 | 1.78 ± 0.86 | 0.98 ± 0.29 | 0.86 ± 0.28 | 1.11 ± 0.43 |
|
| ||||||
| %EPC | 0.004 ± 0.002 | 0.007 ± 0.002 | 0.007 ± 0.003 | 0.020 ± 0.004*# | 0.015 ± 0.002 | 0.003 ± 0.001 |
| % of Mature endothelial cells | 0.030 ± 0.010 | 0.008 ± 0.007 | 0.008 ± 0.002 | 0.022 ± 0.007 | 0.017 ± 0.007 | 0.016 ± 0.005 |
In the bone marrow, % EPCs and % mature endothelial cells were *different from normoxia (p = 0.01), and #from IH‐1 (p = 0.001). In the heart, % EPCs were *different from normoxia (p = 0.01), and #from IH‐1 (p = 0.001). N = 5–6/group. Results are expressed as mean ± SEM.
FIGURE 7B1R mRNA levels and B2R expression in the left ventricular myocardium by duration of intermittent hypoxia. Plot of B1R mRNA levels relative to β‐actin (a) GAPDH (b) and B2 M (c) as endogenous controls (N=8‐12/group). (b) *Different from normoxia (p < 0.001). (c) *Different from normoxia (p < 0.02). (d) Plot of B2R mRNA expression as determined by RT‐PCR (N = 8–12/group). *different from normoxia (p < 0.001). (e) Representative western blot of B2R protein expression in the left ventricle (N = 4/group). (f) Densitometry analysis of B2R, normalized against GAPDH. *different from normoxia (p = 0.03). Results are expressed as mean ± SEM
FIGURE 8ACE and CPM gene expression and protein activity in left ventricular myocardium by duration intermittent hypoxia. Plot of ACE (a) and CPM (b) mRNA expression as determined by real‐time PCR (N = 8–12/group). ACE (c) and CPM (d) activities (N = 8–14/group). (a) *Different from normoxia (p = 0.04). (b) *different from normoxia (p = 0.012). (c) *Different from normoxia (p < 0.001), # different from 2 weeks of IH (p = 0.002). (d) *Different from normoxia (p = 0.001), # different from 1 week of intermittent hypoxia: IH‐1 vs. IH‐3, p = 0.03; IH‐1 vs. IH‐4, p < 0.001. Data are mean ± SEM
FIGURE 9Hypothetical scheme demonstrating possible consequences in the hypoxic heart. Possible effects of delayed increase of VEGF isoforms and abnormal interaction of the VEGF–KKS in 5 weeks of IH. Decreased ACE activity would increase the local concentration of BK, which in turn stimulates VEGF and interactions with B2R and VEGFR‐2. Furthermore, reduction of B1R downregulates CPM expression and activity in endothelial cells. Therefore, as demonstrated in the present study, the abnormal regulation of B2R/B1R‐VEGF‐R2 may contribute to impaired angiogenesis. Illustration created with BioRender.com