Literature DB >> 33991294

A physiologically-based pharmacokinetic model to describe antisense oligonucleotide distribution after intrathecal administration.

Michael Monine1, Daniel Norris2, Yanfeng Wang2, Ivan Nestorov3.   

Abstract

Antisense oligonucleotides (ASOs) are promising therapeutic agents for a variety of neurodegenerative and neuromuscular disorders, e.g., Alzheimer's, Parkinson's and Huntington's diseases, spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), caused by genetic abnormalities or increased protein accumulation. The blood-brain barrier (BBB) represents a challenge to the delivery of systemically administered ASOs to the relevant sites of action within the central nervous system (CNS). Intrathecal (IT) delivery, in which drugs are administered directly into the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) space, enables to bypass the BBB. Several IT-administered ASO therapeutics have already demonstrated clinical effect, e.g., nusinersen (SMA) and tofersen (ALS). Due to novelty of IT dosing for ASOs, very limited pharmacokinetic (PK) data is available and only a few modeling reports have been generated. The objective of this work is to advance fundamental understanding of whole-body distribution of IT-administered ASOs. We propose a physiologically-based pharmacokinetic modeling approach to describe the distribution along the neuroaxis based on PK data from non-human primate (NHP) studies. We aim to understand the key processes that drive and limit ASO access to the CNS target tissues. To elucidate the trade-off between parameter identifiability and physiological plausibility of the model, several alternative model structures were chosen and fitted to the NHP data. The model analysis of the NHP data led to important qualitative conclusions that can inform projection to human. In particular, the model predicts that the maximum total exposure in the CNS tissues, including the spinal cord and brain, is achieved within two days after the IT injection, and the maximum amount absorbed by the CNS tissues is about 4% of the administered IT dose. This amount greatly exceeds the CNS exposures delivered by systemic administration of ASOs. Clearance from the CNS is controlled by the rate of transfer from the CNS tissues back to CSF, whereas ASO degradation in tissues is very slow and can be neglected. The model also describes local differences in ASO concentration emerging along the spinal CSF canal. These local concentrations need to be taken into account when scaling the NHP model to human: due to the lengthier human spinal column, inhomogeneity along the spinal CSF may cause even higher gradients and delays potentially limiting ASO access to target CNS tissues.
© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Antisense oligonucleotide (ASO); Central nervous system (CNS); Intrathecal (IT) administration; Physiologically-based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) model

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33991294     DOI: 10.1007/s10928-021-09761-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn        ISSN: 1567-567X            Impact factor:   2.745


  2 in total

Review 1.  Application of novel quantitative bioanalytical methods for pharmacokinetic and pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic assessments of antisense oligonucleotides.

Authors:  Rosie Z Yu; Richard S Geary; Arthur A Levin
Journal:  Curr Opin Drug Discov Devel       Date:  2004-03

2.  Shapes and sizes of different mammalian cerebella. A study in quantitative comparative neuroanatomy.

Authors:  F Sultan; V Braitenberg
Journal:  J Hirnforsch       Date:  1993
  2 in total
  5 in total

Review 1.  In Vitro to In Vivo Extrapolation Linked to Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic Models for Assessing the Brain Drug Disposition.

Authors:  Yukiko Murata; Sibylle Neuhoff; Amin Rostami-Hodjegan; Hiroyuki Takita; Zubida M Al-Majdoub; Kayode Ogungbenro
Journal:  AAPS J       Date:  2022-01-13       Impact factor: 4.009

Review 2.  Next-generation strategies for gene-targeted therapies of central nervous system disorders: A workshop summary.

Authors:  Jill A Morris; Chris H Boshoff; Nina F Schor; Ling M Wong; Guangping Gao; Beverly L Davidson
Journal:  Mol Ther       Date:  2021-09-20       Impact factor: 11.454

Review 3.  Applications, Challenges, and Outlook for PBPK Modeling and Simulation: A Regulatory, Industrial and Academic Perspective.

Authors:  Wen Lin; Yuan Chen; Jashvant D Unadkat; Xinyuan Zhang; Di Wu; Tycho Heimbach
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2022-05-13       Impact factor: 4.580

Review 4.  Taking Advantages of Blood-Brain or Spinal Cord Barrier Alterations or Restoring Them to Optimize Therapy in ALS?

Authors:  Hugo Alarcan; Yara Al Ojaimi; Debora Lanznaster; Jean-Michel Escoffre; Philippe Corcia; Patrick Vourc'h; Christian R Andres; Charlotte Veyrat-Durebex; Hélène Blasco
Journal:  J Pers Med       Date:  2022-06-29

5.  PBPK-PD modeling for the preclinical development and clinical translation of tau antibodies for Alzheimer's disease.

Authors:  Peter Bloomingdale; Daniela Bumbaca-Yadav; Jonathan Sugam; Steve Grauer; Brad Smith; Svetlana Antonenko; Michael Judo; Glareh Azadi; Ka Lai Yee
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2022-09-02       Impact factor: 5.988

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.