Literature DB >> 33991251

Characterization of smallholder pig production systems in the Western Cape, South Africa.

Annelin Henriehetta Molotsi1, Melissa Cupido2, Louw C H Hoffman2,3.   

Abstract

This study set out to characterize the farming and management practices of smallholder pig production systems in the Western Cape, South Africa. Data was gathered in three municipalities: Khayelitsha (27 farmers), Mamre (26 farmers) and Malmesbury (22 farmers) with the use of a structured questionnaire through both face-to-face and telephonic interviews. The study revealed that smallholder pig farmers in the Western Cape owned on average 37.4 ± 50.5 pigs. Majority of farmers (61%) made use of tattoo markings to identify their pigs, 6% made use of ear tags and 4% clipped the ears of their pigs. More than 25% of farmers did not use any method of identification to mark their pigs. More than half of the respondents (51%) do not have formal recordkeeping systems in place. Livestock theft was found to be a major problem amongst farmers. No differences were found amongst the three study areas and the type of housing system used (P > 0.05). The most popular materials pens were constructed of across the three areas were wood (40%), corrugated iron (16%) or a combination of the two (32%); other materials used were cement blocks (5%), polystyrene (1%) or plastic (1%). Pig farmers kept 43% Large White, 43 % crossbred and 14% Landrace across the three districts. Commercial feed was used by 61% of Mamre farmers whereas Khayelitsha farmers fed an equal amount of by-products (44%) and mixed (44%) feed to their pigs, whereas Malmesbury fed 44% mixed, 33% commercial and 24% by-products obtained from factories to their pigs. Piglet mortality due to the sow lying on her piglets was experienced by 47% of farmers interviewed, whilst 29% had experienced piglet mortalities due to the cold. Perturbingly, 76% of farmers did not send dead pigs for a post-mortem, stating that they could not rely on veterinarians or afford their services. Smallholder pig farmers in Malmesbury (68%) and Khayelitsha (70%) sold their pigs to the informal market, indicating that keeping pigs provided a source of revenue. Mamre marketed 88% of their pigs as weaners, Khayelitsha marketed 73% of their pigs as growers, whereas Malmesbury kept 32% of their pigs as breeding stock. Khayelitsha and Malmesbury marketed their growers at 63.3 ± 41.2 kg and 51.5 ± 30.2 kg, respectively, to the informal market. The study highlights the farming practices of smallholder pig farmers in three districts in the Western Cape. There a few differences in the practices of these farmers, but overall, there are similar limitations that hinder them from improved production, such as limited recordkeeping, theft, lack of infrastructure and finances for post-mortem examination. Smallholder pig farmers in the Western Cape are still mainly selling to the informal market. This informal market is not fully characterized yet in the Western Cape, and more studies are needed to further determine and investigate the benefits of only selling to the informal market.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Food security; Housing; Marketing; Nutrition

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33991251     DOI: 10.1007/s11250-021-02649-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Trop Anim Health Prod        ISSN: 0049-4747            Impact factor:   1.559


  6 in total

1.  Institutional and production characteristics among smallholder pig producers in Enugu State, Nigeria.

Authors:  Jane M Chah; Mebel U Dimelu; Stella U Ukwuani
Journal:  Trop Anim Health Prod       Date:  2014-06-07       Impact factor: 1.559

2.  Participatory assessment of animal health and husbandry practices in smallholder pig production systems in three high poverty districts in Uganda.

Authors:  Michel M Dione; Emily A Ouma; Kristina Roesel; Joseph Kungu; Peter Lule; Danilo Pezo
Journal:  Prev Vet Med       Date:  2014-10-25       Impact factor: 2.670

3.  Potential for using indigenous pigs in subsistence-oriented and market-oriented small-scale farming systems of Southern Africa.

Authors:  James Madzimure; Michael Chimonyo; Kerstin K Zander; Kennedy Dzama
Journal:  Trop Anim Health Prod       Date:  2012-05-26       Impact factor: 1.559

4.  Characterization of smallholder pig production system: productive and reproductive performances of local and crossbred pigs in Sikkim Himalayan region.

Authors:  B G Nath; P K Pathak; S V Ngachan; A K Tripathi; A K Mohanty
Journal:  Trop Anim Health Prod       Date:  2013-05-02       Impact factor: 1.559

5.  Characteristics of the smallholder free-range pig production system in western Kenya.

Authors:  John M Kagira; Paul W N Kanyari; Ndicho Maingi; Samuel M Githigia; J C Ng'ang'a; Julia W Karuga
Journal:  Trop Anim Health Prod       Date:  2009-11-15       Impact factor: 1.559

6.  Prevalence of porcine cysticercosis and associated risk factors in smallholder pig production systems in Mbeya region, southern highlands of Tanzania.

Authors:  Erick V G Komba; Eliakunda C Kimbi; Helena A Ngowi; Sharadhuli I Kimera; James E Mlangwa; Faustin P Lekule; Chummy S Sikasunge; Arve Lee Willingham; Maria Vang Johansen; Stig M Thamsborg
Journal:  Vet Parasitol       Date:  2013-09-28       Impact factor: 2.738

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.