| Literature DB >> 33991224 |
Ling Ling Chan1,2, Robert Chen3,4, Huihua Li4,5, Amanda J Y Lee3, Wei Ying Go3, Weiling Lee3, Christine Lock6, Sumeet Kumar4,7, Adeline S L Ng4,8, Nagaendran Kandiah4,8, Louis C S Tan4,8, Eng King Tan4,8, Nicole C H Keong4,6.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the utility of the splenial angle (SA), an axial angular index of lateral ventriculomegaly measured on diffusion tensor MRI color fractional anisotropy maps, in differentiating NPH from Alzheimer's disease (AD), Parkinson's disease (PD), and healthy controls (HC), and post-shunt changes in NPH, compared to Evans' index and callosal angle.Entities:
Keywords: Diagnosis, differential; Hydrocephalus, normal pressure; Magnetic resonance imaging; Neurodegenerative diseases; ROC curve
Mesh:
Year: 2021 PMID: 33991224 PMCID: PMC8589785 DOI: 10.1007/s00330-021-07871-4
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Eur Radiol ISSN: 0938-7994 Impact factor: 5.315
Fig. 1Consecutive axial diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) fractional anisotropy (FA) maps in a healthy control subject and a patient with idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus (NPH) demonstrating gross deformation of the red-encoded callosal commissural fibers, and depiction of the splenial angle (SA) as a simple angular index (inset) of the compression and stretching of the posterior callosal commissural fibers alongside the posterior-medial walls of the lateral ventricles. The SA is placed over the limbs of the forceps major and pivoted over the midline on the first axial slice containing the complete body of the corpus callosum. Note the severely narrowed SA in the NPH patient arising from the gross ventricular distension compared to that in the HC
Fig. 2Evans’ index (EI), callosal angle (CA), and splenial angle (SA)measured on brain MRI in healthy controls (HC), Parkinson’s disease (PD), Alzheimer’s disease (AD), and normal pressure hydrocephalus (NPH) patients. a Axial FLAIR images demonstrating EI as a ratio of the maximal width of the frontal horns of the lateral ventricles (short blue line) against the maximal internal diameter of the cranium (long blue line) on the same section. b Left sagittal images depicting the coronal plane (red line) orthogonal to the anterior-posterior commissural (AC-PC) plane (blue line), and right coronal images demonstrating the CA subtended against the roof of the lateral ventricles. c Axial diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) color FA images containing the complete red-encoded callosal body depicting the SA subtended over the limbs of the forceps major and pivoted over the midline. Note the severely narrowed SA in an NPH patient arising from deformation of the red-encoded posterior callosal commissural fibers secondary to gross ventricular distension
Demographics of case-control study subjects and mean quantitative brain MRI measures
| Characteristic | HC | PD | AD | NPH | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| No. of patients | 19 | 19 | 19 | 19 | |
| Mean age (years ± SD) | 72.3 ± 5.38 | 73.6 ± 5.74 | 73.8 ± 5.60 | 73.7 ± 6.36 | 0.825 |
| No. of men | 11 | 11 | 11 | 11 | 1.000 |
| No. of women | 8 | 8 | 8 | 8 | |
| Mean MRI measure | |||||
| EI | 0.25 ± 0.02 | 0.29 ± 0.05 | 0.3 ± 0.06 | 0.38 ± 0.08 | |
| CA (°) | 112 ± 8.05 | 105 ± 20.0 | 104 ± 20.3 | 58.3 ± 15.6 | |
| SA (°) | 75.7 ± 13.1 | 67.0 ± 18.8 | 70.5 ± 11.9 | 25 ± 9.74 | |
Note: HC healthy controls, PD Parkinson’s disease, AD Alzheimer’s disease, NPH idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus, EI Evans’ index, CA callosal angle, SA splenial angle
The ANOVA test was used for comparison of the MRI measurements between groups, with statistical significance defined at p < 0.05 (marked in bold)
Fig. 4Boxplots of Evans’ index, callosal angle and splenial angle measurements, and pairwise comparisons between healthy controls (HC), Parkinson’s disease (PD), Alzheimer’s disease (AD), and idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus (NPH) groups, adjusted by the Benjamini and Hochberg method by controlling the false discovery rate. SA best segregated NPH from non-NPH subjects compared to EI and CA
Fig. 3Potential confounders to accurate, reproducible callosal angle (CA) measurements. Multiple pitfalls exist to positioning a coronal plane truly orthogonal to the anterior commissure-posterior commissural (AC-PC) plane for CA measurements. Greater variability in the CA measurement occurs with a erroneous acute/obtuse angulation of the coronal plane (CA ranged from 55.8° (right) to 80.4° (left) compared to 64.9° (middle) on the “true” coronal plane) than with b lateral right-left malrotations (CA was inconsistently variable: 66.2° (right) to 70.7° (left) compared to 64.9° (middle) on the “true” coronal plane), compared to the ease of SA measurement on a ubiquitous axial plane of acquisition (without need for plane reformation). These potential pitfalls make CA measures clinically less reproducible, limiting its ease of utility as a reliable imaging biomarker
Fig. 5Receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curves for the ability of Evans’ index (EI), callosal angle (CA), and splenial angle (SA) to differentiate idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus (NPH) from the healthy control (HC), Parkinson’s disease (PD), and Alzheimer’s disease (AD) groups
Stepwise multivariable logistical regression analysis to predict NPH from non-NPH (HC, PD, AD) groups with brain MRI measures as independent factors
| Characteristic | Receiver operating characteristics |
|---|---|
| EI | 0.902 (0.833, 0.971) |
| CA | 0.971 (0.940, 1.000) |
| SA | 0.990 (0.971, 1.000) |
| SA + EI | 0.989 (0.971, 1.000) |
| SA + CA | 0.992 (0.976, 1.000) |
| EI + CA + SA | 0.990 (0.973, 1.000) |
Note: HC healthy controls, PD Parkinson’s disease, AD Alzheimer’s disease, NPH idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus, EI Evans’ index, CA callosal angle, SA splenial angle
Temporal changes in brain MRI measures from baseline scan to 1-year follow-up in NPH patients
| Change in brain measures between MRI scans | Mean ± SD | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| With shunt | No shunt | ||
| Evans’ index | −0.03 ± 0.02 | 0.00 ± 0.01 | |
| Callosal angle (°) | 13.2 ± 14.3 | −2.1 ± 2.0 | |
| Splenial angle (°) | 13.1 ± 6.7 | 0.2 ± 5.2 | |
Note: Of eleven NPH patients who had follow-up brain MRI at 1 year after baseline MRI, six patients underwent ventriculoperitoneal shunting and five did not. Student’s t test was used to compare the changes from baseline in Evans’ index (EI), callosal angle (CA), and splenial angle (SA) between the six NPH patients who underwent shunting and the five who did not, with statistical significance defined at p < 0.05 (marked in bold)