Chun Sing Lam1, Yi Man Cheng1, Hoi Shan Li1, Ho-Kee Koon2, Chi Kong Li3,4,5, Celeste L Y Ewig6, Yin Ting Cheung7. 1. School of Pharmacy, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong. 2. School of Chinese Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong. 3. Department of Paediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong. 4. Hong Kong Hub of Paediatric Excellence, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong. 5. Department of Paediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, The Hong Kong Children's Hospital, Hong Kong, Hong Kong. 6. School of Pharmacy, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong. celeste.ewig@cuhk.edu.hk. 7. School of Pharmacy, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong. yinting.cheung@cuhk.edu.hk.
Abstract
PURPOSE: This study explored the pattern of complementary or alternative medicine (CAM) use among Chinese survivors of childhood cancer and identified potential drug-CAM interactions and factors predicting CAM use. METHODS: This cross-sectional study recruited 393 survivors of childhood cancer (male, 57.8%; mean age, 17.7 [SD = 7.3] years; mean years post-treatment, 8.8 [SD = 5.0]) from a public hospital in Hong Kong. Participants reported CAM and over-the-counter medications that they used in the past year. Prescription drug data were extracted from pharmacy dispensing records. Potential interactions between concurrent CAM and chronic medications were identified from well-established CAM-drug/herb-drug interaction databases. A multivariate logistic regression was performed to analyze associations of socio-demographic and clinical factors with CAM use. RESULTS: Half (n = 205/393, 52.2%) of the participants reported the use of CAM. The most popular CAMs were traditional Chinese medicine (n = 127/205, 62.0%) and natural products (n = 114/205, 55.3%). Among the 69 survivors (33.7%) concurrently using CAM and chronic medications, one-third (n = 21/69, 30.4%) were at risk of drug-CAM interactions that are of moderate significance. Adult survivors were more likely to use CAM than pediatric survivors (odds ratio [OR], 2.35; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.31-4.41). Brain tumor survivors were more likely than other solid tumor survivors to use non-oral therapies (OR, 2.70; 95% CI, 1.01-7.72). CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of CAM use among Chinese survivors of childhood cancer was high. A minority of survivors had a risk of clinically significant CAM-drug interactions. Future studies should focus on survivors' behavior and motivations for CAM use. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS: As the concurrent use of CAM and chronic medications might result in interactions, healthcare providers should proactively identify such interactions and develop referral pathways to promote evidence-based integrative therapies for survivors.
PURPOSE: This study explored the pattern of complementary or alternative medicine (CAM) use among Chinese survivors of childhood cancer and identified potential drug-CAM interactions and factors predicting CAM use. METHODS: This cross-sectional study recruited 393 survivors of childhood cancer (male, 57.8%; mean age, 17.7 [SD = 7.3] years; mean years post-treatment, 8.8 [SD = 5.0]) from a public hospital in Hong Kong. Participants reported CAM and over-the-counter medications that they used in the past year. Prescription drug data were extracted from pharmacy dispensing records. Potential interactions between concurrent CAM and chronic medications were identified from well-established CAM-drug/herb-drug interaction databases. A multivariate logistic regression was performed to analyze associations of socio-demographic and clinical factors with CAM use. RESULTS: Half (n = 205/393, 52.2%) of the participants reported the use of CAM. The most popular CAMs were traditional Chinese medicine (n = 127/205, 62.0%) and natural products (n = 114/205, 55.3%). Among the 69 survivors (33.7%) concurrently using CAM and chronic medications, one-third (n = 21/69, 30.4%) were at risk of drug-CAM interactions that are of moderate significance. Adult survivors were more likely to use CAM than pediatric survivors (odds ratio [OR], 2.35; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.31-4.41). Brain tumor survivors were more likely than other solid tumor survivors to use non-oral therapies (OR, 2.70; 95% CI, 1.01-7.72). CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of CAM use among Chinese survivors of childhood cancer was high. A minority of survivors had a risk of clinically significant CAM-drug interactions. Future studies should focus on survivors' behavior and motivations for CAM use. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS: As the concurrent use of CAM and chronic medications might result in interactions, healthcare providers should proactively identify such interactions and develop referral pathways to promote evidence-based integrative therapies for survivors.
Authors: Chun Sing Lam; Kwok Yin Au; Hing Yu Hung; Ho Wing Chou; Alex Wing Kwan Leung; Chi Kong Li; Ho Kee Koon; Yin Ting Cheung Journal: Front Rehabil Sci Date: 2022-06-15