Literature DB >> 33990659

Phantom and clinical assessment of small pulmonary nodules using Q.Clear reconstruction on a silicon-photomultiplier-based time-of-flight PET/CT system.

Zhifang Wu1,2, Binwei Guo1, Bin Huang1, Xinzhong Hao1, Ping Wu1, Bin Zhao1, Zhixing Qin1, Jun Xie3, Sijin Li4,5.   

Abstract

To evaluate the quantification accuracy of different positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET/CT) reconstruction algorithms, we measured the recovery coefficient (RC) and contrast recovery (CR) in phantom studies. The results played a guiding role in the partial-volume-effect correction (PVC) for following clinical evaluations. The PET images were reconstructed with four different methods: ordered subsets expectation maximization (OSEM), OSEM with time-of-flight (TOF), OSEM with TOF and point spread function (PSF), and Bayesian penalized likelihood (BPL, known as Q.Clear in the PET/CT of GE Healthcare). In clinical studies, SUVmax and SUVmean (the maximum and mean of the standardized uptake values, SUVs) of 75 small pulmonary nodules (sub-centimeter group: < 10 mm and medium-size group: 10-25 mm) were measured from 26 patients. Results show that Q.Clear produced higher RC and CR values, which can improve quantification accuracy compared with other methods (P < 0.05), except for the RC of 37 mm sphere (P > 0.05). The SUVs of sub-centimeter fludeoxyglucose (FDG)-avid pulmonary nodules with Q.Clear illustrated highly significant differences from those reconstructed with other algorithms (P < 0.001). After performing the PVC, highly significant differences (P < 0.001) still existed in the SUVmean measured by Q.Clear comparing with those measured by the other algorithms. Our results suggest that the Q.Clear reconstruction algorithm improved the quantification accuracy towards the true uptake, which potentially promotes the diagnostic confidence and treatment response evaluations with PET/CT imaging, especially for the sub-centimeter pulmonary nodules. For small lesions, PVC is essential.

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 33990659     DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-89725-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Rep        ISSN: 2045-2322            Impact factor:   4.379


  27 in total

Review 1.  Partial-volume effect in PET tumor imaging.

Authors:  Marine Soret; Stephen L Bacharach; Irène Buvat
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2007-05-15       Impact factor: 10.057

Review 2.  18F-FDG PET and PET/CT in the evaluation of cancer treatment response.

Authors:  Simona Ben-Haim; Peter Ell
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 10.057

3.  Lymph node metastasis in patients with clinical early-stage cervical cancer: detection with integrated FDG PET/CT.

Authors:  Sandro Sironi; Alessandro Buda; Maria Picchio; Patrizia Perego; Rossella Moreni; Antonio Pellegrino; Mario Colombo; Costantino Mangioni; Cristina Messa; Ferruccio Fazio
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2005-11-22       Impact factor: 11.105

4.  Does a novel penalized likelihood reconstruction of 18F-FDG PET-CT improve signal-to-background in colorectal liver metastases?

Authors:  Nassim Parvizi; James M Franklin; Daniel R McGowan; Eugene J Teoh; Kevin M Bradley; Fergus V Gleeson
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2015-06-29       Impact factor: 3.528

5.  Image reconstruction for PET/CT scanners: past achievements and future challenges.

Authors:  Shan Tong; Adam M Alessio; Paul E Kinahan
Journal:  Imaging Med       Date:  2010-10-01

6.  Influence of reconstruction iterations on 18F-FDG PET/CT standardized uptake values.

Authors:  Chris J Jaskowiak; Jesus A Bianco; Scott B Perlman; Jason P Fine
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 10.057

7.  Evaluation of F-18 fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) PET scanning for pulmonary nodules less than 3 cm in diameter, with special reference to the CT images.

Authors:  Hiroaki Nomori; Kenichi Watanabe; Takashi Ohtsuka; Tsuguo Naruke; Keiichi Suemasu; Kimiichi Uno
Journal:  Lung Cancer       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 5.705

Review 8.  The role of 18F-FDG PET in assessing therapy response in cancer of the cervix and ovaries.

Authors:  Julie K Schwarz; Perry W Grigsby; Farrokh Dehdashti; Dominique Delbeke
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2009-04-20       Impact factor: 10.057

9.  Early lung-cancer detection with spiral CT and positron emission tomography in heavy smokers: 2-year results.

Authors:  Ugo Pastorino; Massimo Bellomi; Claudio Landoni; Elvio De Fiori; Patrizia Arnaldi; Maria Picchio; Giuseppe Pelosi; Peter Boyle; Ferruccio Fazio
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2003-08-23       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 10.  Quantification, improvement, and harmonization of small lesion detection with state-of-the-art PET.

Authors:  Charlotte S van der Vos; Daniëlle Koopman; Sjoerd Rijnsdorp; Albert J Arends; Ronald Boellaard; Jorn A van Dalen; Mark Lubberink; Antoon T M Willemsen; Eric P Visser
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2017-07-08       Impact factor: 9.236

View more
  2 in total

1.  Impact of Bayesian penalized likelihood reconstruction on quantitative and qualitative aspects for pulmonary nodule detection in digital 2-[18F]FDG-PET/CT.

Authors:  Niklas Lohaus; Florian Enderlin; Stephan Skawran; Alexander Maurer; Ahmad M A Abukwaik; Daniel Franzen; Martin W Huellner; Michael Messerli
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-05-18       Impact factor: 4.996

2.  Small lesion depiction and quantification accuracy of oncological 18F-FDG PET/CT with small voxel and Bayesian penalized likelihood reconstruction.

Authors:  Lei Xu; Ru-Shuai Li; Run-Ze Wu; Rui Yang; Qin-Qin You; Xiao-Chen Yao; Hui-Fang Xie; Yang Lv; Yun Dong; Feng Wang; Qing-Le Meng
Journal:  EJNMMI Phys       Date:  2022-03-26
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.