| Literature DB >> 33990050 |
Qili Dai1, Jing Ding2, Linlu Hou1, Linxuan Li1, Ziying Cai3, Baoshuang Liu1, Congbo Song4, Xiaohui Bi1, Jianhui Wu1, Yufen Zhang5, Yinchang Feng1, Philip K Hopke6.
Abstract
Potential health benefits from improved ambient air quality during the COVID-19 shutdown have been recently reported and discussed. Despite the shutdown measures being in place, northern China still suffered severe haze episodes (HE) that are not yet fully understood, particularly how the source emissions changed. Thus, the meteorological conditions and source emissions in processing five HEs occurred in Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei area were investigated by analyzing a comprehensive real-time measurement dataset including air quality data, particle physics, optical properties, chemistry, aerosol lidar remote sensing, and meteorology. Three HEs recorded before the shutdown began were related to accumulated primary pollutants and secondary aerosol formation under unfavorable dispersion conditions. The common "business as usual" emissions from local primary sources in this highly polluted area exceeded the wintertime atmospheric diffusive capacity to disperse them. Thus, an intensive haze formed under these adverse meteorological conditions such as in the first HE, with coal combustion to be the predominant source. Positive responses to the shutdown measures were demonstrated by reduced contributions from traffic and dust during the final two HEs that overlapped the Spring and Lantern Festivals, respectively. Local meteorological dispersion during the Spring Festival was the poorest among the five HEs. Increased residential burning plus fireworks emissions contributed to the elevated PM2.5 with the potential of enhancing the HEs. Our results highlight that reductions from shutdown measures alone do not prevent the occurrence of HEs. To further reduce air pollution and thus improve public health, abatement strategies with an emphasis on residential burning are needed.Entities:
Keywords: Air pollution; COVID-19; Haze; PM(2.5); Sources
Year: 2021 PMID: 33990050 DOI: 10.1016/j.envpol.2021.117252
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Environ Pollut ISSN: 0269-7491 Impact factor: 8.071