OBJECTIVE: The larger sample sizes available from multi-site publicly available neuroimaging data repositories makes machine-learning based diagnostic classification of mental disorders more feasible by alleviating the curse of dimensionality. However, since multi-site data are aggregated post-hoc, i.e. they were acquired from different scanners with different acquisition parameters, non-neural inter-site variability may mask inter-group differences that are at least in part neural in origin. Hence, the advantages gained by the larger sample size in the context of machine-learning based diagnostic classification may not be realized. METHODS: We address this issue using harmonization of multi-site neuroimaging data using the ComBat technique, which is based on an empirical Bayes formulation to remove inter-site differences in data distributions, to improve diagnostic classification accuracy. Specifically, we demonstrate this using ABIDE (Autism Brain Imaging Data Exchange) multi-site data for classifying individuals with Autism from healthy controls using resting state fMRI-based functional connectivity data. RESULTS: Our results show that higher classification accuracies across multiple classification models can be obtained (especially for models based on artificial neural networks) from multi-site data post harmonization with the ComBat technique as compared to without harmonization, outperforming earlier results from existing studies using ABIDE. Furthermore, our network ablation analysis facilitated important insights into autism spectrum disorder pathology and the connectivity in networks shown to be important for classification covaried with verbal communication impairments in Autism. CONCLUSION: Multi-site data harmonization using ComBat improves neuroimaging-based diagnostic classification of mental disorders. SIGNIFICANCE: ComBat has the potential to make AI-based clinical decision-support systems more feasible in psychiatry.
OBJECTIVE: The larger sample sizes available from multi-site publicly available neuroimaging data repositories makes machine-learning based diagnostic classification of mental disorders more feasible by alleviating the curse of dimensionality. However, since multi-site data are aggregated post-hoc, i.e. they were acquired from different scanners with different acquisition parameters, non-neural inter-site variability may mask inter-group differences that are at least in part neural in origin. Hence, the advantages gained by the larger sample size in the context of machine-learning based diagnostic classification may not be realized. METHODS: We address this issue using harmonization of multi-site neuroimaging data using the ComBat technique, which is based on an empirical Bayes formulation to remove inter-site differences in data distributions, to improve diagnostic classification accuracy. Specifically, we demonstrate this using ABIDE (Autism Brain Imaging Data Exchange) multi-site data for classifying individuals with Autism from healthy controls using resting state fMRI-based functional connectivity data. RESULTS: Our results show that higher classification accuracies across multiple classification models can be obtained (especially for models based on artificial neural networks) from multi-site data post harmonization with the ComBat technique as compared to without harmonization, outperforming earlier results from existing studies using ABIDE. Furthermore, our network ablation analysis facilitated important insights into autism spectrum disorder pathology and the connectivity in networks shown to be important for classification covaried with verbal communication impairments in Autism. CONCLUSION: Multi-site data harmonization using ComBat improves neuroimaging-based diagnostic classification of mental disorders. SIGNIFICANCE: ComBat has the potential to make AI-based clinical decision-support systems more feasible in psychiatry.
Authors: Madhura Ingalhalikar; William A Parker; Luke Bloy; Timothy P L Roberts; Ragini Verma Journal: J Neurosci Methods Date: 2014-06-28 Impact factor: 2.390
Authors: Jean-Philippe Fortin; Drew Parker; Birkan Tunç; Takanori Watanabe; Mark A Elliott; Kosha Ruparel; David R Roalf; Theodore D Satterthwaite; Ruben C Gur; Raquel E Gur; Robert T Schultz; Ragini Verma; Russell T Shinohara Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2017-08-18 Impact factor: 6.556
Authors: Gordon D Waiter; Justin H G Williams; Alison D Murray; Anne Gilchrist; David I Perrett; Andrew Whiten Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2004-06 Impact factor: 6.556
Authors: Alexandre Abraham; Michael P Milham; Adriana Di Martino; R Cameron Craddock; Dimitris Samaras; Bertrand Thirion; Gael Varoquaux Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2016-11-16 Impact factor: 7.400
Authors: A Di Martino; C-G Yan; Q Li; E Denio; F X Castellanos; K Alaerts; J S Anderson; M Assaf; S Y Bookheimer; M Dapretto; B Deen; S Delmonte; I Dinstein; B Ertl-Wagner; D A Fair; L Gallagher; D P Kennedy; C L Keown; C Keysers; J E Lainhart; C Lord; B Luna; V Menon; N J Minshew; C S Monk; S Mueller; R-A Müller; M B Nebel; J T Nigg; K O'Hearn; K A Pelphrey; S J Peltier; J D Rudie; S Sunaert; M Thioux; J M Tyszka; L Q Uddin; J S Verhoeven; N Wenderoth; J L Wiggins; S H Mostofsky; M P Milham Journal: Mol Psychiatry Date: 2013-06-18 Impact factor: 15.992
Authors: Rogier A Feis; Stephen M Smith; Nicola Filippini; Gwenaëlle Douaud; Elise G P Dopper; Verena Heise; Aaron J Trachtenberg; John C van Swieten; Mark A van Buchem; Serge A R B Rombouts; Clare E Mackay Journal: Front Neurosci Date: 2015-10-27 Impact factor: 4.677
Authors: Yang Nan; Javier Del Ser; Simon Walsh; Carola Schönlieb; Michael Roberts; Ian Selby; Kit Howard; John Owen; Jon Neville; Julien Guiot; Benoit Ernst; Ana Pastor; Angel Alberich-Bayarri; Marion I Menzel; Sean Walsh; Wim Vos; Nina Flerin; Jean-Paul Charbonnier; Eva van Rikxoort; Avishek Chatterjee; Henry Woodruff; Philippe Lambin; Leonor Cerdá-Alberich; Luis Martí-Bonmatí; Francisco Herrera; Guang Yang Journal: Inf Fusion Date: 2022-06 Impact factor: 17.564