| Literature DB >> 33989111 |
Xingling Qi1, Yipeng Fu2, Jia Sheng3, Meng Zhang1, Mingxing Zhang1, Yumeng Wang1, Guiling Li1.
Abstract
Ferroptosis, a newly discovered iron-dependent form of cell death, contributes to various pathologies; however, the prognostic value of ferroptosis-related genes (FRGs) in cervical cancer (CC) remains unclear. Herein, we identified 15 differentially expressed FRGs based on data from The Cancer Genome Atlas database. Ten FRGs that correlated with prognosis were screened by univariate Cox regression analysis. The least absolute shrinkage and selection operator regression model was performed to develop a novel prognostic signature. A four-gene model was built to separate samples into high-risk and low-risk groups. Overall survival was lower in the high-risk group than in the low-risk group (p < 0.05). Receiver operating characteristic curve showed a good diagnostic efficiency of the signature. The risk score was identified as an independent prognostic factor via multivariate Cox regression. A functional analysis further revealed a difference in the immune status between the two risk groups. To conclude, we constructed a novel prognostic signature based on FRGs. Targeting ferroptosis may represent a promising approach for the treatment of CC.Entities:
Keywords: Cervical cancer; biomarker; differentially expressed genes; prognosis; the cancer genome Atlas
Mesh:
Year: 2021 PMID: 33989111 PMCID: PMC8806749 DOI: 10.1080/21655979.2021.1925003
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Bioengineered ISSN: 2165-5979 Impact factor: 3.269
Figure 1.Flow-chart of patient enrollment and data collection
Baseline characteristics of patients with cervical cancer
| Parameter | Subtype | Number of cases (%) |
|---|---|---|
| ≤50 | 179 (61.7) | |
| >50 | 111 (38.3) | |
| I+ II | 147 (50.7) | |
| III+IV | 116 (40.0) | |
| Unknown | 27 (9.3) | |
| I+ II | 223 (76.9) | |
| III+IV | 61 (21.0) | |
| Unknown | 6 (2.1) | |
| Alive | 220 (75.8) | |
| Dead | 70 (24.2) |
Figure 2.Identification of candidate genes related to ferroptosis in cervical cancer. (a) Venn diagram illustrating prognostic DEGs between cervical cancer and adjacent non-cancer samples. (b) Heatmap analysis of 10 prognostic DEGs. (c) Forest plot with hazard ratios from the survival analysis based on the univariate Cox regression model using gene expression levels as variables. (d) Construction and visualization of a protein–protein interaction (PPI) network of DEGs generated using the STRING database. Yellow lines represent text-mining evidence in the PPI network, and black lines represent co-expressed proteins. (e) Network analysis of internal correlations among four candidate genes. Correlation coefficients are indicated by different colors
Figure 3.Synthetic analysis of the prognostic value of the ferroptosis-based risk signature. (a) Distribution of risk scores among CC samples. (b) Score plot for the principal component analysis (PCA). (c) Two-dimensional projection of CC-seq data from TCGA by a t-SNE analysis. (d) Distribution of four-gene risk scores and patient survival status. (e) OS by Kaplan–Meier curves for patients in the two risk groups. (f) Time-dependent ROC curves for survival prediction with AUC values
Baseline clinical characteristics of patients in the two risk groups
| Characteristics | High risk | Low risk | p-value |
|---|---|---|---|
| ≤50 y | 150 (48.8) | 305 (99.3) | |
| >50 y | 157 (51.2) | 2 (0.7) | |
| I+ II | 259 (84.3) | 223 (72.6) | |
| III+IV | 48 (15.7) | 84 (27.4) | |
| I+ II | 166 (54.1) | 302 (98.3) | |
| III+IV | 141 (45.9) | 5 (1.7) |
Figure 4.Prognostic value of the risk scores in the univariate (a) and multivariate (b) COX regression models
Figure 5.Results of GO (a) and KEGG pathways enrichment analyses (b) of DEGs among CC samples
Figure 6.Comparison of ssGSEA enrichment scores between high- and low-risk groups in CC samples from TCGA. Boxplots display the distribution of ssGSEA enrichment scores of 16 immune cells (a) and 13 immune-related biological processes (b). CCR, cytokine-cytokine receptor. Adjusted p-values are represented as follows: ns, not significant; *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001