Elisabeth Appel1, Christoph Thomas2, Andrea Steuwe1, Benedikt M Schaarschmidt3, Olga R Brook4, Joel Aissa5, Jörg Hennenlotter6, Gerald Antoch1, Johannes Boos7. 1. Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Medical Faculty, University Dusseldorf, Moorenstrasse 5, D-40225, Düsseldorf, Germany. 2. Radiologicum Krefeld, Oberdießemer Straße 96, 47805 Krefeld, Germany. 3. Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Neuroradiology, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, D-45147, Essen, Germany. 4. Department of Radiology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, 330 Brookline Ave, Boston, MA, USA. 5. RIO - Radiologie Institut Oberhausen, Mülheimer Str. 87, 46045 Oberhausen, Germany. 6. Department of Urology, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany. 7. Radiologie Münster MVZ, Von-Steuben-Str. 10a, 48143 Münster, Germany.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To assess accuracy of dual-energy computed tomography (DECT) to differentiate uric acid from calcium urinary stones in dual-energy split filter vs sequential-spiral vs dual-source acquisition. METHODS: Thirty-four urinary stones (volume 89.0 ± 77.4 mm³; 17 calcium stones, 17 uric acid stones) were scanned in a water-filled phantom using a split-filter equipped CT scanner (SOMATOM Definition Edge, Siemens Healthineers, Forchheim, Germany) in split-filter mode at 120 kVp and sequential-spiral mode at 80 and 140 kVp. Additional DE scans were acquired at 80 and 140 kVp (tin filter) with a dual-source CT scanner (SOMATOM Definition FLASH, Siemens Healthineers). Scans were performed with a CTDIvol of 7.3 mGy in all protocols. Urinary stone categorization was based on dual energy ratio (DER) using an automated 3D segmentation. As reference standard, infrared spectroscopy was used to determine urinary stone composition. RESULTS: All three DECT techniques significantly differentiated between uric acid and calcium stones by attenuation values and DERs (p < 0.001 for all). Split-filter DECT provided higher DERs for uric acid stones, when compared with dual-source and sequential-spiral DECT, and lower DERs for calcified stones when compared with dual-source DECT (p < 0.001 for both), leading to a decreased accuracy for material differentiation. CONCLUSION: Split-filter DECT, sequential-spiral DECT and dual-source DECT all allow for the acquisition of DER to classify urinary stones. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: Split-filter DECT enables the differentiation between uric acid and calcium stones despite decreased spectral separation when compared with dual-source and dual-spiral DECT.
OBJECTIVE: To assess accuracy of dual-energy computed tomography (DECT) to differentiate uric acid from calcium urinary stones in dual-energy split filter vs sequential-spiral vs dual-source acquisition. METHODS: Thirty-four urinary stones (volume 89.0 ± 77.4 mm³; 17 calcium stones, 17 uric acid stones) were scanned in a water-filled phantom using a split-filter equipped CT scanner (SOMATOM Definition Edge, Siemens Healthineers, Forchheim, Germany) in split-filter mode at 120 kVp and sequential-spiral mode at 80 and 140 kVp. Additional DE scans were acquired at 80 and 140 kVp (tin filter) with a dual-source CT scanner (SOMATOM Definition FLASH, Siemens Healthineers). Scans were performed with a CTDIvol of 7.3 mGy in all protocols. Urinary stone categorization was based on dual energy ratio (DER) using an automated 3D segmentation. As reference standard, infrared spectroscopy was used to determine urinary stone composition. RESULTS: All three DECT techniques significantly differentiated between uric acid and calcium stones by attenuation values and DERs (p < 0.001 for all). Split-filter DECT provided higher DERs for uric acid stones, when compared with dual-source and sequential-spiral DECT, and lower DERs for calcified stones when compared with dual-source DECT (p < 0.001 for both), leading to a decreased accuracy for material differentiation. CONCLUSION: Split-filter DECT, sequential-spiral DECT and dual-source DECT all allow for the acquisition of DER to classify urinary stones. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: Split-filter DECT enables the differentiation between uric acid and calcium stones despite decreased spectral separation when compared with dual-source and dual-spiral DECT.
Authors: Thorsten R C Johnson; Bernhard Krauss; Martin Sedlmair; Michael Grasruck; Herbert Bruder; Dominik Morhard; Christian Fink; Sabine Weckbach; Miriam Lenhard; Bernhard Schmidt; Thomas Flohr; Maximilian F Reiser; Christoph R Becker Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2006-12-07 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Isabel P Almeida; Lotte E J R Schyns; Michel C Öllers; Wouter van Elmpt; Katia Parodi; Guillaume Landry; Frank Verhaegen Journal: Med Phys Date: 2017-01-10 Impact factor: 4.071
Authors: F Lombardo; M Bonatti; G A Zamboni; G Avesani; N Oberhofer; M Bonelli; A Pycha; R Pozzi Mucelli; G Bonatti Journal: Clin Radiol Date: 2017-02-28 Impact factor: 2.350
Authors: Matthias Stefan May; Marco Wiesmueller; Rafael Heiss; Michael Brand; Joscha Bruegel; Michael Uder; Wolfgang Wuest Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2018-10-18 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Daniel T Boll; Neil A Patil; Erik K Paulson; Elmar M Merkle; W Neal Simmons; Sean A Pierre; Glenn M Preminger Journal: Radiology Date: 2009-03 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Andrea Steuwe; Birte Valentin; Oliver T Bethge; Alexandra Ljimani; Günter Niegisch; Gerald Antoch; Joel Aissa Journal: Diagnostics (Basel) Date: 2022-07-05