Wei-Teng Weng1, Chi-Jane Wang2, Chung-Yi Li3, Huai-Wei Wen1, Yen-Chin Liu1. 1. Department of Anesthesiology, National Cheng Kung University Hospital, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University, Taiwan. 2. Department of Nursing, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University, Taiwan. 3. Department of Public Health, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University, Taiwan.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Erector spinae plane block could be a potential alternative to paravertebral block or other analgesic techniques for breast surgery, but the current evidence on erector spinae plane block in breast surgery is conflicting. OBJECTIVE: To compare the analgesic effectiveness between erector spinae plane block, systemic analgesic, and paravertebral block for breast surgery. STUDY DESIGN: Meta-analysis. SETTING: The literature search was performed from 2016 to August 2020 using the MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane library, and ClinicalTrials.gov databases. METHODS: Clinical trials comparing erector spinae plane block to systemic analgesic and paravertebral block were included from the aforementioned databases. Primary outcomes were 24-hour postoperative opioid administration and postoperative pain score. Secondary outcomes were patient satisfaction levels, post-anesthesia care unit and hospital stay, block-related side effects, and opioid-related side effects. Systematic search, critical appraisal, and pooled analysis were performed according to the PRISMA statement. RESULTS: We analyzed 495 cases in 8 randomized controlled trials. Compared with a systemic analgesic, the use of erector spinae plane block resulted in a reduced 24-hour postoperative intravenous morphine equivalent dose by a mean difference of 7.59 mg (P < 0.00001). Compared with paravertebral block, no statistical difference was found in opioid administration. No differences were observed in pain score, opioid-related side effects, or analgesic technique-related complications. Between the trials, heterogeneity existed and could not be evaluated using meta-regression owing to inadequate reported data. LIMITATIONS: Moderate heterogeneity among the included trials could not be assessed by potential covariates owing to the limited reported data in each trial. CONCLUSION: Erector spinae plane block is superior to systemic analgesic within 24 hours after breast surgery and can serve as an alternative to paravertebral block with similar analgesic effects.
BACKGROUND: Erector spinae plane block could be a potential alternative to paravertebral block or other analgesic techniques for breast surgery, but the current evidence on erector spinae plane block in breast surgery is conflicting. OBJECTIVE: To compare the analgesic effectiveness between erector spinae plane block, systemic analgesic, and paravertebral block for breast surgery. STUDY DESIGN: Meta-analysis. SETTING: The literature search was performed from 2016 to August 2020 using the MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane library, and ClinicalTrials.gov databases. METHODS: Clinical trials comparing erector spinae plane block to systemic analgesic and paravertebral block were included from the aforementioned databases. Primary outcomes were 24-hour postoperative opioid administration and postoperative pain score. Secondary outcomes were patient satisfaction levels, post-anesthesia care unit and hospital stay, block-related side effects, and opioid-related side effects. Systematic search, critical appraisal, and pooled analysis were performed according to the PRISMA statement. RESULTS: We analyzed 495 cases in 8 randomized controlled trials. Compared with a systemic analgesic, the use of erector spinae plane block resulted in a reduced 24-hour postoperative intravenous morphine equivalent dose by a mean difference of 7.59 mg (P < 0.00001). Compared with paravertebral block, no statistical difference was found in opioid administration. No differences were observed in pain score, opioid-related side effects, or analgesic technique-related complications. Between the trials, heterogeneity existed and could not be evaluated using meta-regression owing to inadequate reported data. LIMITATIONS: Moderate heterogeneity among the included trials could not be assessed by potential covariates owing to the limited reported data in each trial. CONCLUSION: Erector spinae plane block is superior to systemic analgesic within 24 hours after breast surgery and can serve as an alternative to paravertebral block with similar analgesic effects.