Literature DB >> 33988081

Presenting artificial intelligence, deep learning, and machine learning studies to clinicians and healthcare stakeholders: an introductory reference with a guideline and a Clinical AI Research (CAIR) checklist proposal.

Jakub Olczak1, John Pavlopoulos2, Jasper Prijs3,4, Frank F A Ijpma4,5, Job N Doornberg3,4,5, Claes Lundström6, Joel Hedlund6, Max Gordon1.   

Abstract

Background and purpose - Artificial intelligence (AI), deep learning (DL), and machine learning (ML) have become common research fields in orthopedics and medicine in general. Engineers perform much of the work. While they gear the results towards healthcare professionals, the difference in competencies and goals creates challenges for collaboration and knowledge exchange. We aim to provide clinicians with a context and understanding of AI research by facilitating communication between creators, researchers, clinicians, and readers of medical AI and ML research.Methods and results - We present the common tasks, considerations, and pitfalls (both methodological and ethical) that clinicians will encounter in AI research. We discuss the following topics: labeling, missing data, training, testing, and overfitting. Common performance and outcome measures for various AI and ML tasks are presented, including accuracy, precision, recall, F1 score, Dice score, the area under the curve, and ROC curves. We also discuss ethical considerations in terms of privacy, fairness, autonomy, safety, responsibility, and liability regarding data collecting or sharing.Interpretation - We have developed guidelines for reporting medical AI research to clinicians in the run-up to a broader consensus process. The proposed guidelines consist of a Clinical Artificial Intelligence Research (CAIR) checklist and specific performance metrics guidelines to present and evaluate research using AI components. Researchers, engineers, clinicians, and other stakeholders can use these proposal guidelines and the CAIR checklist to read, present, and evaluate AI research geared towards a healthcare setting.

Year:  2021        PMID: 33988081     DOI: 10.1080/17453674.2021.1918389

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Orthop        ISSN: 1745-3674            Impact factor:   3.717


  5 in total

Review 1.  [Artificial intelligence and novel approaches for treatment of non-union in bone : From established standard methods in medicine up to novel fields of research].

Authors:  Marie K Reumann; Benedikt J Braun; Maximilian M Menger; Fabian Springer; Johann Jazewitsch; Tobias Schwarz; Andreas Nüssler; Tina Histing; Mika F R Rollmann
Journal:  Unfallchirurgie (Heidelb)       Date:  2022-07-09

2.  Machine learning classifiers do not improve prediction of hospitalization > 2 days after fast-track hip and knee arthroplasty compared with a classical statistical risk model.

Authors:  Katrin B Johannesdottir; Henrik Kehlet; Pelle B Petersen; Eske K Aasvang; Helge B D Sørensen; Christoffer C Jørgensen
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2022-01-03       Impact factor: 3.717

Review 3.  Guidelines for Artificial Intelligence in Medicine: Literature Review and Content Analysis of Frameworks.

Authors:  Norah L Crossnohere; Mohamed Elsaid; Jonathan Paskett; Seuli Bose-Brill; John F P Bridges
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2022-08-25       Impact factor: 7.076

4.  A Systematic Review of Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning Applications to Inflammatory Bowel Disease, with Practical Guidelines for Interpretation.

Authors:  Imogen S Stafford; Mark M Gosink; Enrico Mossotto; Sarah Ennis; Manfred Hauben
Journal:  Inflamm Bowel Dis       Date:  2022-10-03       Impact factor: 7.290

Review 5.  Predictive models for clinical decision making: Deep dives in practical machine learning.

Authors:  Sandra Eloranta; Magnus Boman
Journal:  J Intern Med       Date:  2022-04-25       Impact factor: 13.068

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.