| Literature DB >> 33987605 |
JunHyung Lee1, Abdolreza Hosseindoust2, MinJu Kim3, KwangYeol Kim4, TaeGyun Kim2, Joseph Moturi2,5, ByungJo Chae2.
Abstract
This study was aimed to investigate the Cu bioavailability, growth response, digestibility of nutrients, and blood metabolites of broiler chicks fed CuSO4 in nano or common forms. A total of 720 broiler chickens were distributed between eight treatments according to a completely randomized design. There were 8 treatments and 6 replicates in each treatment with 15 birds/replicate. The treatments were divided into common copper sulfate at the doses of 16 ppm, 40 ppm, 80 ppm, and 120 ppm (INO) and hot-melt extruded copper sulfate at the doses of 16 ppm, 40 ppm, 80 ppm, and 120 ppm (HME-Cu). The experiment was operated for 35 days in 2 phases (phase 1, d 0 to 14; and phase 2, d 15 to 35). No significant differences were shown in growth performance, feed intake, FCR, and nutrient digestibility among the treatments. The concentration of Cu in the serum was increased in the HME-Cu broilers compared with the INO broilers at phase 2. A linear increase was observed in the concentration of Cu in the liver in broilers fed INO diets, however, no significant differences were observed by the supplementation of HME-Cu levels. The linear increase was detected in the content of Cu in excreta in the INO and HME-Cu treatments by increasing the dietary Cu content. The HME-Cu treatments showed a lower Cu concentration in the excreta compared with the INO treatments. The higher bioavailability of Cu in HME form can decrease the recommended dose of Cu in broiler diets. © Copyright 2021 Korean Society of Animal Science and Technology.Entities:
Keywords: Bioavailability; Chickens; Excreta; Liver; Nano copper; Serum
Year: 2021 PMID: 33987605 PMCID: PMC8071743 DOI: 10.5187/jast.2021.e24
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Anim Sci Technol ISSN: 2055-0391
Ingredients and chemical composition of basal diet (as-fed basis)
| Item | Phase 1 | Phase 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Ingredient (%) | 100.00 | 100.00 |
| Corn | 52.88 | 58.93 |
| Soybean meal | 38.8 | 31.56 |
| Corn gluten meal | 2.5 | 3.6 |
| Animal fat | 2.2 | 2.4 |
| Limestone | 0.61 | 0.57 |
| Mono-di calcium phosphate | 1.67 | 1.56 |
| Salt | 0.2 | 0.2 |
| Vitamin premix[ | 0.15 | 0.15 |
| Mineral premix[ | 0.15 | 0.15 |
| L-Lysine (55%) | 0.24 | 0.20 |
| L-Threonine (78%) | 0.24 | 0.38 |
| DL-Methionine (84%) | 0.28 | 0.22 |
| Choline chloride (42%) | 0.08 | 0.08 |
| Calculated chemical composition | ||
| Metabolizable energy (kcal/kg) | 3,000 | 3,100 |
| Crude protein (%) | 23.00 | 21.50 |
| Calcium (%) | 0.96 | 0.87 |
| Available phosphorus (%) | 0.48 | 0.44 |
| SID lysine (%) | 1.28 | 1.15 |
| SID methionine (%) | 0.58 | 0.52 |
Supplied per kg diet: 12,000 U vitamin A, 5,000 U vitamin D3, 80 mg vitamin E, 3.2 mg vitamin B1, 8.6 mg vitamin B2, 5.4 mg vitamin B6, 0.017 mg vitamin B12, 3.2 mg vitamin K3, 18 mg pantothenic acid, 60 mg niacin, 0.30 mg biotin, 2.2 mg folic acid, 18 mg ethoxyquin.
Supplied per kg diet: 20 mg Fe, 110 mg Zn, 120 mg Mn, 1.25 mg I, 0.3 mg Se. The copper content was depend on the treatments.
SID, standardized ileal digestiblity.
Effects of dietary Cu concentrations and sources on growth performance in broiler chickens
| Weight gain (g/bird) | Feed intake (g/bird) | FCR | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 to 14 d | 15 to 35 d | 0 to 35 d | 0 to 14 d | 15 to 35 d | 0 to 35 d | 0 to 14 d | 15 to 35 d | 0 to 35 d | ||
| Cu source × Concentration | ||||||||||
| INO (ppm) | 16 | 317 | 1,366 | 1,683 | 480 | 2,213 | 2,693 | 1.52 | 1.62 | 1.60 |
| 40 | 324 | 1,372 | 1,696 | 492 | 2,214 | 2,706 | 1.52 | 1.61 | 1.60 | |
| 80 | 322 | 1,377 | 1,699 | 492 | 2,172 | 2,665 | 1.53 | 1.58 | 1.57 | |
| 120 | 323 | 1,397 | 1,719 | 492 | 2,225 | 2,717 | 1.53 | 1.59 | 1.58 | |
| HME (ppm) | 16 | 320 | 1,366 | 1,686 | 486 | 2,185 | 2,671 | 1.52 | 1.60 | 1.58 |
| 40 | 323 | 1,409 | 1,731 | 493 | 2,225 | 2,718 | 1.53 | 1.58 | 1.57 | |
| 80 | 333 | 1,379 | 1,711 | 501 | 2,172 | 2,673 | 1.51 | 1.58 | 1.56 | |
| 120 | 329 | 1,377 | 1,706 | 500 | 2,202 | 2,703 | 1.52 | 1.60 | 1.58 | |
| Pooled SEM | 1.72 | 5.69 | 5.63 | 2.29 | 14.41 | 14.78 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.01 | |
| Contrast | ||||||||||
| HME vs INO | 0.171 | 0.216 | 0.717 | 0.688 | 0.762 | 0.547 | 0.418 | 0.908 | 0.519 | |
| Effect of INO level | ||||||||||
| SEM | 2.29 | 9.04 | 8.72 | 2.93 | 23.54 | 24.05 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.01 | |
| Linear | 0.517 | 0.253 | 0.173 | 0.209 | 0.978 | 0.902 | 0.524 | 0.385 | 0.460 | |
| Quadratic | 0.512 | 0.715 | 0.833 | 0.296 | 0.608 | 0.704 | 0.775 | 0.757 | 0.798 | |
| Effect of HME level | ||||||||||
| SEM | 2.54 | 7.08 | 7.17 | 3.49 | 17.10 | 17.74 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.01 | |
| Linear | 0.088 | 0.988 | 0.516 | 0.107 | 0.987 | 0.771 | 0.835 | 0.974 | 0.873 | |
| Quadratic | 0.529 | 0.116 | 0.077 | 0.570 | 0.890 | 0.813 | 0.966 | 0.343 | 0.376 | |
FCR, feed conversion ratio; INO, copper sulfate; HME, hot melt extrusion copper sulfate.
Effects of dietary Cu concentrations and sources on Cu concentration in liver, serum, and excreta in broiler chickens
| Serum (ng/dL) | Liver (mg/kg) | Excreta (mg/kg) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 14 d | 35 d | ||||
| Cu source × Concentration | |||||
| INO (ppm) | 16 | 7.6 | 9.5 | 1.77 | 34.20 |
| 40 | 9.8 | 9.9 | 1.78 | 64.50 | |
| 80 | 10.8 | 9.4 | 1.87 | 140.30 | |
| 120 | 9.5 | 10.3 | 2.14 | 162.97 | |
| HME (ppm) | 16 | 12.0 | 12.4 | 1.93 | 26.93 |
| 40 | 11.6 | 12.3 | 2.01 | 52.22 | |
| 80 | 11.5 | 10.4 | 1.84 | 123.57 | |
| 120 | 9.2 | 13.3 | 1.73 | 141.63 | |
| Pooled SEM | 0.50 | 0.42 | 0.04 | 11.46 | |
| Contrast | |||||
| INO vs HME | 0.137 | 0.007 | 0.201 | 0.038 | |
| Effect of INO level | |||||
| Linear | 0.743 | 0.586 | 0.008 | < 0.001 | |
| Quadratic | 0.981 | 0.789 | 0.169 | 0.399 | |
| Effect of HME level | |||||
| Linear | 0.230 | 0.911 | 0.184 | < 0.001 | |
| Quadratic | 0.539 | 0.225 | 0.435 | 0.067 | |
INO, copper sulfate; HME, hot melt extrusion copper sulfate.
Effects of dietary Cu concentrations and sources on nutrients digestibility in broiler chickens
| Dry matter | Gross energy | Crude protein | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7 to 14 d | 28 to 35 d | 7 to 14 d | 28 to 35 d | 7 to 14 d | 28 to 35 d | ||
| Cu source × Concentration | |||||||
| INO (ppm) | 16 | 69.49 | 68.59 | 70.04 | 69.42 | 61.22 | 60.93 |
| 40 | 71.82 | 69.32 | 72.00 | 70.03 | 62.18 | 61.42 | |
| 80 | 72.07 | 73.51 | 73.19 | 71.39 | 62.46 | 61.87 | |
| 120 | 71.27 | 70.63 | 71.60 | 71.26 | 61.51 | 61.25 | |
| HME (ppm) | 16 | 71.30 | 70.58 | 71.55 | 69.30 | 61.38 | 61.03 |
| 40 | 71.02 | 70.14 | 71.18 | 70.01 | 60.92 | 60.73 | |
| 80 | 71.92 | 71.19 | 70.82 | 69.49 | 61.10 | 60.92 | |
| 120 | 71.81 | 70.77 | 72.35 | 71.52 | 62.25 | 61.76 | |
| Pooled SEM | 0.29 | 0.70 | 0.28 | 0.36 | 0.28 | 0.33 | |
| Contrast | |||||||
| INO vs HME | 0.559 | 0.662 | 0.507 | 0.921 | 0.583 | 0.743 | |
| Effect of INO level | |||||||
| SEM | 0.45 | 1.36 | 0.46 | 0.63 | 0.30 | 0.48 | |
| Linear | 0.149 | 0.449 | 0.109 | 0.290 | 0.686 | 0.777 | |
| Quadratic | 0.080 | 0.552 | 0.040 | 0.791 | 0.155 | 0.627 | |
| Effect of HME level | |||||||
| SEM | 0.36 | 0.48 | 0.34 | 0.38 | 0.48 | 0.47 | |
| Linear | 0.527 | 0.748 | 0.527 | 0.066 | 0.575 | 0.631 | |
| Quadratic | 0.921 | 0.994 | 0.201 | 0.334 | 0.469 | 0.610 | |
INO, copper sulfate; HME, hot melt extrusion copper sulfate.
Effects of dietary Cu concentrations and sources on haematological parameters in broiler chickens
| Item | WBC (103/µL) | RBC (106/µL) | Hb (g/dL) | HCT (%) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 14 d | 35 d | 14 d | 35 d | 14 d | 35 d | 14 d | 35 d | ||
| Cu source × Concentration | |||||||||
| INO (ppm) | 16 | 28.09 | 22.01 | 1.93 | 2.21 | 9.80 | 6.73 | 22.00 | 28.00 |
| 40 | 26.55 | 24.41 | 1.87 | 2.28 | 8.90 | 7.06 | 21.53 | 29.04 | |
| 80 | 22.25 | 25.15 | 1.89 | 2.32 | 9.23 | 7.28 | 21.07 | 29.30 | |
| 120 | 26.80 | 25.07 | 1.81 | 2.22 | 8.40 | 7.25 | 20.67 | 28.20 | |
| HME (ppm) | 16 | 23.66 | 22.91 | 1.84 | 2.44 | 9.47 | 7.48 | 21.33 | 30.70 |
| 40 | 26.75 | 23.50 | 1.98 | 2.20 | 8.70 | 7.13 | 22.37 | 29.03 | |
| 80 | 28.00 | 24.32 | 1.95 | 2.18 | 8.97 | 7.44 | 22.03 | 27.86 | |
| 120 | 20.75 | 25.76 | 1.88 | 2.29 | 9.43 | 7.36 | 21.83 | 28.92 | |
| Pooled SEM | 0.74 | 0.64 | 0.02 | 0.04 | 0.19 | 0.12 | 0.20 | 0.50 | |
| Contrast | |||||||||
| INO vs HME | 0.387 | 0.665 | 0.272 | 0.626 | 0.885 | 0.069 | 0.144 | 0.460 | |
| Effect of INO | |||||||||
| SEM | 0.89 | 1.06 | 0.07 | 0.04 | 0.34 | 0.15 | 1.01 | 0.54 | |
| Linear | 0.192 | 0.379 | 0.309 | 0.879 | 0.183 | 0.261 | 0.159 | 0.880 | |
| Quadratic | 0.670 | 0.601 | 0.881 | 0.346 | 0.957 | 0.591 | 0.960 | 0.385 | |
| Effect of HME level | |||||||||
| SEM | 0.90 | 0.80 | 0.07 | 0.07 | 0.33 | 0.19 | 0.95 | 0.81 | |
| Linear | 0.411 | 0.217 | 0.710 | 0.450 | 0.947 | 0.121 | 0.630 | 0.396 | |
| Quadratic | 0.998 | 0.801 | 0.947 | 0.226 | 0.286 | 0.145 | 0.270 | 0.435 | |
WBC, white blood cell; RBC, red blood cell; Hb, hemoglobin; HCT, hematocrit; INO, copper sulfate; HME, hot melt extrusion copper sulfate.