Da Young Lee1, Seung Yun Lee1, Hea Jin Kang1, Yeonhwa Park2, Sun Jin Hur1. 1. Department of Animal Science and Technology, Chung-Ang University, Anseong 17546, Korea. 2. Department of Food Science, University of Massachusetts Amherst, Amherst, MA 01003, USA.
Despite increasing meat consumption, the use of slaughter by-products is limited
owing to the increase in the volume of imported by-products, the lack of improvement
in consumer awareness, and a lack of product development [1,2]. The efficient use of
by-products from the meat production process is very important not only in reducing
waste, but also in improving the efficiency of utilization of livestock products.
Although the utilization rate is not high owing to a low efficiency of extraction,
there are many bioactive substances in meat by-products, such as heparin, collagen,
chenodeoxycholic acid (CDCA), and ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA), conjugated linoleic
acid (CLA) [3-5].Among the many bioactive substances in meat by-products, heparin is a compound
carbohydrate that is an anticoagulant (blood thinner) to prevent blood clotting
[6]. It is a polysaccharide of
glycosaminoglycans with a strong negative charge and is found on the cell surface
and in the extracellular matrix [6]. It was
also confirmed in the 1950s that the activity of anti-thrombin was accelerated by
heparin [7,8]. Heparin is widely distributed in various tissues such as the lung,
liver, blood, and intestinal tissues of higher animals, especially in the mast
cells. Heparin, which is used in laboratories and clinics, is generally extracted
from the bovine heart or the small intestinal mucosa of swine, and is made into a
calcium or sodium salt through enzymatic and chemical treatment [6].Heparin is especially used for preventing of blood clotting during ventrotomy and
organ transplantation, deep vein thrombosis, or heart thrombosis that develops as a
result of blood circulatory deterioration. In addition, it has many biological
functions, such as anti-inflammatory, antithrombotic, antihyperlipidemic, and
anti-arteriosclerotic properties, as well as anticoagulant function that inhibits
thrombin activity [9,10]. Previous studies have shown that heparin inhibits the
production of angiotensin by renin and inhibits aldosterone secretion, and
ultimately has an antihypertensive effect [11-13]. Infection and
thrombosis are the most common complications of central venous catheters. Various
gram-positive and negative bacteria cause catheter-related sepsis through central
venous catheter [14,15]. The antibacterial activity of heparin was confirmed in
various bacteria related to the above [14-18].However, it is very expensive and time consuming to extract and purify heparin from
pork by-products. Moreover, there are no studies comparing the amount of heparin in
each pig by-product. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to develop a low- cost
and highly efficient heparin extraction method in seven major pig by-products and
analyze the anti-angiotensin I-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitory activity in the
extracted heparin and the antimicrobial activity against pathogenic
microorganisms.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Pre-processing of pig by-products
Six pig by-products (liver, lungs, heart, stomach, small intestine, and large
intestine) for the extraction of heparin were obtained from the Dodram slaughter
house (Anseong, Korea) and Woo-gyeung Livestock (Hwaseong, Korea). The pig
by-products were transported to the laboratory and cleaned with tapwater and
then the bronchi connection to the lungs and esophageal connection to the
stomach were severed, and the non-discharged digest inside and outside the
organs was washed. After washing, the by-products were ground using a chopper,
then subdivided, and stored frozen (Fig.
1).
Fig. 1.
Preparation of pig by-products.
Heparin extraction in pig by-products
Methods for the extraction of heparin from pig by-products were described
previously by Charles and Scott [19-21], Freeman et al.
[22], Volpi [23], and Sarwar [24]
with modifications in order to simplify the extraction. Folch I solution
(chloroform-methanol mixture, 2:1 by volume) was added to the by-product samples
and homogenized using a homogenizer (SHG-15D-Set, SciLab-brand, Seoul, Korea)
for autolysis. After shaking every 30 min for 3 h, the crude fat was extracted
and the solution and by-product tissues were separated. The Folch I solution
used in the extraction of crude fat was separated by adding 0.88% NaCl solution
and left overnight. The chloroform layer (the lower layer) in which fat was
precipitated was dried to obtain crude fat. The by-product tissue was rinsed
once with 250 mL of acetone, completely dried at low temperature, and stored
frozen. Crude fat and protein obtained in the process of extracting heparin can
be used to extract other high-value-added materials present in pig by-products
(Fig. 2).
Fig. 2.
Procedures of defatting/dehydration treatment of pig
by-products.
The method for extracting heparin from dried by-products after degreasing
proceeded on the basis of the amount of dry by-product powder. To 100 g of dried
by-products, 1,460 mL of 0.5N NaOH and 174 mL of saturated ammonium sulfate
solution were added and the mixture was extracted in a water bath at 60°C
for 30 min. Using gauze, discard the solids and collect the solution. Then, 7N
sulfuric acid was added to the solution for titration to obtain a pH of 2, which
formed a precipitate. This solution was centrifuged (Combi 514R, Hanil
Scientific, gimpo, Korea) at 2,691 × g for raw min to remove the
precipitate. The supernatant was extracted with 200 mL of 95% ethyl alcohol at
25°C for 20 h. The solution was centrifuged at 2,697×g for 20 min
to remove the supernatant, and 150 mL of alkaline water (pH 10) was added to the
precipitate. For each experiment, 0.5% of alkaline-AK was added to the
by-product amount in the above mixture, and trypsin and papain were added at
0.25% of the by-product amount. After addition of 300 μL xylene, the
mixture was left at 60°C in a water bath (37°C for trypsin) for 12
h. One hundred milliliters of 95% ethyl alcohol was added to the solution that
had undergone proteolysis, and this was left for 20 h. The resulting precipitate
was collected by centrifuging at 2.691×g for 30 min, and dissolved in 50
mL of alkaline water (pH 10). After addition of 25 mL of acetone, the mixture
was stirred sufficiently, and the supernatant was removed by centrifugation at
2.691×g for 30 min. Then, 25 mL of 95% ethyl alcohol was added to the
precipitate and incorporated thoroughly by stirring, and the precipitate was
dried to obtain the heparin (Fig. 3).
Fig. 3.
Procedures of heparin extraction.
Quantification of heparin by high-performance liquid chromatography
(HPLC)
Heparinsodium salt from the porcine intestinal mucosa (192 USP unit/mg,
Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) was used as a heparin standard reagent for
HPLC analysis. Quantification of extracted heparin from pig by-products was
performed according to the method of Arumugam and Shanmugam [25], with slight modifications. Standard
solutions were prepared by dissolving the standard heparin in distilled water
(DW) at concentrations of 0.625–10 mg/mL. For the extracted heparin, HPLC
analysis was carried out at a concentration of 2 mg/mL (Table 1).
Table 1.
High performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) conditions for heparin
analysis
Parameter
Condition
HPLC model
HP Agilent 1100, Hewlett Packard, Palo
Alto, CA, USA
Column
Fortis H2O C18
(150 × 4.6 mm id, 5 μm)
Mobile phase
Distilled water (DW)
Injection volume
20 μL
Flow rate
1 mL/min
Column temperature
30°C
Detector
UV 210 nm
COATEST heparin assay
Heparinsodium salt from porcine intestinal mucosa (192 USP unit/mg,
Sigma-Aldrich) was used as a standard heparin reagent for heparin unit analysis
and was analyzed using COATEST Heparin (Chromogenix, West Chester, OH, USA). A
COATEST Heparin kit (Chromogenix) was used to measure the units of extracted
heparin according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Standard solutions
were prepared by dissolving the standard heparin in DW at concentrations of 0.2
IU/mL (1 μg/9.6 mL), and the extracted heparin was analyzed at a
concentration of 0.2 μg/mL (Fig.
4).
Fig. 4.
Assay of standard/sample heparin
Measurement of angiotensin I-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitory
activity
ACE inhibitory activity was measured according to the method of Cushman and
Cheung [26], with slight modifications.
ACE solution was prepared by adding rabbit lung acetone powder (Sigma-Aldrich)
at a concentration of 50 mg/mL to 0.01 M potassium phosphate buffer (pH 7.0)
containing 0.5 M sodium chloride, stirring for 18 h, and centrifuging at
10,280×g for 60 min to obtain the supernatant. Hippuryl-His-Leu (HHL)
solution was prepared by mixing 0.05 M sodium tetraborate and 0.05 M boric acid
to a pH of 8.3 and then adding hippuryl-1-histidyl-1-leucine to this 0.05 M
sodium borate buffer (pH 8.3). Then, 50 μL of HHL was added to standard
heparin or 50 μL of extracted heparin, and the mixture was reacted at
37°C for 10 min. ACE (50 μL) was added to this and reacted at
37°C for 30–60 min. After that, 250 μL of 1N HCl and 250
μL of ethyl acetate were added and vortexed for 1 min. After completion
of the reaction, the mixture was centrifuged at 1,977×g for 10 min. The
200 μL of hippuric acid in the supernatant was added to a new tube and
completely dried in a drying oven (WOF-50, Daihan scientific, Wonju, Korea). The
dried sample was dissolved in 1 mL of water just before measurement and placed
in a cuvette. The dried sample was measured using a UV/VIS spectrophotometer
(Cary 300 UV VIS, Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA) at a wavelength of
228 nm. To measure the antihypertensive activity of the sample, the control
reaction was carried out by adding DW instead of the sample. After adding the
substrate to the blank, the reacted value was measured by adding 0.05 M sodium
borate instead of ACE. The absorbance value was substituted into the following
equation to evaluate the antihypertensive activity:where C is the absorbance value of the control, B is the absorbance value of the
blank, and S is the absorbance value of standard heparin or extracted
heparin.
Measurement of antimicrobial activity
In order to measure the antimicrobial activity of heparin, four kinds of
bacteria, Listeria monocytogenes ATCC 7644, Pseudomonas
aeruginosa KCTC 1750T (= ATCC 10145),
Escherichia coli ATCC 25922, and Staphylococcus
aureus ATCC 33591 were used. The viable count of microorganisms was
determined by counting the number of colonies formed after incubation at
37°C for 24 h. Brain heart infusion broth and agar (BHIB/BHIA, BD
DifcoTM, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA) was used as culture media for
culturing the bacteria. The bacteria cultured in BHIB at 37°C for 12 h
was inoculated BHIA at 37°C for 24 h to measure the number of viable
microorganisms. Based on the number of viable microorganisms, the bacteria
cultured for 12 h were diluted to 1 × 107 CFU/mL. Then
0.625–10 mg/mL standard heparin was diluted 9:1 in the medium (medium:
heparin). The cultured bacteria were divided into 96 cell culture plates (SPL,
Pocheon, Korea) for 0, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, and 24 h and analyzed using a microplate
reader (ELISA [enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay device], Spectramax 190,
Molecular Devices, San Jose, CA, USA), and the relative antibacterial activity
was calculated. For the extracted heparin, concentrations of 5–20 mg/mL
were prepared and the turbidity of the culture was measured.
Statistical analysis
Statistical analysis of the experiment was conducted by one-way ANOVA using the
SPSS 22.0 program (IBM, Armonk, NY, USA). Statistical significance was assessed
using the multi-range test of Student-Newman-Keuls’ and significance
level of all data was evaluated based on p < 0.05.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
The amount of defatted pig by-product powder was significantly different among
the organs. The liver, lungs, and heart had an average of about 19.5% of
defatted-dried organ, and the stomach, small intestine, and large intestine,
which are relatively hydrated, had 10.7% of defatted-dried organs (Fig. 5). The amount of defatted pig
by-product powder was 420 g in liver, 162 g in lung, 83 g in heart, 105 g in
stomach, 161 g in small intestine, and 40 g in the large intestine (Fig. 5) from 500 g of the pig by-product.
This accounts for about 16% of the total 6 kg of pig by-product that are left
after slaughter. The defatted-dried by-products are advantageous in delaying the
decay of the by-products, thereby increasing the shelf life of the by-products,
and reducing the cost of storage by reducing the volume of the sample.
Fig. 5.
Defatted dry matter acquisition amount of pig by-products.
Data are given as mean values ± SD (n = 3).
Defatted dry matter acquisition amount of pig by-products.
Data are given as mean values ± SD (n = 3).The extraction rate of heparin from each by-product was based on the weight of
pig by-products before manufacturing the defatted pig by-product powder. Heparin
was extracted at the highest rate in the liver and heart and was relatively low
in the lung (Fig. 6, Table 2). These results indicate that the amount of heparin
extracted from pig livers was similar to or greater than the results from a
previous study [20]. The calculated
amount of heparin extracted from total pig by-products was about 1,718 mg
extracted by trypsin, about 1,697 mg extracted by papain, and about 1,905 mg
extracted by alkaline-AK enzyme (Fig. 6,
Table 2). In the conventional heparin
extraction methods, proteolytic enzymes such as trypsin are used to remove
proteins [19,20,22]. However,
this study attempted to extract heparin using alkaline-AK, an industrial enzyme
which is inexpensive, and a high titer enzyme, such as papain. Alkaline-AK is a
proteolytic enzyme obtained by fermenting soybean meal by-products, which is
about 1.3 million times cheaper than trypsin and 2,000 times cheaper than
papain. The extraction of heparin after the acquisition of crude fat using Folch
I reagent seems to reduce the final heparin extraction amount, but it generates
additional benefits from the high value substances obtained in the crude
fat.
Fig. 6.
Extracted heparin yield from pig by-products.
Data are given as mean values ± SD (n = 3).
a–cp < 0.05 depends on
organ.
Table 2.
Comparison of yield of heparin extracted from pig organs using three
different enzymes
Organ
Extracted heparin
(mg)
Trypsin
Papain
Alkaline-AK
Liver
453 ± 102[a]
391 ± 49[a]
473 ± 22[a]
Lung
118 ± 11[c]
112 ± 18[c]
132 ± 13[c]
Heart
344 ± 115[a]
359 ± 62[a]
491 ± 26[a]
Stomach
308 ± 86[b]
196 ± 19[b]
281 ± 79[b]
Small intestine
195 ± 64[b]
171 ± 64[b]
224 ± 58[b]
Large intestine
194 ± 44[b]
266 ± 28[b]
256 ± 34[b]
Extracted heparin yield per original pig by-products 1 kg. Data are
given as mean values ± SD (n = 3).
p < 0.05 depends on organ.
Extracted heparin yield from pig by-products.
Data are given as mean values ± SD (n = 3).
a–cp < 0.05 depends on
organ.Extracted heparin yield per original pig by-products 1 kg. Data are
given as mean values ± SD (n = 3).p < 0.05 depends on organ.Glycosaminoglycan-based materials such as heparin can be identified using various
chromatographic methods such as HPLC [25,27-29], UPLC [30], and liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry (LC/MS)
[31,32]. Heparin is a strongly negatively charged substance [25,27-29]. When using
reverse phase chromatography, heparin is first separated from the column by
binding to a polar mobile phase. In this study, the small intestines contained
the largest amount of heparin in 1 g of extracted heparin, and a relatively
small amount of heparin was identified in the heart and stomach. This indicates
that a high purity heparin is extracted in the small intestine and a low purity
heparin is extracted in the heart and stomach. The statistical analysis
confirmed that there was a significant difference in the amount of pure heparin
by enzyme in each by-product. As a result, high purity heparin can be obtained
using trypsin is higher than the others in the liver, lungs, heart, and small
intestine. In the large intestine, papain is higher than the others. In the
stomach, heparin of similar purity was obtained by the three enzymes. The
average amount of heparin extracted by enzymes was confirmed in the order of
trypsin is greater than or equal to papain, alkaline-AK (Figs. 7A and 7B).
Fig. 7.
HPLC analysis of extracted heparin (A) standard calibration curve of
standard heparin amount, (B) determination of pure heparin amount per
extracted gram of heparin using HPLC.
Data are given as mean values ± SD (n = 3).
a–cp < 0.05 depends on enzyme
in same organ.
HPLC analysis of extracted heparin (A) standard calibration curve of
standard heparin amount, (B) determination of pure heparin amount per
extracted gram of heparin using HPLC.
Data are given as mean values ± SD (n = 3).
a–cp < 0.05 depends on enzyme
in same organ.COATEST heparin assay quantifies the units of heparin. Heparin is analyzed in the
form of a complex with anti-thrombin present in the sample. The units/mg of
extracted heparin were similar in almost all pig by-products, but heparin
extracted from the stomach was found to contain the highest amount of heparin at
an average of 2,670 units/mg. The liver showed significant differences in units
extracted by enzymes, in the order of alkaline-AK and papain greater than
trypsin. In the case of the other by-products, there was a difference in the
amount of extracted enzymes but there was no significant difference because the
standard deviation was too large (Figs. 8A
and 8B). However, the average amount of
enzyme in the total by-products was in the order of papain and alkaline-AK
greater than trypsin. It is assumed that the difference in the amounts of
heparin in the same sample may be due to the proteolytic action of trypsin
(serine peptidase) and papain (cysteine peptidase) [33].
Fig. 8.
COATEST heparin assay of extracted heparin (A) standard calibration
of standard heparin unit, (B) determination of heparin unit amount per
milligram of extracted heparin using a COATEST heparin assay.
Data are given as mean values ± SD (n = 4).
a–cp < 0.05 depends on enzyme
in same organ.
COATEST heparin assay of extracted heparin (A) standard calibration
of standard heparin unit, (B) determination of heparin unit amount per
milligram of extracted heparin using a COATEST heparin assay.
Data are given as mean values ± SD (n = 4).
a–cp < 0.05 depends on enzyme
in same organ.
Measurement of angiotensin I-converting enzyme inhibitory activity
Studies on the antihypertensive activity of heparin have been conducted since the
20th century. Heparin inhibits the production of angiotensin by renin [12], and suppresses aldosterone secretion
[11,13], and therefore is antihypertensive. Based on the previous
studies, an experiment was conducted to confirm whether heparin extracted
through an ACE inhibitory activity assay has antihypertensive activity that
inhibits the production of angiotensin II (Fig.
9). Heparin extracted with papain had the highest antihypertensive
activity (72.5%) and extracted heparin showed higher antihypertensive activity
in alkaline-AK and trypsin (Fig. 10).
Based on the results of the COATEST heparin assay, it can be inferred that the
treatment containing the highest amount of heparin showed higher ACE inhibitory
activity.
Fig. 9.
Mechanism of the renin angiotensin system.
ACE, anti-angiotensin I-converting enzyme.
Fig. 10.
ACE inhibitory activity of extracted heparin using different enzymes
(2 mg/mL).
Data are given as mean values ± SD (n = 4).
a–cp < 0.05 depends on enzyme.
ACE, anti-angiotensin I-converting enzyme.
Mechanism of the renin angiotensin system.
ACE, anti-angiotensin I-converting enzyme.
ACE inhibitory activity of extracted heparin using different enzymes
(2 mg/mL).
Data are given as mean values ± SD (n = 4).
a–cp < 0.05 depends on enzyme.
ACE, anti-angiotensin I-converting enzyme.In the case of S. aureus, 2 mg/mL heparin was added to a medium
containing an initial bacterial count of 1.21 × 103 CFU/mL.
Heparin extracted by papain and alkaline-AK were shown to have an antimicrobial
activity at low concentration (Fig. 11).
However, in the case of L. monocytogens, E.
coli, and P. aeruginosa, all the treatments in the
samples cultured for 12 h did not grow compared to the control, but an
antibacterial effect of heparin was not found (Fig. 11). As a result, the antimicrobial activity of the extracted
heparin could not be confirmed and the regularity of the antimicrobial activity
treatment by concentration could not be confirmed. These results suggest that
there is no antibacterial activity of heparin against P.
aeruginosa, or that the antimicrobial activity was not exhibited by
using an excessive concentration of bacteria (Fig. 11).
Fig. 11.
Antimicrobial activity of extracted heparin using different enzymes
in Staphylococcus aureus, Listeria monocytogenes, Escherichia
coli, Pseudomonas aeruginosa (2 mg/mL).
Heparin can be extracted from pig by-products, and is used in the medical fields
for anticoagulant purposes. Heparin, which has been commercialized in the past,
was limited to extractions from the pig small intestine, and heparin in other
pig by-products was not utilized. Various studies have been conducted to reduce
the disposal cost of the discarded pig by-products and further industrialize
them [1]. The current study carried out
experiments on the extraction, quantification, and validation of heparin. In
this study, heparin was extracted from not only the small intestine (as is
usually done), but also from six other major pig by-products. Using various
types of proteolytic enzymes (papain and alkaline-AK), it was confirmed that
heparin extraction could be similar to or greater than that of conventional
enzyme extractions (trypsin), but using inexpensive and high titer enzymes. The
above findings confirm that heparin can be extracted by a faster and simpler
extraction method than the existing extraction method, and can verify the amount
of heparin contained in the pig by-product. Heparin was purified immediately
after extraction and subjected to quantitative analysis to confirm the amount.
As a result of measuring the purity of extracted heparin by HPLC, extracted
heparin from each enzyme showed similar purity. Among them, heparin extracted
from the liver and small intestine were shown to have the highest purity. The
COATEST heparin assay, which measures the units of heparin, indicated the
highest extractions of heparin from the liver and heart. Based on the total
amount of liver, it was confirmed that Pa-H (heparin extracted using papain) and
AK-H (heparin extracted using alkaline-AK) contained more units than Tr-H
(heparin extracted using trypsin).ACE inhibitory activity and antimicrobial activity were measured to verify the
efficacy of the extracted heparin. In the ACE inhibitory activity experiment,
the activities were confirmed in the order of Pa-H, Ak-H, and Tr-H. This was
similar to the units of extracted heparin analyzed by the COATEST heparin assay.
Based on these results, it could be assumed that high heparin content confers
ACE inhibitory activity. The antimicrobial activity of heparin (according to
heparin units) was confirmed in S. aureus. No distinct
antimicrobial activity was found against L. monocytogenes,
E. coli, and P. aeruginosa, which may
require further investigation.The use of crude fat and protein generated during heparin extraction
shortens the extraction time, and enzyme differentiation improved the
efficiency of heparin extraction from pig by-products.Data were presented to indicate the amount of heparin per pig by-product.
The average amount of extracted heparin per kilogram of pig by-product
was 439 mg from the liver, 127 mg from the lung, 398 mg from the heart,
261 mg from the stomach, 197 mg from the small intestine, and 239 mg
from the large intestine.Various enzymes were used to extract heparin, and the amount of extracted
heparin was similar. Based on the major pig by-products (from one pig),
trypsin, papain, and alkaline-AK enzymes extracted 1,718 mg, 1,697 mg,
and 1,905 mg heparin, respectively.Heparin showed antihypertensive activity and antimicrobial activity
against S. aureus, and confirmed the possibility as a
material to prevent or suppress disease.
The results of this study are summarized as follows:
For industrialization and mass production of heparin, it is important to
establish a low-cost extraction process that can secure national
competitiveness. Therefore, in this study, a method to reduce the production
cost of heparin and generate additional profits was developed by simplifying the
process and using inexpensive alkaline-AK (1.3 million times cheaper than
trypsin, and 2,000 times cheaper than papain). Alkaline-AK enzyme extraction can
obtain similar amounts of heparin compared to other enzymes and reduce the cost
of the extraction process. Extracting heparin after crude fat is removed can
reduce the use of enzymes and generate additional profits. Heparin’s ACE
inhibitory activity and antimicrobial activity, which have not been fully
studied, were confirmed, confirming the potential of heparin as a drug.
Therefore, further investigation should be directed here in the future.
Authors: Michael L Trehy; John C Reepmeyer; Richard E Kolinski; Benjamin J Westenberger; Lucinda F Buhse Journal: J Pharm Biomed Anal Date: 2008-12-24 Impact factor: 3.935
Authors: Sung Yeoul Yoon; Da Young Lee; On You Kim; Seung Yun Lee; Sun Jin Hur Journal: Korean J Food Sci Anim Resour Date: 2018-09-30 Impact factor: 2.622