Literature DB >> 33987516

Predicting recovery after lumbar spinal stenosis surgery: A protocol for a historical cohort study using data from the Canadian Spine Outcomes Research Network (CSORN).

Erynne Rowe1, Elizabeth Hassan2, Lisa Carlesso3,4, Janie Astephen Wilson1,2,5, Douglas P Gross6, Charles Fisher7, Hamilton Hall8, Neil Manson9, Ken Thomas10, Greg McIntosh11, Brian Drew5, Raja Rampersaud8, Luciana Macedo3.   

Abstract

Background: Symptomatic lumbar spinal stenosis (SLSS) is a condition in which narrowing of the spinal canal results in entrapment and compression of neurovascular structures. Decompressive surgery, with or without spinal fusion, is recommended for those with severe symptoms for whom conservative management has failed. However, significant persistent pain, functional limitations, and narcotic use can affect up to one third of patients postsurgery. Aims: The aim of this study will be to identify predictors of outcomes 1-year post SLSS surgery with a focus on modifiable predictors.
Methods: The Canadian Spine Outcomes Research Network (CSORN) is a large database of prospectively collected data on pre- and postsurgical outcomes among surgical patients. We include participants with a primary diagnosis of SLSS undergoing their first spine surgery. Outcomes are measured at 12 months after surgery and include back and leg pain, disability (Oswestry Disability Index, ODI), walking capacity (ODI item 4), health-related quality of life, and an overall recovery composite outcome (clinically important changes in pain, disability, and quality of life). Predictors include demographics (education level, work status, marital status, age, sex, body mass index), physical activity level, smoking status, previous conservative treatments, medication intake, depression, patient expectations, and other comorbidities. A multivariate partial least squares model is used to identify predictors of outcomes.
Conclusion: Study results will inform targeted SLSS interventions, either for the selection of best candidates for surgery or the identification of targets for presurgical rehabilitation programs.
© 2020 The Author(s). Published with license by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC.

Entities:  

Keywords:  back pain; longitudinal cohort study; lumbar spinal stenosis; partial least squares; surgery

Year:  2020        PMID: 33987516      PMCID: PMC7942767          DOI: 10.1080/24740527.2020.1734918

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can J Pain        ISSN: 2474-0527


  31 in total

1.  Measurement properties of walking outcome measures for neurogenic claudication: a systematic review and meta analysis.

Authors:  David B Anderson; Stephanie Mathieson; Jillian Eyles; Christopher G Maher; James M Van Gelder; Christy C Tomkins-Lane; Carlo Ammendolia; Vida Bella; Manuela L Ferreira
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2019-04-12       Impact factor: 4.166

2.  Cognitive-Behavioral-Based Physical Therapy for Patients With Chronic Pain Undergoing Lumbar Spine Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Kristin R Archer; Clinton J Devin; Susan W Vanston; Tatsuki Koyama; Sharon E Phillips; Shannon L Mathis; Steven Z George; Matthew J McGirt; Dan M Spengler; Oran S Aaronson; Joseph S Cheng; Stephen T Wegener
Journal:  J Pain       Date:  2015-10-23       Impact factor: 5.820

3.  Predictors of walking ability after surgery for lumbar spinal canal stenosis: a prospective study.

Authors:  Hiroto Takenaka; Hideshi Sugiura; Mitsuhiro Kamiya; Kasuri Nishihama; Atsuki Ito; Junya Suzuki; Morio Kawamura; Shuntaro Hanamura; Hirokatsu Hanamura
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2019-07-11       Impact factor: 4.166

4.  Prognostic Factors for Satisfaction After Decompression Surgery for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis.

Authors:  Rune Tendal Paulsen; Jamal Bech Bouknaitir; Søren Fruensgaard; Leah Carreon; Mikkel Andersen
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2018-05-01       Impact factor: 4.654

5.  Comparative outcomes and cost-utility after surgical treatment of focal lumbar spinal stenosis compared with osteoarthritis of the hip or knee--part 1: long-term change in health-related quality of life.

Authors:  Y Raja Rampersaud; Stephen J Lewis; J Roderick Davey; Rajiv Gandhi; Nizar N Mahomed
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2013-12-08       Impact factor: 4.166

6.  Longitudinal construct validity and responsiveness of measures of walking capacity in individuals with lumbar spinal stenosis.

Authors:  Christy C Tomkins-Lane; Michele C Battié; Luciana G Macedo
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2013-11-26       Impact factor: 4.166

7.  Use of prescription opioids before and after an operation for chronic pain (lumbar fusion surgery).

Authors:  Richard A Deyo; Sara E Hallvik; Christi Hildebran; Miguel Marino; Nicole O'Kane; Jody Carson; Joshua Van Otterloo; Dagan A Wright; Lisa M Millet; Wayne Wakeland
Journal:  Pain       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 7.926

Review 8.  EQ-5D and the EuroQol Group: Past, Present and Future.

Authors:  Nancy J Devlin; Richard Brooks
Journal:  Appl Health Econ Health Policy       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 2.561

9.  Prognostic function to estimate the probability of meaningful clinical improvement after surgery - Results of a prospective multicenter observational cohort study on patients with lumbar spinal stenosis.

Authors:  Ulrike Held; Jakob M Burgstaller; Maria M Wertli; Giuseppe Pichierri; Sebastian Winklhofer; Florian Brunner; François Porchet; Mazda Farshad; Johann Steurer
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-11-08       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  The incidence and healthcare costs of persistent postoperative pain following lumbar spine surgery in the UK: a cohort study using the Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD) and Hospital Episode Statistics (HES).

Authors:  Sharada Weir; Mihail Samnaliev; Tzu-Chun Kuo; Caitriona Ni Choitir; Travis S Tierney; David Cumming; Julie Bruce; Andrea Manca; Rod S Taylor; Sam Eldabe
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2017-09-11       Impact factor: 2.692

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.