Literature DB >> 33987488

Implementing high value back pain care in private physiotherapy in Australia: A qualitative evaluation of physiotherapists who participated in an "implementation to innovation" system.

Claire Gardner1,2, G Lorimer Moseley1, Emma L Karran1, Louise K Wiles1, Peter Hibbert1,3.   

Abstract

Objectives: Many barriers exist to delivering high-value care for people with low back pain (LBP). We have developed a multistrategy implementation system to overcome these barriers. Here we describe a qualitative evaluation of the experiences of private-sector physiotherapists implementing the system. Design: PRISM (Practice-based innovation and implementation system) is an iterative clinician-as-scientist implementation program, tailored here for acute and subacute LBP. PRISM integrates strategies from behavioral change, implementation, and educational science fields. Semistructured interviews, group discussion forums, and electronic questionnaires were used to collect data at multiple time points that were then analyzed using an interpretative descriptive approach. Participants: Six physiotherapists (purposive sample) practicing in private practice physiotherapy clinics in the Adelaide region, South Australia, were enrolled in the study. Interventions: Interventions included an educational pain science and care workshop incorporating self-regulated learning principles, a co-planned clinical pathway, an electronic decision support tool, development and support of a community of practice, case study simulations, audit and feedback, and collaborative problem solving and innovation for physiotherapists.
Results: Participants' experiences and perceptions centered around five themes: (1) knowledge and skills training; (2) networking and mentoring; (3) a clear clinical pathway; (4) practical tools; and (5) data feedback. Participants appraised the implementation process positively but identified patient receptiveness as a challenge at times. Suggestions for improvement included streamlining/automating data collection forms and processes and providing more simulation opportunities. Conclusions: PRISM appears to be a promising approach to overcoming several barriers that prevent people with back pain from receiving high-value care. It consolidates and increases pain science knowledge and increases physiotherapist confidence in delivering high-value care. It appears to legitimize some current practices, enhance clinical reasoning and communication skills, extend knowledge in line with contemporary pain science, and facilitate the application of a biopsychosocial management approach. The high-level acceptance by participants provides a foundation for further research to test outcomes and delivery in different settings. Contribution of the article A quality improvement intervention designed to improve delivery of high-value care was well received by private practice physiotherapists.Physiotherapists particularly valued using experiential learning to improve fluency in communicating with, and educating patients about, contemporary pain science.A structured clinical pathway and tools guided physiotherapists on the basic elements of necessary care and allowed them to concentrate on higher levels of decision making and communication with patients.
© 2020 The Author(s). Published with license by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC.

Entities:  

Keywords:  feasibility study; low back pain; physiotherapist perspectives; qualitative research; quality improvement

Year:  2020        PMID: 33987488      PMCID: PMC7951159          DOI: 10.1080/24740527.2020.1732808

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can J Pain        ISSN: 2474-0527


  33 in total

Review 1.  Audit and feedback: effects on professional practice and healthcare outcomes.

Authors:  Noah Ivers; Gro Jamtvedt; Signe Flottorp; Jane M Young; Jan Odgaard-Jensen; Simon D French; Mary Ann O'Brien; Marit Johansen; Jeremy Grimshaw; Andrew D Oxman
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2012-06-13

2.  People with low back pain want clear, consistent and personalised information on prognosis, treatment options and self-management strategies: a systematic review.

Authors:  Yuan Z Lim; Louisa Chou; Rebecca Tm Au; Kl Maheeka D Seneviwickrama; Flavia M Cicuttini; Andrew M Briggs; Kaye Sullivan; Donna M Urquhart; Anita E Wluka
Journal:  J Physiother       Date:  2019-06-18       Impact factor: 7.000

3.  Worsening trends in the management and treatment of back pain.

Authors:  John N Mafi; Ellen P McCarthy; Roger B Davis; Bruce E Landon
Journal:  JAMA Intern Med       Date:  2013-09-23       Impact factor: 21.873

Review 4.  What are the most effective strategies for improving quality and safety of health care?

Authors:  I Scott
Journal:  Intern Med J       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 2.048

5.  Strengths and challenges in the use of interpretive description: reflections arising from a study of the moral experience of health professionals in humanitarian work.

Authors:  Matthew R Hunt
Journal:  Qual Health Res       Date:  2009-09

6.  The perspectives of physiotherapists on managing nonspecific low back pain following a training programme in cognitive functional therapy: A qualitative study.

Authors:  Ian Cowell; Peter O'Sullivan; Kieran O'Sullivan; Ross Poyton; Alison McGregor; Ged Murtagh
Journal:  Musculoskeletal Care       Date:  2018-11-23

7.  The reassuring potential of spinal imaging results: development and testing of a brief, psycho-education intervention for patients attending secondary care.

Authors:  Emma L Karran; Yun-Hom Yau; Susan L Hillier; G Lorimer Moseley
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2017-11-17       Impact factor: 3.134

8.  Physiotherapists' beliefs and attitudes influence clinical practice in chronic low back pain: a systematic review of quantitative and qualitative studies.

Authors:  Tania Gardner; Kathryn Refshauge; Lorraine Smith; James McAuley; Markus Hübscher; Stephen Goodall
Journal:  J Physiother       Date:  2017-06-24       Impact factor: 7.000

9.  Low back pain.

Authors:  Anthony Delitto; Steven Z George; Linda Van Dillen; Julie M Whitman; Gwendolyn Sowa; Paul Shekelle; Thomas R Denninger; Joseph J Godges
Journal:  J Orthop Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2012-03-30       Impact factor: 4.751

10.  The epidemiology of low back pain in primary care.

Authors:  Peter M Kent; Jennifer L Keating
Journal:  Chiropr Osteopat       Date:  2005-07-26
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.