Literature DB >> 3398652

Wound prophylaxis with metronidazole in head and neck surgical oncology.

K T Robbins1, R M Byers, R Cole, V Fainstein, O M Guillamondegui, S P Schantz, R S Weber, P Wolf, H Goepfert.   

Abstract

Anaerobic organisms are thought to be an important source of wound infection in head and neck oncologic surgery. Antibiotic prophylaxis consisting of agents specific for anaerobes combined with broad-spectrum agents that provide coverage for other well-recognized pathogens should be an effective combination regimen for this group of patients. We conducted a prospective, randomized study comparing the efficacy of prophylaxis using combination of metronidazole and cefazolin-designated group A, to prophylaxis using cefazolin alone-group B, for patients undergoing oncologic procedures of the head and neck. The rate of wound infection in the cefazolin-metronidazole group (158 patients) was 9.5%, compared with 18.6% in the cefazolin group (172 patients) (p = 0.03). Patients undergoing clean procedures had a 4.9% infection rate overall, compared with 17.9% for clean-contaminated procedures, and 33.3% for contaminated procedures. The average length of hospitalization was 20.7 days for patients who developed infections, compared with 8.9 days for patients without infection. Anaerobic organisms were cultured in 12 of 26 patients, ten of whom did not receive metronidazole. The lower rate of wound infection among patients who received metronidazole suggests that anaerobic organisms are an important source of wound infection in head and neck oncologic surgery. Chemoprophylaxis for these patients should, therefore, include specific anaerobic coverage in addition to the broad-spectrum agents that cover the more familiar aerobic organisms.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3398652     DOI: 10.1288/00005537-198808000-00001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Laryngoscope        ISSN: 0023-852X            Impact factor:   3.325


  6 in total

1.  Advances in chemoprophylaxis for head and neck surgical wound infections.

Authors:  K T Robbins
Journal:  West J Med       Date:  1989-04

Review 2.  Metronidazole. A therapeutic review and update.

Authors:  C D Freeman; N E Klutman; K C Lamp
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 9.546

3.  Antimicrobial prophylaxis for major head and neck surgery in cancer patients: sulbactam-ampicillin versus clindamycin-amikacin.

Authors:  M Phan; P Van der Auwera; G Andry; M Aoun; G Chantrain; R Deraemaecker; P Dor; D Daneau; P Ewalenko; F Meunier
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1992-09       Impact factor: 5.191

4.  Antibiotic Prophylaxis Prescribing Practice in Head and Neck Tumor Resection and Free Flap Reconstruction.

Authors:  John Frederick Daly; Peter Francis Gearing; Nicholas Shi Jie Tang; Anand Ramakrishnan; Kasha Priya Singh
Journal:  Open Forum Infect Dis       Date:  2021-11-24       Impact factor: 3.835

5.  Perioperative Antibiotics in Clean-Contaminated Head and Neck Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Vincent Vander Poorten; Saartje Uyttebroek; K Thomas Robbins; Juan P Rodrigo; Remco de Bree; Annouschka Laenen; Nabil F Saba; Carlos Suarez; Antti Mäkitie; Alessandra Rinaldo; Alfio Ferlito
Journal:  Adv Ther       Date:  2020-03-05       Impact factor: 3.845

6.  Antimicrobial Prophylaxis in Neonates and Children Undergoing Dental, Maxillo-Facial or Ear-Nose-Throat (ENT) Surgery: A RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method Consensus Study.

Authors:  Erika Rigotti; Sonia Bianchini; Laura Nicoletti; Sara Monaco; Elena Carrara; Francesca Opri; Roberta Opri; Caterina Caminiti; Daniele Donà; Mario Giuffré; Alessandro Inserra; Laura Lancella; Alessandro Mugelli; Giorgio Piacentini; Nicola Principi; Simonetta Tesoro; Elisabetta Venturini; Annamaria Staiano; Alberto Villani; Enrico Sesenna; Claudio Vicini; Susanna Esposito
Journal:  Antibiotics (Basel)       Date:  2022-03-13
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.