Addendum: FosSahul 2.0, an updated database for the Late Quaternary fossil records of Sahul.

Addendum to: Scientific Data 10.1038/s41597-019-0267-3, published online 19 November 2019

The original publication described FosSahul 2.0, the updated version of the FosSahul database comprising collated and quality-rated megafauna fossil ages of the Late Quaternary from Sahul, as well as R code to run the algorithm that rated the quality of each age based on criteria established by Rodríguez-Rey et al.[1]. Since the paper was published, we received some useful feedback to improve the R code to ensure an objective and consistent rating of ages, which are outlined below.

Possible contamination of samples reported by authors

In the previously published version of the algorithm detailed in Peters et al.[2], we used details on potential sample contamination provided in the literature to inform the quality ranking. However, since these reports were too inconsistent across publications to provide objective quality control, we modified the algorithm not to use reported contamination for determining sample ranking. We now retain the information of reported contamination in the database as additional information for the end user to make final decisions on whether to accept or reject samples.

Fish otoliths as material used for radiocarbon dating

Fish otoliths are often used for radiocarbon dating; however, otoliths are not specifically mentioned in Table 2 of Rodríguez-Rey et al.[1]. Given that otoliths are aragonite carbonate samples, they should be grouped with shell and coral. We have now updated the algorithm to include otoliths in this group, which means the quality rating criteria outlined for this group also apply to otoliths.

Missing data

The authors of Gillespie et al.[3] provided advice for dealing with missing and/or incorrect details of their published ages included in the FosSahul 2.0 database, mainly regarding dating material and pre-treatment. These have now been corrected. Furthermore, we have added six new ages from Gillespie et al.[4] to the updated database.

Figure correction

Figure 3 in the original publication[2] contained an error in the calculation of temperature and precipitation anomalies. We have corrected this error here (see Figure 1). Both the original and updated datasets and code are now hosted on figshare[5] and GitHub (https://github.com/GlobalEcologyFlinders/FosSahul).

Fig. 1

Genus-level corrected, sampled-in-bin diversity index calculated from FosSahul 2.0 high-quality ages (i.e., scored A* and A) for megafauna specimens (from Sahul = green; from south-eastern Australia = orange), number of megafauna records (based on the full dataset = light grey; high-quality ages only = dark grey; high- quality ages for south-eastern Australia only = thin black bars), mean annual temperature (°C) and precipitation anomaly (mm day-1) relative to the present day, temperature velocity (m year-1), and precipitation velocity (m year-1) across time (in thousands of years before present). Both the ‘corrected, sampled-in-bin diversity index’ and the ‘number of records’ are calculated using 10,000-year time increments, with the oldest records dated to 180,000 years before present. Climate variable plots show the median value (solid line), and the 25th and 75th percentiles (light shading) calculated across Sahul. Yellow shading represents putative arrival window (including uncertainties) of humans in Sahul; see Bradshaw et al.[6] for discussion. This is a corrected version of Figure 3 from the original publication[2] which contained an error in the calculation of temperature and precipitation anomalies.