| Literature DB >> 33985569 |
Takuma Sakamoto1,2, Shunya Sasaki2, Nobuki Yamaguchi2, Miho Nakano2, Hiroki Sato2, Kikuo Iwabuchi2, Hiroko Tabunoki1,2, Richard J Simpson1,3, Hidemasa Bono4,5.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Insects are the most evolutionarily successful groups of organisms, and this success is largely due to their flight ability. Interestingly, some stick insects have lost their flight ability despite having wings. To elucidate the shift from wingless to flying forms during insect evolution, we compared the nutritional metabolism system among flight-winged, flightless-winged, and flightless-wingless stick insect groups.Entities:
Keywords: Enolase; Glycolytic pathway; RNA sequencing; Stick insect; Transcriptome assembly; Transcriptome database
Mesh:
Year: 2021 PMID: 33985569 PMCID: PMC8120901 DOI: 10.1186/s13104-021-05600-0
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Res Notes ISSN: 1756-0500
Fig. 1Functional annotation pipeline for E. okinawaensis midgut transcriptome assembly. To analyze the E. okinawaensis midgut transcriptome, we annotated the translated peptide sequence set through sequential BLASTP using several model organisms and Manduca sexta protein sequences, and we then also annotated the translated peptide sequence set via sequential BLASTP using 71 species of protein sequences obtained from the Ensembl Metazoa database. A functional gene annotation pipeline was used for the comparative pathway and gene enrichment analyses of eight species of stick insects using KEGG or Metascape. The stick insect species are as follows: a Aretaon asperrimus (male); b Entoria okinawaensis (female); c Clitarchus hookeri (female); d Ramulus artemis (female); e Medauroidea extradentata (female); f Peruphasma schultei (female); g Extatosoma tiaratum (female); and h Sipyloidea sipylus (female). The sequencer and text image drawings are from TogoTV (©2016 DBCLS TogoTV/CC-BY-4.0). Mr. Satoshi Goto from the Tabunoki laboratory gifted all image drawings of stick insects
Fig. 2Hierarchical clustering and Gene set enrichment analysis using Metascape of eight stick insect midgut transcriptomes. a Hierarchical clustering was performed using TIBCO Spotfire Desktop version 7.6.0. The heatmap is colored based on quartiles. In other words, the gene expression value was sorted in ascending order for each stick insect transcriptome. The first quartile was assigned the middle number between the smallest number and the median of the dataset (blue), and the third quartile was assigned the middle value between the median and the highest value of the dataset (yellow). Genes that did not correspond to E. okinawaensis are shown in gray as missing values. The pink-colored solid rectangles show the flightless-wingless species, the green-colored solid rectangles show the flight-winged species, and blue-colored dotted rectangles show the flightless-winged stick insect species. b Comparison between flight and flightless insects. c Comparison between winged and wingless insects. A bar graph of the enriched terms across genes with high expression in the flight or winged group is shown. The different color intensities indicate significance for the corresponding GO term
Fig. 3Comparison of the winged and wingless groups. a Differentially expressed transcripts are plotted based on the logarithm-transformed TPM (log TPM) values on the graph. The X-axis shows the wingless group, and the Y-axis shows the winged group. The gray-colored dots indicate transcripts with more than 2-fold differential expression in the comparison of the winged and wingless stick insects. The blue dots indicate significantly differentially expressed transcripts related to carbohydrate metabolic processes identified from the comparison of the winged and wingless groups. b Enolase and ENOSF1 mRNA expression in S. sipylus (flight-winged stick insect). c Enolase and ENOSF1 mRNA expression in E. okinawaensis (flightless-wingless stick insect). The relative mRNA expression levels in the fat body and midgut are presented as relative quantification (RQ) values. The RQ values show the relative expression levels calculated based on an expression value in the fat body equal to 1. The error bars represent the relative minimum/maximum expression levels of the mean RQ values. Rp49 was used as the endogenous control. Triplicate technical replicates were included in the study. eno enolase, sf1 ENOSF1, fb fat body, mg midgut