| Literature DB >> 33985520 |
Xiao-Yi Kuai1, Xiao-Han Yao2, Li-Juan Xu1, Yu-Qing Zhou1, Li-Ping Zhang1, Yi Liu3, Shao-Fang Pei4, Chun-Li Zhou5.
Abstract
Parkinson's disease (PD) is a neurodegenerative disorder and 70-80% of PD patients suffer from gastrointestinal dysfunction such as constipation. We aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) for treating PD related to gastrointestinal dysfunction. We conducted a prospective, single- study. Eleven patients with PD received FMT. Fecal samples were collected before and after FMT and subjected to 16S ribosomal DNA (rDNA) gene sequencing. Hoehn-Yahr (H-Y) grade, Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) score, and the Non-Motion Symptom Questionnaire (NMSS) were used to assess improvements in motor and non-motor symptoms. PAC-QOL score and Wexner constipation score were used to assess the patient's constipation symptoms. All patients were tested by the small intestine breath hydrogen test, performed before and after FMT. Community richness (chao) and microbial structure in before-FMT PD patients were significantly different from the after-FMT. We observed an increased abundance of Blautia and Prevotella in PD patients after FMT, while the abundance of Bacteroidetes decreased dramatically. After FMT, the H-Y grade, UPDRS, and NMSS of PD patients decreased significantly. Through the lactulose H2 breath test, the intestinal bacterial overgrowth (SIBO) in PD patients returned to normal. The PAC-QOL score and Wexner constipation score in after-FMT patients decreased significantly. Our study profiles specific characteristics and microbial dysbiosis in the gut of PD patients. FMT might be a therapeutic potential for reconstructing the gut microbiota of PD patients and improving their motor and non-motor symptoms.Entities:
Keywords: 16s rDNA sequencing; Constipation; FMT; Gut microbiota; Parkinson’s disease
Year: 2021 PMID: 33985520 PMCID: PMC8120701 DOI: 10.1186/s12934-021-01589-0
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Microb Cell Fact ISSN: 1475-2859 Impact factor: 5.328
Included patient characteristics at baseline
| Patient | Sex (F/M) | Age (years) | Disease duration (years) | BMI |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | F | 62 | 9 | 23.19 |
| 2 | M | 70 | 8 | 20.39 |
| 3 | M | 73 | 10 | 23.66 |
| 4 | F | 84 | 12 | 19.56 |
| 5 | F | 58 | 8 | 22.4 |
| 6 | M | 69 | 6 | 20.78 |
| 7 | F | 40 | 1 | 22.72 |
| 8 | M | 41 | 2 | 20.2 |
| 9 | M | 69 | 7 | 22.23 |
| 10 | M | 61 | 7 | 25.39 |
| 11 | M | 60 | 9 | 21.56 |
| Total (Mean ± SD) | NA | 62.45 ± 13.08 | 7.18 ± 3.25 | 22.01 ± 1.73 |
Outcome measures in the participants
| Before FMTa | 6 weeks After FMT | 12 weeks After FMT | p-value | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMI (mm/kg2) | 22.01 ± 1.73 | 23.52 ± 1.65 | 24.65 ± 1.09 | |
| H-Y Grade** | 2.27 ± 0.75 | 1.45 ± 0.82 | 1.09 ± 0.83 | |
| UPDRSII Score** | 11.36 ± 4.7 | 6.18 ± 3.6 | 4.90 ± 3.33 | |
| NMSS** | 22.36 ± 7.05 | 12.55 ± 5.54 | 10.36 ± 4.54 | |
| PAC-QOL score** | 102.55 ± 5.05 | 51.27 ± 6.71 | 43.45 ± 5.34 | < 0.0001 |
| Wexner constipation score* | 11.63 ± 3.22 | 8.16 ± 2.62 | 6.22 ± 1.03 | |
| HCY (μmol/L)** | 15.85 ± 2.89 | 12.74 ± 2.05 | 11.22 ± 1.85 | 0.002 |
| Alb (g/L) | 38.49 ± 3.92 | 40.38 ± 4.35 | 41.62 ± 4.26 | |
| UA (μmol/L) | 306.13 ± 75.94 | 282.09 ± 65.31 | 274.91 ± 55.73 | |
| OCTT (min)** | 150.91 ± 12.21 | NA | 105.45 ± 20.18 | < 0.0001 |
H-Y Grade: Hoehn-Yahr Grade, UPDRS II Score: Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale II Score. NMSS: non-motor symptom questionnaire, BMI: body mass index (mm/kg2), HCY: homocysteine, Alb: albumen, UA: uric acid
* p < 0.05 Before FMTvs 12 weeks After FMT in the same patient
** p < 0.01 Before FMTvs 12 weeks After FMT in the same patient
Clinical Assessment Before and After FMT for each patient
H-Y Grade:Hoehn-Yahr Grade, UPDRS II Score: Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale II Score. NMSS: non-motor symptom questionnaire
Treatment-related adverse events
| Adverse event | During treatment | During follow-up |
|---|---|---|
| Fever | 0 | 0 |
| Mild Diarrhea | 1 (9.1%) | 0 |
| Abdominal pain | 3 (27.3%) | 2 (18.2%) |
| Venting | 2 (18.2%) | 1 (9.1%) |
| Vomiting | 0 | 0 |
| Flatulence | 5 (45.5%) | 2 (18.2%) |
| Nausea | 3 (27.3%) | 0 |
| Throat irritation | 2 (18.2%) | 0 |
Fig. 1The lactulose H2 breath test in PD patients with FMT. a The average breath hydrogen before- and after-FMT. b The average orocecal transit time (OCTT) before and after-FMT (**p < 0.01)
Fig. 2Fecal Microbiota Analysis among healthy controls (marked as HC), PD patients before (marked as before FMT) and 12 weeks after FMT (marked as 12w after FMT). Alpha diversity indices, including a diversity (Shannon) and b community richness (chao), varied among each group. c Histogram of taxonomic profles LDA score of the gut microbiota among healthy controls,PD patients before and 12 weeks after FMT d Shotgun sequencing of fecal samples during diagnosis using the LEfSe analysis method with representative relative abundance among each group; and a cladogram representation of taxa enriched in gut microbiota among each group. e Associations of gut microbial species with clinical indices: Heat map of the Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient between 3 clinical indices and associated OTUs (Total = 35; control n = 13; before FMT, n = 11,12w after FMT, n = 11); Spearman’s rank correlation. (HC: healthy controls; *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; &denotes OTUs that significantly differed in abundance in 35 samples (two-tailed Wilcoxon rank-sum test, P < 0.05). BMI, Body Mass Index.)
Fig. 3Changes in taxonomic composition distribution in different samples of genus-level before- and after-FMT. a Distribution of top 30 species at the genus level; b Bacteroides. c Faecalibacterium. d Escherichia–Shigella. e Blautia. (**p < 0.01, vs Before FMT, *p < 0.05 vs Before FMT)