Kathryn E Hally1,2,3, Olivia M Parker1,3, Morgane M Brunton-O'Sullivan1,3, Scott A Harding3,4, Peter D Larsen1,2,3. 1. Department of Surgery and Anaesthesia, The University of Otago, Wellington, New Zealand. 2. School of Biological Sciences, Victoria University of Wellington, Wellington, New Zealand. 3. Wellington Cardiovascular Research Group, Wellington, New Zealand. 4. Department of Cardiology, Wellington Regional Hospital, Wellington, New Zealand.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Activation of both platelets and neutrophils can contribute to the risk of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) following acute myocardial infarction (AMI). Neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs) are an important product of the platelet-neutrophil axis and exaggerate vascular damage in cardiovascular disease. Additionally, activated platelets can drive NETosis and are directly linked to thromboembolic risk. Investigating the combined effect of biomarkers for NETosis and platelet activation represents a novel approach to risk prediction post-AMI. Here, we examined the utility of a composite biomarker score, inclusive of both pathways, for predicting MACE post-AMI. METHODS AND RESULTS: In a case-control design, 100 case patients who experienced MACE within 1 year of index admission were matched in a 1:2 ratio with control patients. Serum levels of myeloperoxidase-DNA, neutrophil elastase-DNA, and citrullinated histone H3 were assayed by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) as markers of NET burden. To measure platelet activation, soluble P-selectin was assayed by ELISA in parallel. Platelet and neutrophil counts were also recorded. Composite biomarker scores, inclusive of biomarkers for NETosis and platelet activation, were assessed using multivariate regression modeling. These composite biomarker scores were independent predictors of 1-year MACE. The strongest association with MACE was observed using a composite of platelet count, soluble P-selectin, and all NET markers (odds ratio: 1.94; 1.16-3.25). CONCLUSION: Here, we demonstrate the importance of combining biomarkers of NETosis and platelet activation for risk prediction in patients with AMI. Combining biomarkers from closely linked, but distinct, biological pathways was more effective than utilizing either type of biomarker alone. Thieme. All rights reserved.
BACKGROUND: Activation of both platelets and neutrophils can contribute to the risk of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) following acute myocardial infarction (AMI). Neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs) are an important product of the platelet-neutrophil axis and exaggerate vascular damage in cardiovascular disease. Additionally, activated platelets can drive NETosis and are directly linked to thromboembolic risk. Investigating the combined effect of biomarkers for NETosis and platelet activation represents a novel approach to risk prediction post-AMI. Here, we examined the utility of a composite biomarker score, inclusive of both pathways, for predicting MACE post-AMI. METHODS AND RESULTS: In a case-control design, 100 case patients who experienced MACE within 1 year of index admission were matched in a 1:2 ratio with control patients. Serum levels of myeloperoxidase-DNA, neutrophil elastase-DNA, and citrullinated histone H3 were assayed by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) as markers of NET burden. To measure platelet activation, soluble P-selectin was assayed by ELISA in parallel. Platelet and neutrophil counts were also recorded. Composite biomarker scores, inclusive of biomarkers for NETosis and platelet activation, were assessed using multivariate regression modeling. These composite biomarker scores were independent predictors of 1-year MACE. The strongest association with MACE was observed using a composite of platelet count, soluble P-selectin, and all NET markers (odds ratio: 1.94; 1.16-3.25). CONCLUSION: Here, we demonstrate the importance of combining biomarkers of NETosis and platelet activation for risk prediction in patients with AMI. Combining biomarkers from closely linked, but distinct, biological pathways was more effective than utilizing either type of biomarker alone. Thieme. All rights reserved.
Authors: Areez Shafqat; Saleha Abdul Rab; Osama Ammar; Sulaiman Al Salameh; Anas Alkhudairi; Junaid Kashir; Khaled Alkattan; Ahmed Yaqinuddin Journal: Front Med (Lausanne) Date: 2022-08-23