Tolga Aksu1, Mohit Turagam2, Sandeep Gautam3, Piotr Futyma4, Krishna Akella5, Erkan Baysal6, Serdar Bozyel7, Kivanc Yalin8, Deepak Padmanabhan9, Jayaprakash Shenthar9, Andrea Natale10, Dhanunjaya Lakkireddy5, Rakesh Gopinathannair5. 1. University of Health Sciences, Kocaeli Derince Training and Research Hospital, Department of Cardiology, Kocaeli, Turkey. Electronic address: tolga.aksu@yeditepe.edu.tr. 2. Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, NY, New York, USA. 3. Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, University of Missouri-Columbia, Columbia, MO, USA. 4. St. Joseph's Heart Rhythm Center, Rzeszów, Poland. 5. Kansas City Heart Rhythm Institute and Research Foundation, Overland Park, KS, USA. 6. SBU Diyarbakır Gazi Yaşargil Education and Research Hospital, Diyarbakır, Turkey. 7. University of Health Sciences, Kocaeli Derince Training and Research Hospital, Department of Cardiology, Kocaeli, Turkey. 8. Istanbul University-Cerrahpasa, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Cardiology, Istanbul, Turkey. 9. Sri Jayadeva Institute of Cardiovascular Sciences and Research, Bangalore, Karnataka, India. 10. Executive Medical Director, Texas Heart Rhythm Institute, Austin, TX, USA.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: The impact of cardioneuroablation (CNA) on ventricular repolarization by using corrected QT interval (QTc) measurements has been recently demonstrated. The effects of cardiac pacing (CP) on ventricular repolarization have not been studied in patients with vasovagal syncope (VVS). We sought to compare ventricular repolarization effects of CNA (group 1) with CP (group 2) in patients with VVS. METHODS: We enrolled 69 patients with age 38 ± 13 years (53.6% male), n = 47 in group 1 and n = 22 in group 2. Clinical diagnosis of cardioinhibitory type was supported by cardiac monitoring or tilt testing. QTc was calculated at baseline (time-1), at 24 h after ablation (time-2), and at 9-12 months (time-3) in the follow-up. RESULTS: In the group 1, from time-1 to time-2, a significant shortening in QTcFredericia (from 403 ± 27 to 382 ± 27 ms, p < 0.0001), QTcFramingham (from 402 ± 27 to 384 ± 27 ms, p < 0.0001), and QTcHodges (from 405 ± 26 to 388 ± 24 ms, p < 0.0001) was observed which remained lower than baseline in time-3 (373 ± 29, 376 ± 27, and 378 ± 27 ms, respectively). Although the difference between measurements in time-1 and time-2 was not statistically significant for QTcBazett, a significant shortening was detected between time-1 and time-3 (from 408 ± 30 to 394 ± 33, p = 0.005). In the group 2, there was no time-based changes on QTc measurements. In the linear mixed model analysis, the longitudinal reduction tendency in the QTcFredericia and QTcFramingham was more pronounced in group 1. CONCLUSIONS: Our results demonstrate that CNA reduces QTc levels through neuromodulation effect whereas CP has no effect on ventricular repolarization in patients with VVS.
INTRODUCTION: The impact of cardioneuroablation (CNA) on ventricular repolarization by using corrected QT interval (QTc) measurements has been recently demonstrated. The effects of cardiac pacing (CP) on ventricular repolarization have not been studied in patients with vasovagal syncope (VVS). We sought to compare ventricular repolarization effects of CNA (group 1) with CP (group 2) in patients with VVS. METHODS: We enrolled 69 patients with age 38 ± 13 years (53.6% male), n = 47 in group 1 and n = 22 in group 2. Clinical diagnosis of cardioinhibitory type was supported by cardiac monitoring or tilt testing. QTc was calculated at baseline (time-1), at 24 h after ablation (time-2), and at 9-12 months (time-3) in the follow-up. RESULTS: In the group 1, from time-1 to time-2, a significant shortening in QTcFredericia (from 403 ± 27 to 382 ± 27 ms, p < 0.0001), QTcFramingham (from 402 ± 27 to 384 ± 27 ms, p < 0.0001), and QTcHodges (from 405 ± 26 to 388 ± 24 ms, p < 0.0001) was observed which remained lower than baseline in time-3 (373 ± 29, 376 ± 27, and 378 ± 27 ms, respectively). Although the difference between measurements in time-1 and time-2 was not statistically significant for QTcBazett, a significant shortening was detected between time-1 and time-3 (from 408 ± 30 to 394 ± 33, p = 0.005). In the group 2, there was no time-based changes on QTc measurements. In the linear mixed model analysis, the longitudinal reduction tendency in the QTcFredericia and QTcFramingham was more pronounced in group 1. CONCLUSIONS: Our results demonstrate that CNA reduces QTc levels through neuromodulation effect whereas CP has no effect on ventricular repolarization in patients with VVS.