| Literature DB >> 33984560 |
Daniel E Garcia-Valle1, Luis A Bello-Pérez2, Edith Agama-Acevedo1, Jose Alvarez-Ramirez3.
Abstract
The influence of the pasta preparation stages on starch, proteins, and water structures of semolina and chickpea pasta was studied. The hydrated starch structures (995/1022 FTIR ratio) increased in semolina and reduced in chickpea pasta. The processing stages in semolina pasta led to a significant increase of β-sheet structures (~50% to ~68%). The β-sheet structures content in chickpea pasta was lower (~52%), and was most affected by sheeting and cooking. The water structure was assessed by the analysis of the OH fingerprint FTIR region (3700-2800 cm-1) and showing that water molecules (~90%) are strongly and moderately bound. The chickpea pasta displayed the highest content of strongly bonded water (about 55%) in contrast to the semolina pasta (~48%). A principal component analysis showed that the molecular organization of semolina pasta was mostly affected by dough formation and cooking; the molecular organization of chickpea pasta was determined by the cooking stage.Entities:
Keywords: Gluten-free pasta; Protein secondary structure; Starch structure; Water structure
Year: 2021 PMID: 33984560 DOI: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2021.129993
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Food Chem ISSN: 0308-8146 Impact factor: 7.514