Literature DB >> 33983756

Distal and proximal family contextual effects on adolescents' interparental conflict appraisals: A daily diary study.

Gregory M Fosco1, Devin M McCauley1, Carlie J Sloan1.   

Abstract

Adolescent appraisals of interparental conflict (IPC)-perceiving IPC as threatening to their well-being or that of the family, and self-blaming attributions-are well-established processes through which IPC confers risk for developmental disruptions and psychopathology. Recent work documents intraindividual change in IPC and appraisals that occur on a daily timescale. However, considerably less is known about how the broader family context may temper appraisals of IPC. This study provides a novel examination of the implications of distal (global ratings of family relationships in general) and proximal (fluctuations in daily family relationships) family context (family cohesion, parent-adolescent closeness, and parent-adolescent conflict) for adolescents' propensity to form negative appraisals of daily IPC. This sample included 144 adolescents (63% female) in two-parent families, who participated in a 21-day daily diary study. Findings indicate that intraindividual variability in adolescents' perception of family cohesion, parent-adolescent closeness, and parent-adolescent conflict all correspond to adolescent appraisals of IPC through direct relations and moderating effects. Unique patterns emerged for boys and girls, suggesting gender differences in how adolescents incorporate the family context into their appraisals of IPC. This study expands our awareness of the importance of daily fluctuations in family relationships for adolescent risk during exposure to IPC. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2021 APA, all rights reserved).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33983756      PMCID: PMC8719458          DOI: 10.1037/fam0000703

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Fam Psychol        ISSN: 0893-3200


  33 in total

1.  The inventory of parent and peer attachment: Individual differences and their relationship to psychological well-being in adolescence.

Authors:  G C Armsden; M T Greenberg
Journal:  J Youth Adolesc       Date:  1987-10

2.  Day-to-day Consistency in Positive Parent-Child Interactions and Youth Well-Being.

Authors:  Melissa A Lippold; Kelly D Davis; Katie M Lawson; Susan M McHale
Journal:  J Child Fam Stud       Date:  2016-08-19

3.  Marital conflict typology and children's appraisals: the moderating role of family cohesion.

Authors:  Kristin M Lindahl; Neena M Malik
Journal:  J Fam Psychol       Date:  2011-04

4.  Implications of Family Cohesion and Conflict for Adolescent Mood and Well-Being: Examining Within- and Between-Family Processes on a Daily Timescale.

Authors:  Gregory M Fosco; David M Lydon-Staley
Journal:  Fam Process       Date:  2019-12-04

5.  Profiles of cognitive appraisals and triangulation into interparental conflict: Implications for adolescent adjustment.

Authors:  Gregory M Fosco; Bethany C Bray
Journal:  J Fam Psychol       Date:  2016-03-10

6.  Reciprocal associations between family and peer conflict in adolescents' daily lives.

Authors:  Grace H Chung; Lisa Flook; Andrew J Fuligni
Journal:  Child Dev       Date:  2011-07-27

7.  The interparental relationship: Meta-analytic associations with children's maladjustment and responses to interparental conflict.

Authors:  Willemijn M van Eldik; Amaranta D de Haan; Lucia Q Parry; Patrick T Davies; Maartje P C M Luijk; Lidia R Arends; Peter Prinzie
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  2020-05-21       Impact factor: 17.737

8.  Are there individual and sibling differences in appraisals of interparental conflict?

Authors:  Rachel G Lucas-Thompson; Melissa W George
Journal:  J Fam Psychol       Date:  2017-04-10

9.  Identifying the temperamental roots of children's patterns of security in the interparental relationship.

Authors:  Patrick T Davies; Rochelle F Hentges; Melissa L Sturge-Apple
Journal:  Dev Psychopathol       Date:  2015-11-27

10.  Inter-parental conflict and children's academic attainment: a longitudinal analysis.

Authors:  Gordon T Harold; Jessica J Aitken; Katherine H Shelton
Journal:  J Child Psychol Psychiatry       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 8.982

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.