Literature DB >> 33983528

STRYDE versus PRECICE magnetic internal lengthening nail for femur lengthening.

Sherif Galal1,2, Jonggu Shin1, Peter Principe1, Nathan Khabyeh-Hasbani1, Rena Mehta1, Amber Hamilton1, S Robert Rozbruch1, Austin T Fragomen3.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Magnetic internal lengthening nails (MILNs) have been used for femoral lengthening to avoid complications associated with external fixation. The titanium version of the MILN (PRECICE®) has been in use since 2011 but had limitations (50-75 lb) in post-operative weight bearing. A new stainless-steel version of the MILN (STRYDE®) allows 150-250 lb of post-operative weight bearing. The aim is to compare the outcomes of using these two different MILNs for both unilateral and bilateral femoral lengthening.
METHODS: A single-center, retrospective cohort study was conducted in which patients' records were reviewed from the period from January 2017 to March 2020. A total of 66 femoral lengthening procedures were included in the study and were divided into two groups: STRYDE® group (30 femora) and PRECICE® group (36 femora). Outcomes assessed were the 6-months post-operative Limb Deformity-Scoliosis Research Society (LD-SRS) Score, adjacent joint range of motion (ROM), average distraction rate, bone healing index (BHI), and complications.
RESULTS: No statistically significant difference was found between the two groups in regard to the (LD-SRS) score, hip ROM, or knee ROM. Statistically significant differences were found between the two groups in regard to BHI (average of 0.84 months/cm and 0.67 months/cm for STRYDE® and PRECICE®, respectively) and distraction rate (average of 0.6 mm/day and 0.9 mm/day for STRYDE® and PRECICE®, respectively). No mechanical nail complications were reported in the STRYDE® group compared to three events of nail failure in the PRECICE® group. One femur in the PRECICE® group needed BMAC injection for delayed healing compared to four femurs in the STRYDE® group.
CONCLUSION: The STRYDE® MILN yields comparable functional results to those of PRECICE® MILN and shows fewer mechanical nail complications. However, STRYDE® MILN requires a slower distraction rate and yields slower healing (larger BHI). LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, Therapeutic study.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Femur; Intramedullary; Lengthening; PRECICE®; STRYDE®

Year:  2021        PMID: 33983528     DOI: 10.1007/s00402-021-03943-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg        ISSN: 0936-8051            Impact factor:   3.067


  3 in total

Review 1.  PRECICE intramedullary limb lengthening system.

Authors:  Dror Paley
Journal:  Expert Rev Med Devices       Date:  2015-02-18       Impact factor: 3.166

2.  Extracorporal noninvasive acute retraction of STRYDE® for continued lengthening in cases with limited nail stroke: a technical less invasive solution to reload the STRYDE®.

Authors:  F Schiedel
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2020-05-26       Impact factor: 3.067

3.  A Comparison of the Device-Related Complications of Intramedullary Lengthening Nails Using a New Classification System.

Authors:  Dong Hoon Lee; Sungmin Kim; Jung Woo Lee; Hoon Park; Tae Yoon Kim; Hyun Woo Kim
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2017-10-09       Impact factor: 3.411

  3 in total
  2 in total

1.  Letter to the editor on "STRYDE versus PRECICE magnetic internal lengthening nail for femur lengthening".

Authors:  Björn Vogt; Jan Duedal Rölfing; Robert Roedl; Adrien Frommer
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2021-07-22       Impact factor: 3.067

2.  Establishing content validity of LIMB-Q Kids: a new patient-reported outcome measure for lower limb deformities.

Authors:  Harpreet Chhina; Anne Klassen; David Bade; Jacek Kopec; Anthony Cooper
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2022-04-26       Impact factor: 3.440

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.