Michael Kotlyar1,2,3, Ryan Shanley4, Sheena R Dufresne1, Gretchen A Corcoran1, Kolawole S Okuyemi5, Anne M Mills1, Dorothy K Hatsukami2,3. 1. Department of Experimental and Clinical Pharmacology, College of Pharmacy, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA. 2. Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA. 3. Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA. 4. Biostatistics Core, Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA. 5. University of Utah, Department of Family and Preventive Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Bans of menthol characterizing flavor in cigarettes have been implemented in some localities and have been proposed more broadly. One proposed benefit of such a ban is to increase cessation rates among current menthol smokers. There is currently relatively limited data regarding how smoking behavior changes if menthol smokers switch to non-menthol cigarettes. AIMS AND METHODS: African American menthol smokers interested in quitting smoking were randomized to either continue smoking menthol (n = 60) or switch to non-menthol cigarettes (n = 62) for 1 month prior to a cessation attempt. Cessation results were reported previously; this analysis reports the results from the pre-cessation visits at which amount smoked, exhaled carbon monoxide (CO) concentration, urinary cotinine concentrations, and subjective measures were assessed. RESULTS: Over the 4-week study period, those switching to non-menthol (vs. continuing to smoke menthol) cigarettes smoked fewer cigarettes per day (mean ratio: 0.86; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.76, 0.98; p = .02), reported lower withdrawal symptom severity (mean difference -1.29; 95% CI: -2.6 to -0.01; p = .05) and higher perceived effectiveness of their skills for quitting smoking (mean difference 0.56; 95% CI: 0.02-1.10; p = .05). No significant differences were found between groups in exhaled CO, urinary cotinine concentrations, or most other subjective effects including support for a ban on menthol characterizing flavor in cigarettes. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that were menthol cigarettes no longer available, those that switch to non-menthol cigarettes would not change their smoking behavior in a way that is likely to be more hazardous, with some indicators suggesting that there may be some benefit.Clinicaltrials.gov # NCT02342327. IMPLICATIONS: A ban on menthol characterizing flavor in cigarettes has been proposed as a potential means by which to increase smoking cessation rates among current menthol cigarette smokers. This study evaluated how African American menthol cigarette smokers adjusted their smoking behavior after switching to non-menthol cigarettes. Although the overall differences between groups were modest, they were in a direction consistent with decreased smoking suggesting that current smokers would not adjust their behavior in a way that is likely to be more hazardous, with some indicators suggesting that there may be some benefits.
INTRODUCTION: Bans of menthol characterizing flavor in cigarettes have been implemented in some localities and have been proposed more broadly. One proposed benefit of such a ban is to increase cessation rates among current menthol smokers. There is currently relatively limited data regarding how smoking behavior changes if menthol smokers switch to non-menthol cigarettes. AIMS AND METHODS: African American menthol smokers interested in quitting smoking were randomized to either continue smoking menthol (n = 60) or switch to non-menthol cigarettes (n = 62) for 1 month prior to a cessation attempt. Cessation results were reported previously; this analysis reports the results from the pre-cessation visits at which amount smoked, exhaled carbon monoxide (CO) concentration, urinary cotinine concentrations, and subjective measures were assessed. RESULTS: Over the 4-week study period, those switching to non-menthol (vs. continuing to smoke menthol) cigarettes smoked fewer cigarettes per day (mean ratio: 0.86; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.76, 0.98; p = .02), reported lower withdrawal symptom severity (mean difference -1.29; 95% CI: -2.6 to -0.01; p = .05) and higher perceived effectiveness of their skills for quitting smoking (mean difference 0.56; 95% CI: 0.02-1.10; p = .05). No significant differences were found between groups in exhaled CO, urinary cotinine concentrations, or most other subjective effects including support for a ban on menthol characterizing flavor in cigarettes. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that were menthol cigarettes no longer available, those that switch to non-menthol cigarettes would not change their smoking behavior in a way that is likely to be more hazardous, with some indicators suggesting that there may be some benefit.Clinicaltrials.gov # NCT02342327. IMPLICATIONS: A ban on menthol characterizing flavor in cigarettes has been proposed as a potential means by which to increase smoking cessation rates among current menthol cigarette smokers. This study evaluated how African American menthol cigarette smokers adjusted their smoking behavior after switching to non-menthol cigarettes. Although the overall differences between groups were modest, they were in a direction consistent with decreased smoking suggesting that current smokers would not adjust their behavior in a way that is likely to be more hazardous, with some indicators suggesting that there may be some benefits.
Authors: Lauren R Pacek; F Joseph McClernon; Rachel L Denlinger-Apte; Melissa Mercincavage; Andrew A Strasser; Sarah S Dermody; Ryan Vandrey; Tracy T Smith; Natalie Nardone; Dorothy K Hatsukami; Joseph S Koopmeiners; Rachel V Kozink; Eric C Donny Journal: Tob Control Date: 2017-07-22 Impact factor: 7.552
Authors: Sharon E Murphy; Sung-Shim L Park; Elizabeth F Thompson; Lynne R Wilkens; Yesha Patel; Daniel O Stram; Loic Le Marchand Journal: Carcinogenesis Date: 2014-09-18 Impact factor: 4.944
Authors: Andrew A Strasser; Rebecca L Ashare; Madeline Kaufman; Kathy Z Tang; A Clementina Mesaros; Ian A Blair Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Date: 2013-01-18 Impact factor: 4.254
Authors: Amy M Cohn; Shyanika W Rose; Vinu Ilakkuvan; Tiffany Gray; Laurel Curry; Andrea C Villanti; Darren Mays; Eric Lindblom; Kenneth Tercyak; Charles Debnam; Ashley Mayo; Lexie Perreras Journal: Nicotine Tob Res Date: 2019-03-30 Impact factor: 4.244
Authors: Tameka S Lawler; Stephen B Stanfill; B Rey deCastro; Joseph G Lisko; Bryce W Duncan; Patricia Richter; Clifford H Watson Journal: Tob Regul Sci Date: 2017-04
Authors: Krysten W Bold; Peter Jatlow; Lisa M Fucito; Tore Eid; Suchitra Krishnan-Sarin; Stephanie O'Malley Journal: Tob Control Date: 2019-11-04 Impact factor: 7.552
Authors: Michael Kotlyar; Ryan Shanley; Sheena R Dufresne; Gretchen A Corcoran; Dorothy K Hatsukami Journal: Nicotine Tob Res Date: 2022-08-06 Impact factor: 5.825