| Literature DB >> 33982223 |
Liu-Dong Wei1, Chao Li1, Da Li1, Xing-Ju Liu1, Run-Ting Li1, Lian-Wang Li1, Jun-Mei Wang2, Da-Biao Zhou3.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Preoperative diagnosis of pituicytomas is difficult, and management and prognostic factors remain ambiguous. The purpose of this study was to elucidate the radiological characteristics of pituicytoma, to assess the risk factors affecting tumor progression, and to propose the optimal treatment regimen based on comprehensive analysis.Entities:
Keywords: Diagnosis; Oncology; Pituicytoma; Radiotherapy; Total resection; Treatment strategy
Mesh:
Year: 2021 PMID: 33982223 PMCID: PMC8416853 DOI: 10.1007/s11102-021-01152-5
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Pituitary ISSN: 1386-341X Impact factor: 4.107
Fig. 1The PRISMA flowchart shows the inclusion and exclusion processes used for analysis
Clinical features and demographics of patients with pituicytomas from our series and literature
| Variable | Current series (n = 22) | Prior studies (n = 93) | Overall (n = 115) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Value | No. of available cases | Value | No. of available cases | Value | |
| 93 | 115 | ||||
| Male | 11 (50%) | 49 (52.7%) | 60 (52.2%) | ||
| Female | 11 (50%) | 44 (47.3%) | 55 (47.8%) | ||
| 93 | 115 | ||||
| Median (range) | 49 (24–65) | 48 (7–83) | 48 (7–83) | ||
| Mean ± SD | 47.8 ± 9.6 | 47.8 ± 15.6 | 48.0 ± 14.6 | ||
| Main complaint | 91 | 113 | |||
| Visual | 14 (63.6%) | 49 (53.8%) | 63 (55.8%) | ||
| Headache | 8 (36.4%) | 33 (36.3%) | 41 (36.3%) | ||
| Decreased libido | 3 (13.6%) | 13 (14.3%) | 16 (14.2%) | ||
| Vertigo | 9 (40.9%) | 4 (4.4%) | 13 (11.5%) | ||
| Menstruation abnormality | 1 (4.5%) | 8 (8.8%) | 9 (8.0%) | ||
| Polydips; Polyuria | 1 (4.5%) | 6 (6.6%) | 7 (6.2%) | ||
| Endocrine disturbance | 10 (45.5%) | 59 (64.8%) | 69 (61.1%) | ||
| 71 | 93 | ||||
| TS | 9 (40.9%) | 52 (73.2%) | 61 (65.6%) | ||
| OT | 13 (59.1%) | 19 (26.8%) | 32 (34.4%) | ||
| 93 | 115 | ||||
| Non-GTR | 15 (68.2%) | 39 (41.9%) | 54 (47.0%) | ||
| GTR | 7 (31.8%) | 54 (58.1%) | 61 (53.0%) | ||
| Complicationsa | 55 | 75 | |||
| Visual worsening | 9 (45.0%) | 5 (9.1%) | 14 (18.7%) | ||
| Diabetes insipidus | 12 (60.0%) | 19 (34.5%) | 31 (41.3%) | ||
| Hypopituitarism | 18 (90.0%) | 22 (40.0%) | 40 (53.3%) | ||
| No complications | 1 (5.0%) | 22 (40.0%) | 23 (30.7%) | ||
| 93 | 115 | ||||
| Median (range) | 22 (5–86) | 24 (3–132) | 24 (3–132) | ||
| Mean ± SD | 31.3 ± 24.9 | 31.4 ± 28.5 | 31.3 ± 27.7 | ||
| Recurrence/progress | 6 (27.3%) | 93 | 16 (17.2%) | 115 | 22 (19.1%) |
| Death during follow up | 0 | 93 | 0 | 115 | 0 |
TS transsphenoidal surgery; OT open transcranial; GTR gross-total resection; SD standard deviation
aTwo patients who had previously undergone surgery at other hospitals were excluded because complications could not be obtained. The chief complaint, the surgical methods, and the extent of removal were obtained by inquiring the patient, consulting the medical records, and comparing the MRI before and after the surgery respectively. All of these were the data of the patient’s first visit
Fig. 2Brain magnetic resonance imaging showing flow void within the tumor. The mass mainly shows isointensity on axial T1WI (a) and T2WI (b); Postcontrast axial (c) and saggital (d) T1WI show a suprasellar lesion with a well-defined margins and obvious homogeneous enhancement. Note that within the mass there is a flow void (arrows in a–d) demonstrating the strong arterial supply of a highly vascularized tumor
Radiological and pathological features of pituicytomas in the combined data
| Variable | Numerical value |
|---|---|
| 112 | |
| Intrasellar | 28 (25.0%) |
| Suprasellar | 36 (32.1%) |
| Intrasellar + Suprasellar | 48 (42.9%) |
| 80 | |
| Solid | 66 (82.5%) |
| Solid + Cystic | 14 (17.5%) |
| 74 | |
| Median (range) | 20 (2–55) |
| Mean ± SD | 20.6 ± 9.8 |
| 52 | |
| Median (range) | 3.08 (0.019–31.94) |
| Mean ± SD | 4.78 ± 6.55 |
| 40 | |
| | |
| Isointense | 29 (72.5%) |
| Hypointense | 8 (20%) |
| Isointense to hypointense | 2 (5%) |
| Isointense to hyperintense | 1 (2.5%) |
| | |
| Hyperintense | 18 (45%) |
| Isointense | 14 (35%) |
| Isointense to hyperintense | 4 (10%) |
| Isointense to hypointense | 3 (7.5%) |
| Hypointense | 1 (2.5%) |
| | |
| Isointense T1& isointense T2 | 14 (35%) |
| Isointense T1& hyperintense T2 | 10 (25%) |
| Hypointense T1& hyperintense T2 | 7 (17.5%) |
| Isointense T1& iso- to hyperintense T2 | 3 (7.5%) |
| Isointense T1& hypointense T2 | 1 (2.5%) |
| Isointense T1& iso- to hypointense T2 | 1 (2.5%) |
| Hypointense T1& iso- to hypointense T2 | 1 (2.5%) |
| Iso- to hyperintense T1& iso- to hypointense T2 | 1 (2.5%) |
| Iso- to hypointense T1& hyperintense T2 | 1 (2.5%) |
| Iso- to hypointense T1& iso- to hyperintense T2 | 1 (2.5%) |
| | |
| Heterogeneous | 9 (22.5%) |
| Homogeneous | 31 (77.5%) |
| 14 | |
| Isodense | 11 (78.6%) |
| Hyperdense | 3 (21.4%) |
| No calcification | 14 (100%) |
| TTF-1 positive/negative | 51 (100%)/0 |
| S100 positive/negative | 85 (97.7%)/2 (2.3%) |
| Vimentin positive/negative | 45 (93.7%)/3 (6.3%) |
| GFAP positive/negative | 57 (69.5%)/25 (30.5%) |
| EMA positive/negative | 24 (38.7%)/38 (61.3%) |
| Synaptophy positive/negative | 11 (33.3%)/22 (66.7%) |
| Ki-67 | 53 |
| Median (range) | 2% (0.5–15%) |
| Mean ± SD | 3.0% ± 2.9% |
MRI magnetic resonance imaging; T1WI T1-weighted images; T2WI T2-weighted images; CT computed tomography; SD standard deviation; TTF‐1 thyroid transcription factor‐1; GFAP glial fibrillary acidic protein; EMA epithelial membrane antigen
Fig. 3Histopathological examination revealed the typical morphological and immunohistochemical features of pituicytoma. a and b HE staining showed that the tumor cells were spindle shaped, with unclear boundary, abundant cytoplasm, fine nuclear chromatin and dense interweaving, arranged in fascicles and storiform. c–e The tumor displayed diffuse immunoreactivity for TTF-1, S-100 protein and vimentin. f–h The tumor exhibited focal positive staining for GFAP and EMA, with a low Ki67 index. HE hematoxylin–eosin; TTF‐1 thyroid transcription factor‐1; GFAP glial fibrillary acidic protein; EMA epithelial membrane antigen
Fig. 4Statistically significant factors for time to progression. a TTP in the pooled cohort; b male and female groups; c TS and OT groups; d GTR and non-GTR groups. TTP time to progression; OT open transcranial; TS transsphenoidal surgery; GTR gross-total resection; EMTTP estimated mean time to progression
Univariate and multivariate Cox regression models for predicting risk factors of tumor progression
| Variable | No. of Cases | No. of Progression | 1-year PFR | 3-year PFR | 5-year PFR | Univariate Analysis | Multivariate Analysis | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HR (95% CI) | p Value | HR (95% CI) | p Value | ||||||
| Overall | 115 | 22 (19.1%) | 92.8% | 81.2% | 63.5% | ||||
| Male | 60 | 16 (26.7%) | 88.4% | 71.5% | 53.6% | 2.558 (1.000–6.544) | 0.039* | 2.855 (1.008–8.089) | 0.048* |
| Female | 55 | 6 (10.9%) | 97.7% | 91.8% | 75.3% | 1 | 1 | ||
| Age, per 1-year increase | 115 | 1.016 (0.985–1.048) | 0.310 | ||||||
| Major diameter, per 1-cm increase | 72 | 10 (13.9%) | 1.349 (0.703–2.588) | 0.368 | |||||
| Lesion volume, per 1-cm3 increase | 50 | 7 (14%) | 1.062 (0.981–1.150) | 0.135 | |||||
| Ki-67, per 1% increase | 53 | 9 (17%) | 1.084 (0.900–1.305) | 0.397 | |||||
| Solid | 66 | 14 (21.2%) | 91.1% | 75.5% | 63.4% | 1.100 (0.246–4.918) | 0.901 | ||
| Solid + Cystic | 14 | 2 (14.3%) | 88.9% | 88.9% | 44.4% | 1 | |||
| Intrasellar | 28 | 4 (14.3%) | 100% | 81.1% | NA | 0.465 (0.148–1.460) | 0.190 | ||
| Suprasellar | 36 | 4 (11.1%) | 96.3% | 80% | NA | 0.685 (0.217–2.160) | 0.518 | ||
| Intrasellar + Suprasellar | 48 | 12 (25%) | 85.7% | 82.3% | 62.5% | 1 | |||
| TS | 61 | 16 (26.2%) | 90.3% | 73.5% | 37.3% | 4.100 (1.179–14.262) | 0.027* | 3.559 (1.015–12.476) | 0.047* |
| OT | 32 | 3 (9.4%) | 95.8% | 88.5% | 77.4% | 1 | 1 | ||
| No RT | 109 | 22 (20.2%) | 92.3% | 79.8% | 60.7% | 22.837 (0.23–22,965.274) | 0.375 | ||
| RT | 6 | 0 | 100% | 100% | 100% | 1 | |||
| Non-GTR | 54 | 19 (35.2%) | 93.8% | 68.7% | 49.3% | 5.509 (1.622–18.711) | 0.006* | 4.388 (1.240–15.521) | 0.022* |
| GTR | 61 | 3 (4.9%) | 100% | 94.7% | 82.9% | 1 | 1 | ||
| Ki-67 < 3% | 31 | 5 (16.1%) | 91.5% | 91.5% | 65.3% | 0.852 (0.222–3.276) | 0.816 | ||
| Ki-67 ≥ 3% | 22 | 4 (18.2%) | 100% | 64.5% | NA | 1 | |||
PFR progression free rates; HR hazard ratio; CI confidence interval; cm, centimeter; NA not available; TS transsphenoidal surgery; OT open transcranial; GTR gross-total resection; RT radiotherapy
*p < 0.05
aRadiotherapy due to residual tumor. All of these were the data of the patient’s first visit
Fig. 5 Surgical management data for pituicytomas in the combined cohort. a data for patients undergoing initial surgery; b Classification of treatment after tumor progression. GTR gross-total resection; RT radiotherapy; NA not available
Univariate and Multivariable Analysis of Predictors of Gross Total Resection Following pituicytoma Surgery
| Variables | No. of Patients | No. of GTR | Univariate analysis | Multivariable analysis | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OR (95% CI) | p Value | No. of Patients | OR (95% CI) | p Value | |||
| Male | 60 | 33 (55%) | 1.179 (0.566–2.454) | 0.661 | |||
| Female | 55 | 28 (50.9%) | 1 | ||||
| Age, per 1-year increase | 115 | 1.015 (0.990–1.042) | 0.242 | ||||
| Major Diameter, per 1-cm increase | 72 | 0.548 (0.319–0.940) | 0.029* | ||||
| < 1.85 cm | 29 | 23 (79.3%) | 5.863 (1.978–17.38) | 0.001* | 19 | 4.859 (1.335–17.691) | 0.016* |
| ≥ 1.85 cm | 43 | 17 (39.5%) | 1 | 39 | 1 | ||
| Solid + Cystic | 14 | 9 (64.3%) | 2.160 (0.653–7.141) | 0.207 | |||
| Solid | 66 | 30 (45.5%) | 1 | ||||
| Intrasellar | 28 | 16 (57.1%) | 1.567 (0.616–4.032) | 0.349 | |||
| Suprasellar | 36 | 22 (61.1%) | 1.857 (0.772–4.470) | ||||
| Intrasellar + Suprasellar | 48 | 22 (45.8%) | 1 | ||||
| TS | 61 | 35 (57.4%) | 2.570 (1.057–6.250) | 0.037* | 34 | 1.791 (0.576–5.570) | 0.314 |
| OT | 32 | 11 (34.4%) | 1 | 24 | 1 | ||
TS transsphenoidal surgery; OT open transcranial; GTR gross-total resection
*p < 0.05. All of these were the data of the patient’s first visit
Univariate analysis of predictors of complications following pituicytoma surgery
| Variables | No. of Patients | No. of Incidence of complications | Univariate analysis | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| OR (95% CI) | p Value | |||
| Male | 39 | 29 (74.4%) | 1.639 (0.609–4.409) | 0.328 |
| Female | 36 | 23 (63.9%) | 1 | |
| Age, per 1-year increase | 75 | 1.001 (0.968–1.034) | 0.973 | |
| Major Diameter, per 1-cm increase | 51 | 0.886 (0.467–1.681) | 0.711 | |
| Solid + Cystic | 12 | 8 (66.7%) | 1.100 (0.286–4.228) | 0.89 |
| Solid | 48 | 33 (68.8%) | 1 | |
| Intrasellar | 15 | 8 (53.3%) | 0.468 (0.130–1.676) | 0.263 |
| Suprasellar | 27 | 21 (77.8%) | 1.432 (0.434–4.723) | |
| Intrasellar + Suprasellar | 31 | 22 (71.0%) | 1 | |
| OT | 28 | 23 (82.1%) | 3.185 (1.020–9.944) | 0.046* |
| TS | 44 | 26 (59.1%) | 1 | |
| Non-GTR | 35 | 26 (74.3%) | 1.556 (0.573–4.221) | 0.386 |
| GTR | 40 | 26 (65.0%) | 1 | |
TS transsphenoidal surgery; OT open transcranial; GTR gross-total resection
*p < 0.05. All of these were the data of the patient’s first visit
Univariate analysis of predictors of visual acuity deterioration following pituicytoma surgery
| Variables | No. of Patients | No. of Incidence of postoperative visual acuity deterioration | Univariate analysis | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| OR (95% CI) | p Value | |||
| Male | 39 | 9 (23.1%) | 1.860 (0.559–6.194) | 0.312 |
| Female | 36 | 5 (13.9%) | 1 | |
| Age, per 1-year increase | 75 | 1.008 (0.968–1.050) | 0.694 | |
| Major Diameter, per 1-cm increase | 51 | 1.216 (0.631–2.342) | 0.559 | |
| Solid + Cystic | 12 | 3 (25%) | 1.444 (0.324–6.436) | 0.630 |
| Solid | 48 | 9 (18.8%) | 1 | |
| Intrasellar | 15 | 1 (6.7%) | 0.371 (0.039–3.500) | 0.314 |
| Suprasellar | 27 | 7 (25.9%) | 1.820 (0.502–6.593) | |
| Intrasellar + Suprasellar | 31 | 5 (16.1%) | 1 | |
| OT | 28 | 13 (46.4%) | 37.267 (4.486–309.595) | 0.001* |
| TS | 44 | 1 (2.3%) | 1 | |
| Non-GTR | 35 | 9 (25.7%) | 2.423 (0.726–8.087) | 0.150 |
| GTR | 40 | 5 (12.5%) | 1 | |
TS transsphenoidal surgery; OT open transcranial; GTR gross-total resection
*p < 0.05. All of these were the data of the patient’s first visit