| Literature DB >> 33981761 |
Giancarlo Ranalli1, Pilar Bosch-Roig2, Simone Crudele1, Laura Rampazzi3,4, Cristina Corti3, Elisabetta Zanardini5.
Abstract
An innovative methodology is proposed, based on applied biotechnology to the recovery of altered stonework: the "dry biocleaning", which envisages the use of dehydrated microbial cells without the use of free water or gel-based matrices. This methodology can be particularly useful for the recovery of highly-ornamented stoneworks, which cannot be treated using the conventional cleaning techniques. The experimental plan included initial laboratory tests on Carrara marble samples, inoculated with dehydrated Saccharomyces cerevisiae yeast cells, followed by on-site tests performed on "Quattro Fontane" (The Four Fountains), a travertine monumental complex in Rome (Italy), on altered highly ornamented areas of about 1,000 cm2. The mechanism is based on the spontaneous re-hydration process due to the environmental humidity and on the metabolic fermentative activity of the yeast cells. Evaluation by physical-chemical analyses, after 18 hours of the biocleaning, confirmed a better removal of salts and pollutants, compared to both nebulization treatment and control tests (without cells). The new proposed on-site dry biocleaning technique, adopting viable yeast cells, represents a promising method that can be further investigated and optimized for recovering specific altered Cultural Heritage stoneworks. Copyright:Entities:
Keywords: cultural heritage; dry biocleaning; on-site biotreatment; stonework; yeast
Year: 2021 PMID: 33981761 PMCID: PMC8080898 DOI: 10.15698/mic2021.05.748
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Microb Cell ISSN: 2311-2638
Main physical-chemical and biological data on the surfaces of both the common carbonate stone (sample 1) and CH marble (sample 2) fragments, before (T0) and after (T48 hours) the dry biocleaning (DB) process, at the laboratory scale (three replicates, mean ± SD).
| 0-48 | 0-48 | 0-48 | |||||
| Color changes | |||||||
| ΔL* | 9.04 | 49.30 | 4.10 | ||||
| Δa* | 7.70 | −1.30 | −0.73 | ||||
| Δb* | 1.88 | 0.65 | −1.45 | ||||
| ΔE*ab | 12.60 | 49.80 | 4.40 | ||||
| Water absorption (g) | 0.3±0.1 | 0.4±0.1 | 0.8±0.3 | 1.4±0.5 | 0.8±0.2 | 0.9±0.3 | |
| pH surface | 6.9 | 6.1 | 6.9 | 6.3 | 6.9 | 6.9 | |
| Alcohol (%) | 0.0 | 0.15 | 0.0 | 0.10 | 0.0 | 0.0 | |
| Bacteria (CFU cm−2) | 3±1 | 1±1 | 2±2 | 2±1 | 2±2 | 2±1 | |
| Fungi (CFU cm−2) | 2±1 | 1±1 | 1±1 | 2±2 | 1±1 | 3±2 | |
| Yeasts (CFU cm−2) | 0 | 18±2 | 0 | 25±4 | 0 | 0 | |
| ATP (pg cm−2) | 13.3±2 | 2,100±15 | 7.2±5 | 3,700±22 | 5.3±3 | 7.3±2 | |
| Number of enzymes | 2 | 11 | 2 | 9 | 2 | 2 | |
On-site physical-chemical and biological characterization on The amounts of nitrate, sulfate, chloride, sodium, magnesium, calcium and potassium ions determined by IC analyses are reported in % w/w (three replicates, mean ± SD).
| 18 | 18 | 0 | ||
| Physical | Water absorption (g) | 3.2±0.4 | 3.4±0.5 | 1.8±0.4 |
| Color changes | DB | N | C | |
| ΔL* | 40.9 | 42.30 | 49.40 | |
| Δa* | 0.17 | −1.42 | −1.45 | |
| Δb* | 10.1 | −0.18 | 0.55 | |
| ΔE*ab | 42.20 | 42.55 | 49.90 | |
| Chemical | pH | 6.4±0.1 | 6.9±0.2 | 7.1±0.2 |
| Alcohol (%) | 0.30±0.1 | 0.00±0.1 | 0.00±0.1 | |
| Nitrate (NO3−) | 0.16±0.01 | 0.28±0.02 | 1.85±0.95 | |
| Sulfate (SO4 2−) | 2.20±0.40 | 2.65±0.30 | 10.60±1.7 | |
| Chloride (Cl−) | 0.03±0.01 | 0.03±0.01 | 0.38±0.10 | |
| Sodium (Na+) | 0.08±0.02 | 0.16±0.05 | 0.27±0.08 | |
| Magnesium (Mg2+) | 0.12±0.06 | 0.14±0.07 | 0.35±0.09 | |
| Calcium (Ca2+) | 0.42±0.02 | 2.23±0.08 | 4.41±0.20 | |
| Potassium (K+) | 0.05±0.01 | 0.07±0.01 | 0.18±0.02 | |
| Biological | Bacteria (TVBC) (CFU cm−2) | 1±2 | 1±1 | 4±2 |
| Fungi (CFU cm−2) | 3±2 | 1±2 | 5±2 | |
| Yeasts (CFU cm−2) | 19±3 | 1±1 | 1±1 | |
| ATP (pg cm−2) | 3,200±5.5 | 48±8 | 65±15 | |
| Number of enzymes | 8 | 1 | 3 |