Miklos L Auber1, Sijin Wen2, Gerald Hobbs3, Gerald M Higa1,4. 1. Department of Medicine, West Virginia University, Morgantown, West Virginia, USA. 2. Department of Biostatistics, West Virginia University, Morgantown, West Virginia, USA. 3. Department of Statistics, West Virginia University, Morgantown, West Virginia, USA. 4. Department of Clinical Pharmacy, West Virginia University, Morgantown, West Virginia, USA.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: In 2020, colorectal cancer will be the fourth most frequently diagnosed malignant neoplasm and the second leading cause of site-specific, cancer-related deaths in the USA. Notably, 80% of the new cases are, by staging criteria, potentially curable even those with completely resected stage 4 disease. If slightly more than half the losses can be attributed to metastatic disease at presentation, then the remaining portion of deaths may be linked to disease relapse after surgery and, if applicable, adjuvant chemotherapy. The inference that these therapies are not curative for a significant number of subjects poses a role for maintenance therapy. OBJECTIVE: To assess event-free survival (EFS) of patients who received capecitabine as maintenance therapy following treatment according to current guidelines. METHODS: Clinical outcomes data were collected for 35 subjects treated with capecitabine as maintenance therapy. Descriptive statistical analyses were conducted on collective data related to duration of maintenance therapy and disease or clinical status from surgery to initial event. Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test were used to analyze EFS and overall survival. RESULTS: Of the entire cohort, 26 subjects have no evidence of disease (NED), a median of 5.5 years from surgery. Kaplan-Meier analyses indicated a 5-year EFS rate of 74% (95% CI: 60-90%). Eighteen of these 26 patients received capecitabine ≥30 months. Eight of the 17 subjects treated with capecitabine therapy for <30 months developed progressive disease; the majority of the relapses occurred within 20 months of surgery. The difference between the two groups was statistically significant. Six subjects died, only two of who had metastatic disease at the time of death; the other four had NED at least 4 years from surgery. Five patients with resected stage 4 disease who received capecitabine as maintenance therapy were alive >5 years from surgery. CONCLUSION: The findings and analyses of this cohort of patients suggest that maintenance capecitabine therapy reduces the risk of disease progression and cancer-related death.
INTRODUCTION: In 2020, colorectal cancer will be the fourth most frequently diagnosed malignant neoplasm and the second leading cause of site-specific, cancer-related deaths in the USA. Notably, 80% of the new cases are, by staging criteria, potentially curable even those with completely resected stage 4 disease. If slightly more than half the losses can be attributed to metastatic disease at presentation, then the remaining portion of deaths may be linked to disease relapse after surgery and, if applicable, adjuvant chemotherapy. The inference that these therapies are not curative for a significant number of subjects poses a role for maintenance therapy. OBJECTIVE: To assess event-free survival (EFS) of patients who received capecitabine as maintenance therapy following treatment according to current guidelines. METHODS: Clinical outcomes data were collected for 35 subjects treated with capecitabine as maintenance therapy. Descriptive statistical analyses were conducted on collective data related to duration of maintenance therapy and disease or clinical status from surgery to initial event. Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test were used to analyze EFS and overall survival. RESULTS: Of the entire cohort, 26 subjects have no evidence of disease (NED), a median of 5.5 years from surgery. Kaplan-Meier analyses indicated a 5-year EFS rate of 74% (95% CI: 60-90%). Eighteen of these 26 patients received capecitabine ≥30 months. Eight of the 17 subjects treated with capecitabine therapy for <30 months developed progressive disease; the majority of the relapses occurred within 20 months of surgery. The difference between the two groups was statistically significant. Six subjects died, only two of who had metastatic disease at the time of death; the other four had NED at least 4 years from surgery. Five patients with resected stage 4 disease who received capecitabine as maintenance therapy were alive >5 years from surgery. CONCLUSION: The findings and analyses of this cohort of patients suggest that maintenance capecitabine therapy reduces the risk of disease progression and cancer-related death.
Authors: Al B Benson; Alan P Venook; Lynette Cederquist; Emily Chan; Yi-Jen Chen; Harry S Cooper; Dustin Deming; Paul F Engstrom; Peter C Enzinger; Alessandro Fichera; Jean L Grem; Axel Grothey; Howard S Hochster; Sarah Hoffe; Steven Hunt; Ahmed Kamel; Natalie Kirilcuk; Smitha Krishnamurthi; Wells A Messersmith; Mary F Mulcahy; James D Murphy; Steven Nurkin; Leonard Saltz; Sunil Sharma; David Shibata; John M Skibber; Constantinos T Sofocleous; Elena M Stoffel; Eden Stotsky-Himelfarb; Christopher G Willett; Christina S Wu; Kristina M Gregory; Deborah Freedman-Cass Journal: J Natl Compr Canc Netw Date: 2017-03 Impact factor: 11.908
Authors: Lieke H J Simkens; Harm van Tinteren; Anne May; Albert J ten Tije; Geert-Jan M Creemers; Olaf J L Loosveld; Felix E de Jongh; Frans L G Erdkamp; Zoran Erjavec; Adelheid M E van der Torren; Jolien Tol; Hans J J Braun; Peter Nieboer; Jacobus J M van der Hoeven; Janny G Haasjes; Rob L H Jansen; Jaap Wals; Annemieke Cats; Veerle A Derleyn; Aafke H Honkoop; Linda Mol; Cornelis J A Punt; Miriam Koopman Journal: Lancet Date: 2015-04-07 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Young-Ho Kim; Zsolt Petko; Slavomir Dzieciatkowski; Li Lin; Mahan Ghiassi; Steve Stain; William C Chapman; Mary Kay Washington; Joseph Willis; Sanford D Markowitz; William M Grady Journal: Genes Chromosomes Cancer Date: 2006-08 Impact factor: 5.006
Authors: Beat Thürlimann; Aparna Keshaviah; Alan S Coates; Henning Mouridsen; Louis Mauriac; John F Forbes; Robert Paridaens; Monica Castiglione-Gertsch; Richard D Gelber; Manuela Rabaglio; Ian Smith; Andrew Wardley; Andrew Wardly; Karen N Price; Aron Goldhirsch Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2005-12-29 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Hongchao Pan; Richard Gray; Jeremy Braybrooke; Christina Davies; Carolyn Taylor; Paul McGale; Richard Peto; Kathleen I Pritchard; Jonas Bergh; Mitch Dowsett; Daniel F Hayes Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2017-11-09 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: E Van Cutsem; A Cervantes; R Adam; A Sobrero; J H Van Krieken; D Aderka; E Aranda Aguilar; A Bardelli; A Benson; G Bodoky; F Ciardiello; A D'Hoore; E Diaz-Rubio; J-Y Douillard; M Ducreux; A Falcone; A Grothey; T Gruenberger; K Haustermans; V Heinemann; P Hoff; C-H Köhne; R Labianca; P Laurent-Puig; B Ma; T Maughan; K Muro; N Normanno; P Österlund; W J G Oyen; D Papamichael; G Pentheroudakis; P Pfeiffer; T J Price; C Punt; J Ricke; A Roth; R Salazar; W Scheithauer; H J Schmoll; J Tabernero; J Taïeb; S Tejpar; H Wasan; T Yoshino; A Zaanan; D Arnold Journal: Ann Oncol Date: 2016-07-05 Impact factor: 32.976
Authors: Jonas A de Souza; Blase Polite; Monica Perkins; Neal J Meropol; Mark J Ratain; Lee N Newcomer; G Caleb Alexander Journal: BMC Health Serv Res Date: 2012-12-29 Impact factor: 2.655
Authors: K K H Goey; S G Elias; H van Tinteren; M M Laclé; S M Willems; G J A Offerhaus; W W J de Leng; E Strengman; A J Ten Tije; G-J M Creemers; A van der Velden; F E de Jongh; F L G Erdkamp; B C Tanis; C J A Punt; M Koopman Journal: Ann Oncol Date: 2017-09-01 Impact factor: 32.976