| Literature DB >> 33980996 |
Seydina M Diene1,2, Lucile Pinault3,2, Sophie Alexandra Baron3,2, Saïd Azza1,2, Nicholas Armstrong3,2, Linda Hadjadj1,2, Eric Chabrière1,2, Jean-Marc Rolain1,2, Pierre Pontarotti1,2,4, Didier Raoult5,6.
Abstract
Thienamycin, the first representative of carbapenem antibiotics was discovered in the mid-1970s from soil microorganism, Streptomyces cattleya, during the race to discover inhibitors of bacterial peptidoglycan synthesis. Chemically modified into imipenem (N-formimidoyl thienamycin), now one of the most clinically important antibiotics, thienamycin is encoded by a thienamycin gene cluster composed of 22 genes (thnA to thnV) from S. cattleya NRRL 8057 genome. Interestingly, the role of all thn-genes has been experimentally demonstrated in the thienamycin biosynthesis, except thnS, despite its annotation as putative β-lactamase. Here, we expressed thnS gene and investigated its activities against various substrates. Our analyses revealed that ThnS belonged to the superfamily of metallo-β-lactamase fold proteins. Compared to known β-lactamases such as OXA-48 and NDM-1, ThnS exhibited a lower affinity and less efficiency toward penicillin G and cefotaxime, while imipenem is more actively hydrolysed. Moreover, like most MBL fold enzymes, additional enzymatic activities of ThnS were detected such as hydrolysis of ascorbic acid, single strand DNA, and ribosomal RNA. ThnS appears as a MBL enzyme with multiple activities including a specialised β-lactamase activity toward imipenem. Thus, like toxin/antitoxin systems, the role of thnS gene within the thienamycin gene cluster appears as an antidote against the produced thienamycin.Entities:
Year: 2021 PMID: 33980996 PMCID: PMC8115136 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-89600-x
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1Genetic environment of the thienamycin gene cluster from the megaplasmid of Streptomyces cattleya NRRL8057.
Figure 2Phylogenetic relationship of ThnS with bacterial β-lactamases. (A) phylogenetic tree analysis of the ThnS protein with described bacterial β-lactamase sequences; (B) protein alignment of ThnS with class B β-lactamase sequences exhibiting the conserved motif and residues of this class. The phylogenetic tree was inferred using the maximum-likelihood method in FastTree then displayed using the FigTree software v1.4.4 (http://tree.bio.ed.ac.uk/software/figtree/).
Figure 3Monitoring the degradation of β-lactam drugs by the expressed ThnS enzyme compared to known bacterial β-lactamases (OXA-48 and NDM-1). (A) detection of Penicillin G over 24 h in presence or absence of the tested enzymes; (B) detection of the penicillin G metabolite (benzyl penilloic acid) when Penicillin G is incubated with the tested enzymes over 24 h; (C) monitoring the amount of imipenem when incubated with the tested enzymes over 24 h; (D) monitoring the amount of imipenem metabolite (imipenemoic acid) when imipenem is incubated with the tested enzymes over 24 h; (E) monitoring the amount of cefotaxime when incubated with the tested enzymes over 24 h.
Figure 43D model of the ThnS enzyme and monitoring ascorbic acid degradation by ThnS. (A) 3D structure comparison of the ThnS Phyre2 model and the UlaG structure (PDB: 2WYM); (B) 3D model of ThnS showing common residues in the catalytic site with the UlaG enzyme; structure alignment and visualisation were performed using the PyMOL 1.8.6.0 software (https://github.com/schrodinger/pymol-open-source). (C) monitoring ascorbic acid degradation by ThnS using LC–MS. OXA-48 carbapenemase enzyme is used here as a negative enzyme control.
Figure 5Nuclease and ribonuclease activities of the purified ThnS enzyme. (A) Degradation of bacterial total RNAs by the ThnS enzyme in the presence and absence of metallo-β-lactamase inhibitor (EDTA). GO (Glycine Oxidase) is used here as negative control enzyme; (B) Nuclease activity of ThnS on dsDNA; (C) Nuclease activity of ThnS on forward ssDNA ; (D) Nuclease activity of ThnS on reverse ssDNA. The ThnS activity was tested in the presence and absence of a metallo-β-lactamase inhibitor (EDTA). Glycine Oxidase (GO) and DNAse enzymes were used here as negative and positive controls, respectively. “Blank” refers to the empty vector eluted under the same conditions as that of the expressed ThnS enzyme.