Patrick Spraider1, Gabriel Putzer2, Robert Breitkopf2, Julia Abram2, Simon Mathis2, Bernhard Glodny3, Judith Martini2. 1. Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Medical University Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria. patrick.spraider@i-med.ac.at. 2. Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Medical University Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria. 3. Department of Radiology, Medical University Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Flow-controlled ventilation (FCV) is a novel ventilation method increasingly being used clinically, particularly during the current COVID-19 pandemic. However, the continuous flow pattern in FCV during inspiration and expiration has a significant impact on respiratory parameters and ventilatory settings compared to conventional ventilation modes. In addition, the constant flow combined with direct intratracheal pressure measurement allows determination of dynamic compliance and ventilation settings can be adjusted accordingly, reflecting a personalized ventilation approach. CASE PRESENTATION: A 50-year old women with confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection suffering from acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) was admitted to a tertiary medical center. Initial ventilation occurred with best standard of care pressure-controlled ventilation (PCV) and was then switched to FCV, by adopting PCV ventilator settings. This led to an increase in oxygenation by 30 %. Subsequently, to reduce invasiveness of mechanical ventilation, FCV was individualized by dynamic compliance guided adjustment of both, positive end-expiratory pressure and peak pressure; this intervention reduced driving pressure from 18 to 12 cm H2O. However, after several hours, compliance further deteriorated which resulted in a tidal volume of only 4.7 ml/kg. CONCLUSIONS: An individualized FCV approach increased oxygenation parameters in a patient suffering from severe COVID-19 related ARDS. Direct intratracheal pressure measurements allow for determination of dynamic compliance and thus optimization of ventilator settings, thereby reducing applied and dissipated energy. However, although desirable, this personalized ventilation strategy may reach its limits when lung function is so severely impaired that patient's oxygenation has to be ensured at the expense of lung protective ventilation concepts.
BACKGROUND: Flow-controlled ventilation (FCV) is a novel ventilation method increasingly being used clinically, particularly during the current COVID-19 pandemic. However, the continuous flow pattern in FCV during inspiration and expiration has a significant impact on respiratory parameters and ventilatory settings compared to conventional ventilation modes. In addition, the constant flow combined with direct intratracheal pressure measurement allows determination of dynamic compliance and ventilation settings can be adjusted accordingly, reflecting a personalized ventilation approach. CASE PRESENTATION: A 50-year old women with confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection suffering from acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) was admitted to a tertiary medical center. Initial ventilation occurred with best standard of care pressure-controlled ventilation (PCV) and was then switched to FCV, by adopting PCV ventilator settings. This led to an increase in oxygenation by 30 %. Subsequently, to reduce invasiveness of mechanical ventilation, FCV was individualized by dynamic compliance guided adjustment of both, positive end-expiratory pressure and peak pressure; this intervention reduced driving pressure from 18 to 12 cm H2O. However, after several hours, compliance further deteriorated which resulted in a tidal volume of only 4.7 ml/kg. CONCLUSIONS: An individualized FCV approach increased oxygenation parameters in a patient suffering from severe COVID-19 related ARDS. Direct intratracheal pressure measurements allow for determination of dynamic compliance and thus optimization of ventilator settings, thereby reducing applied and dissipated energy. However, although desirable, this personalized ventilation strategy may reach its limits when lung function is so severely impaired that patient's oxygenation has to be ensured at the expense of lung protective ventilation concepts.
Authors: Allan J Walkey; Lorenzo Del Sorbo; Carol L Hodgson; Neill K J Adhikari; Hannah Wunsch; Maureen O Meade; Elizabeth Uleryk; Dean Hess; Daniel S Talmor; B Taylor Thompson; Roy G Brower; Eddy Fan Journal: Ann Am Thorac Soc Date: 2017-10
Authors: Matthias Briel; Maureen Meade; Alain Mercat; Roy G Brower; Daniel Talmor; Stephen D Walter; Arthur S Slutsky; Eleanor Pullenayegum; Qi Zhou; Deborah Cook; Laurent Brochard; Jean-Christophe M Richard; Francois Lamontagne; Neera Bhatnagar; Thomas E Stewart; Gordon Guyatt Journal: JAMA Date: 2010-03-03 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: L Gattinoni; T Tonetti; M Cressoni; P Cadringher; P Herrmann; O Moerer; A Protti; M Gotti; C Chiurazzi; E Carlesso; D Chiumello; M Quintel Journal: Intensive Care Med Date: 2016-09-12 Impact factor: 17.440
Authors: Ary Serpa Neto; Rodrigo Octavio Deliberato; Alistair E W Johnson; Lieuwe D Bos; Pedro Amorim; Silvio Moreto Pereira; Denise Carnieli Cazati; Ricardo L Cordioli; Thiago Domingos Correa; Tom J Pollard; Guilherme P P Schettino; Karina T Timenetsky; Leo A Celi; Paolo Pelosi; Marcelo Gama de Abreu; Marcus J Schultz Journal: Intensive Care Med Date: 2018-10-05 Impact factor: 17.440
Authors: Johannes Schmidt; Christin Wenzel; Sashko Spassov; Silke Borgmann; Ziwei Lin; Jakob Wollborn; Jonas Weber; Jörg Haberstroh; Stephan Meckel; Sebastian Eiden; Steffen Wirth; Stefan Schumann Journal: Crit Care Med Date: 2020-03 Impact factor: 7.598
Authors: Robert H Bartlett; Mark T Ogino; Daniel Brodie; David M McMullan; Roberto Lorusso; Graeme MacLaren; Christine M Stead; Peter Rycus; John F Fraser; Jan Belohlavek; Leonardo Salazar; Yatin Mehta; Lakshmi Raman; Matthew L Paden Journal: ASAIO J Date: 2020-05 Impact factor: 2.872
Authors: Álmos Schranc; Ádám L Balogh; John Diaper; Roberta Südy; Ferenc Peták; Walid Habre; Gergely Albu Journal: Front Pediatr Date: 2022-09-09 Impact factor: 3.569