Xiaojun Chen1, Meng Cai1, Xiaofeng Lei1, Jin Yu1. 1. Department of Anesthesiology, Chongqing Health Center for Women and Children, Yubei District. Chongqing, China.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: This study aims to estimate the EC50 of ropivacaine when co-administered with dexmedetomidine for epidural labor analgesia in antepartum obese and non-obese parturients. METHODS: Sixty parturients scheduled for epidural labor analgesia were enrolled and divided into antepartum obesity (AO) and control (CON) groups, according to their body mass index at labor. Both groups received 0.5 µg/mL dexmedetomidine with ropivacaine as anesthetics. The concentration of ropivacaine was initially set at 0.125% and varied by 0.01% according to the up-and-down rule for sequential allocation. Hemodynamic parameters were monitored and pain intensity was assessed using a visual analog scale. RESULTS: When co-administered with dexmedetomidine, the EC50 of ropivacaine was 0.095% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.090-0.100%) and 0.070% (95% CI: 0.062-0.076%) in CON and AO groups, respectively. There was a significant difference between the two groups (P < 0.001). EC95 values of ropivacaine were 0.084% (95% CI: 0.077-0.122%) and 0.106% (95% CI: 0.101-0.128%) in AO and CON groups, respectively. CONCLUSION: Patients with antepartum obese may require decreased ropivacaine concentration for epidural labor analgesia when co-administered with 0.5 µg/mL dexmedetomidine.
OBJECTIVES: This study aims to estimate the EC50 of ropivacaine when co-administered with dexmedetomidine for epidural labor analgesia in antepartum obese and non-obese parturients. METHODS: Sixty parturients scheduled for epidural labor analgesia were enrolled and divided into antepartum obesity (AO) and control (CON) groups, according to their body mass index at labor. Both groups received 0.5 µg/mL dexmedetomidine with ropivacaine as anesthetics. The concentration of ropivacaine was initially set at 0.125% and varied by 0.01% according to the up-and-down rule for sequential allocation. Hemodynamic parameters were monitored and pain intensity was assessed using a visual analog scale. RESULTS: When co-administered with dexmedetomidine, the EC50 of ropivacaine was 0.095% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.090-0.100%) and 0.070% (95% CI: 0.062-0.076%) in CON and AO groups, respectively. There was a significant difference between the two groups (P < 0.001). EC95 values of ropivacaine were 0.084% (95% CI: 0.077-0.122%) and 0.106% (95% CI: 0.101-0.128%) in AO and CON groups, respectively. CONCLUSION: Patients with antepartum obese may require decreased ropivacaine concentration for epidural labor analgesia when co-administered with 0.5 µg/mL dexmedetomidine.
Entities:
Keywords:
Dexmedetomidine; labor analgesia; median effective concentration; obesity; ropivacaine