| Literature DB >> 33979369 |
Jonas Alves de Araujo Junior1, Daniele Andreza Antonelli Rossi1, Taina Fabri Carneiro Valadão1, Juliana Cristina Milan-Mattos2, Aparecida Maria Catai2, Tatiana de Oliveira Sato2, Joao Carlos Hueb1, Silmeia Garcia Zanati Bazan1, Paula Oliveira Montandon Hokama1, Newton Key Hokama1, Meliza Goi Roscani1,3.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Physical inactivity is an important risk factor for cardiovascular disease. The benefits of exercise in patients with chronic diseases, including cardiovascular diseases, are well established. For patients with sickle cell disease, medical recommendation was to avoid physical exercise for fear of triggering painful crises or increasing the impairment of the cardiopulmonary function. Only recently, studies have shown safety in exercise programs for this population. Despite that, there is no report that assess the effects of physical exercise on cardiac parameters in patients with sickle cell disease.Entities:
Year: 2021 PMID: 33979369 PMCID: PMC8115779 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0250128
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Fig 1CONSORT 2010 flow diagram.
Comparison of the demographic, clinical and laboratory characteristics of the control (CON) and exercise (EXE) groups at the initial moment of the study (M0).
| Variable | CON (n = 13) | EXE (n = 14) | p |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age (years) | 29.8 ± 10.2 | 29.1 ± 8.6 | 0.57 |
| Gender (Men/Women) (n/%) | 8 (61.5%)/ 5 (39.5%) | 5 (35.7%)/ 9 (64.3%) | 0.78 |
| Race (Afro descendant) (n/%) | 13 (100%) | 14 (100%) | - |
| Smoking | - | - | - |
| Alcoholism | - | - | - |
| Hemoglobin (g/dl) | 9.3 ± 1.9 | 9.6 ± 2.2 | 0.81 |
| Drugs | |||
| • Hydroxyurea (n/%) | 3 (23.1%) | 5 (35.7%) | 0.17 |
| • Folic Acid (n/%) | 13 (100%) | 12 (87.5%) | 0.16 |
| BMI (Kg/m2) | 22.2 ± 5 | 20 ± 4.3 | 0.55 |
| Entities | |||
| • SS (n/%) | 8 (61.5%) | 7 (50%) | |
| • SC (n/%) | 3 (23.1%) | 3 (21.4%) | 0.22 |
| • Sβ0 (n/%) | 1 (7.7%) | 4 (28.6%) | |
| • Sβ+ (n/%) | 1 (7.7%) | - | |
| Transfusions | |||
| • Not transfused (n/%) | 5 (38.5%) | 5 (35.7%) | 0.36 |
| • 1 to 10 transfusions (n/%) | 3 (23.1%) | 7 (50%) | |
| • + than 10 transfusions (n/%) | 5 (38.5%) | 2 (14.3%) | |
| Hospitalizations | |||
| • Without Hospitalizations (n/%) | 1 (7.7%) | 6 (42.8%) | 0.17 |
| • 1 to 10 Hospitalizations (n/%) | 8 (61.5%) | 2 (14.4%) | |
| • + than 10 Hospitalizations (n/%) | 4 (30.8%) | 6 (42.8%) |
Values presented in mean ± standard deviation or number of individuals and percentage. BMI = Body Mass Index; SS (Sickle Cell Homozigous Anemia); SC (Hemoglobinopathy SC); Sβ0 (Sickle Cell Beta 0 Thalassemia Double Heterozigous); Sβ+ (Sickle Cell Beta 0 Thalassemia Double Heterozigous) SAH = Systemic Arterial Hypertension; DMII = Type 2 diabetes mellitus; CAD = Known Coronary Artery Disease. Continuous variables were compared by Student T Test. Significance level P <0.05.
Comparison of the variables of the ergometric test between the groups (CON and EXE) at time points M0 and M2.
| Variable | CON n = 13 | EXE n = 14 | P | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| M0 | M2 | M0 | M2 | Interaction Time*Group | |
| Resting HR (bpm) | 76±3 | 76±3 | 80±3 | 72±3 | 0.23 |
| Maximum HR (bpm) | 163±4 | 166±3 | 179±3 | 182±1.4 | 0.95 |
| Resting SBP (mmHg) | 109±3 | 114±3 | 115±2 | 114±3 | 0.32 |
| Maximum SBP (mmHg) | 155±5 | 157±5 | 161±4 | 165±4 | 0.84 |
| Distance (m) | 552±160 | 586±217 | 809±232 | 1020±253 | <0.01 |
| % of patients with ST-segment depression (n) | 46.2±5 (6) | 46.2±5.1 (6) | 35.7±9 (5) | 14.3±3.6 (3) | 0.07 |
Values presented as mean ± standard deviation. HR = heart rate; SBP: systolic blood pressure; distance: maximum distance traveled during the test; ST-segment depression = % of patients with; ejection fraction: indicative of myocardial ischemia. Comparisons were performed using two-way ANOVA with p <0.05.
Comparison of functional echocardiographic variables between the groups (CON and EXE) at time points M0 and M2.
| Variable | CON | EXE | p | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| n = 13 | n = 14 | ||||
| M0 | M2 | M0 | M2 | Interaction Time*Group | |
| Tissue Mitral S | 9±2.3 | 13.1±5 | 9.2±1 | 9.8±2 | 0.04 |
| Ejection Fraction % | 60.9±10 | 63.0±9 | 66.8±7 | 74.0±6 | <0.01 |
| Mitral E (cm/s) | 94.1±24 | 92.5±25 | 91.8±22 | 96.1±25 | 0.40 |
| Mitral A (cm/s) | 53.2±14a | 57.5±15 | 50.9±18 | 53.7±15 | 0.69 |
| E/A | 1.82±0.5a | 1.64±0.2 | 1.92±0.6 | 1.88±0.6 | 0.42 |
| Mitral E’ (cm/s) | 11.9±3 | 11±2 | 11.6±3 | 13.6±2 | 0.04 |
| Mitral E/E’ | 8.2±1.4 | 8.5±2 | 8.5±0.6 | 7.1±2 | 0.38 |
| LAV (mm/m2) | 32.4±10 | 32.5±10 | 27.9±8 | 31.9±12 | 0.04 |
| LA Diameter (mm) | 36.8±1.4 | 35.1±1.4 | 36.3±1.4 | 37.5±1.4 | 0.31 |
| Tricúspid S (cm/s) | 14.5±3 | 13.2±3 | 14.1±3 | 15.7±3 | 0.07 |
| Strain | -18±0.7 | -18±1.1 | -18±1.5 | -17±0.9 | 0.78 |
| Tricuspid E (cm/s) | 53.5±18 | 61.1±20 | 56.4±13 | 56.3±15 | 0.18 |
| Tricuspid A (cm/s) | 38±9 | 40.4±10 | 38.4±8 | 35.4±9 | 0.93 |
| Tricuspid E’ (cm/s) | 14.6±3.4 | 12.6±2.6 | 13.8±3.3 | 15.0±3.4 | 0.06 |
Values presented as mean ± standard deviation. Tissue Mitral S: displacement velocity of the mitral annulus at systole (cm/s); FSVE; Mitral E: filling velocity in the mitral Doppler in the fast filling stage; Mitral A: filling velocity at mitral Doppler at atrial contraction; LAV = left atrium volume calculated by the Simpson method indexed to the body surface; LA: left atrium, RV = right ventricle; Tricuspid S = velocity of tricuspid ring displacement in the period of systole of RV; Tricuspid E and A = tricuspid Doppler filling velocity in the fast filling and atrial contraction phases, respectively; Tricuspid E’ = velocity of tricuspid ring displacement in the fast filling phase. Analysis performed using two-way ANOVA with P <0.05.