INTRODUCTION: It is unclear how immune perturbations may influence the pathogenesis of idiopathic gastroparesis, a prevalent functional disorder of the stomach which lacks animal models. Several studies have noted altered immune characteristics in the deep gastric muscle layer associated with gastroparesis, but data are lacking for the mucosal layer, which is endoscopically accessible. We hypothesized that immune dysregulation is present in the gastroduodenal mucosa in idiopathic gastroparesis and that specific immune profiles are associated with gastroparesis clinical parameters. METHODS: In this cross-sectional prospective case-control study, routine endoscopic biopsies were used for comprehensive immune profiling by flow cytometry, multicytokine array, and gene expression in 3 segments of the stomach and the duodenal bulb. Associations of immune endpoints with clinical parameters of gastroparesis were also explored. RESULTS: The gastric mucosa displayed large regional variation of distinct immune profiles. Furthermore, several-fold increases in innate and adaptive immune cells were found in gastroparesis. Various immune cell types showed positive correlations with duration of disease, proton pump inhibitor dosing, and delayed gastric emptying. DISCUSSION: This initial observational study showed immune compartmentalization of the human stomach mucosa and significant immune dysregulation at the level of leukocyte infiltration in idiopathic gastroparesis patients that extends to the duodenum. Select immune cells, such as macrophages, may correlate with clinicopathological traits of gastroparesis. This work supports further mucosal studies to advance our understanding of gastroparesis pathophysiology.
INTRODUCTION: It is unclear how immune perturbations may influence the pathogenesis of idiopathic gastroparesis, a prevalent functional disorder of the stomach which lacks animal models. Several studies have noted altered immune characteristics in the deep gastric muscle layer associated with gastroparesis, but data are lacking for the mucosal layer, which is endoscopically accessible. We hypothesized that immune dysregulation is present in the gastroduodenal mucosa in idiopathic gastroparesis and that specific immune profiles are associated with gastroparesis clinical parameters. METHODS: In this cross-sectional prospective case-control study, routine endoscopic biopsies were used for comprehensive immune profiling by flow cytometry, multicytokine array, and gene expression in 3 segments of the stomach and the duodenal bulb. Associations of immune endpoints with clinical parameters of gastroparesis were also explored. RESULTS: The gastric mucosa displayed large regional variation of distinct immune profiles. Furthermore, several-fold increases in innate and adaptive immune cells were found in gastroparesis. Various immune cell types showed positive correlations with duration of disease, proton pump inhibitor dosing, and delayed gastric emptying. DISCUSSION: This initial observational study showed immune compartmentalization of the human stomach mucosa and significant immune dysregulation at the level of leukocyte infiltration in idiopathic gastroparesis patients that extends to the duodenum. Select immune cells, such as macrophages, may correlate with clinicopathological traits of gastroparesis. This work supports further mucosal studies to advance our understanding of gastroparesis pathophysiology.
Gastroparesis is a functional motility disorder of gut-brain interaction associated
with delayed gastric emptying in the absence of a gastric outlet obstruction and
characterized by recurrent nausea, vomiting, abdominal pain, fullness, bloating, and
early satiety. The most common etiology is idiopathic, followed by diabetes,
postsurgical or postinfectious. Although it is considered a neuromuscular disorder
of the stomach (1), questions remain about the
causes, extent of organ involvement, and pathophysiology of idiopathic
gastroparesis.Immune dysregulation has been implicated in gastroparesis pathophysiology by direct
or indirect association to abnormal function of the enteric nervous system (ENS)
(2,3), pacemaker cells (4,5), or smooth muscle (6). In particular, studies have focused on the stomach
muscularis propria, reporting various abnormalities such as increased oxidative
stress with inflammatory cytokine burden (7);
loss of c-Kit staining in interstitial cells of Cajal (ICC) that correlates with
loss of anti-inflammatory muscularis macrophages (8,9); increased leukocyte
infiltration in the myenteric plexus (5,10); increased cytokines (5,11); and broad changes
in immune gene expression (12,13). However, the impact of immune
dysregulation on gastroparesis symptoms and gastric emptying remains to be
explained, and data are lacking for immune perturbations in the gastric mucosa.The mucosal immune system, in direct contact with the gut lumen, can regulate every
aspect of gastrointestinal function through its impact on epithelial barrier
function, enteric nervous system modulation, blood flow, nociceptor thresholds,
smooth muscle contractility, and gut-brain communication (rev. (14,15)).
In fact, mucosal inflammation is implicated in visceral hypersensitivity and the
generation of symptoms in irritable bowel syndrome and functional dyspepsia, the 2
most common disorders of gut-brain interaction (14,16–19). These studies have detailed increased
numbers of mucosal inflammatory cells such as mast cells (17,20,21), eosinophils (21–24), and
lymphocytes (21,25), as well as differentially expressed immune genes (26,27).
It is unclear, however, whether mucosal immune dysregulation occurs and/or
contributes to clinical symptoms and dysmotility in gastroparesis. We hypothesized
that immune dysregulation is present in the gastric mucosa in idiopathic
gastroparesis and that specific immune profiles are associated with gastroparesis
clinical parameters. To address this hypothesis, upper endoscopy mucosal biopsies
were used for gene expression, cytokine array, and flow cytometry immune
profiling.
METHODS
Study cohort and sample collection
Adult subjects (age 18–65 years) seen at the Stanford Digestive Health
Center with a diagnosis of idiopathic gastroparesis based on established
guidelines (28) and previous gastric
scintigraphy showing delayed emptying at 2 hours and/or 4 hours (29). Since there is significant overlap
between idiopathic gastroparesis and functional dyspepsia (30), Rome IV criteria (31) were used to assess for functional dyspepsia. For purposes of
this study, patients who met Rome IV criteria for functional dyspepsia and had
normal gastric scintigraphy were categorized as functional dyspepsia, and those
with delayed gastric emptying were characterized as idiopathic gastroparesis.
Conversely, all gastroparesis subjects met Rome IV criteria for postprandial
distress syndrome, and 73% (11/15) met criteria for epigastric pain syndrome, an
overlap that has been reported before (32). Control subjects were patients with none of the cardinal symptoms
of gastroparesis or dyspepsia, who presented for routine
esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) for conditions including Barrett's
esophagus surveillance, iron deficiency, gastroesophageal reflux follow-up,
prebariatric surgery evaluation, esophageal stricture, and heartburn. Subjects
were excluded if they had diabetes, active Helicobacter pylori,
active peptic ulcer disease, concomitant inflammatory/autoimmune disorder,
active nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug use, or if they had a history of
gastric surgery or gastric electric stimulator placement. Demographics and
clinical information can be found in Table 1. Routine cold-forceps biopsies were randomly taken by trained
endoscopists from the duodenal bulb, antrum, body, and fundus (see Figure 1A,
Supplementary Digital Content 1, http://links.lww.com/CTG/A601). In some cases, biopsy data were
not available for all the analyses; n for each experiment has been indicated in
all figure legends. Gastroparesis symptoms were assessed using the gastroparesis
cardinal symptom index daily diary (GCSI-dd) (33). Control subjects were queried for abdominal pain on a
0–5 scale in the 2–4 weeks preceding their endoscopy. All tissue
collections, processing, and data collection were conducted between June 2017
and October 2019 at Stanford University.
Table 1.
Subject demographics
Control
Idiopathic gastroparesis
Functional dyspepsia
n
10 (range)
15 (range)
5 (range)
Median age
57 (26–70)
34 (22–59)
P = 0.011[a]
43 (28–53)
ns[a]
Female
53%
80%
ns[b]
80%
ns[b]
White race
73%
80%
ns[b]
60%
ns[b]
BMI
27.8 (19–49)
22.3 (18–30)
ns[a]
22.6 (21–29)
ns[a]
A1C
5.1 (5.0–5.9)
5.3 (4.7–5.5)
ns[a]
5.0 (5.0–5.3)
ns[a]
On acid suppression therapy
42%
60%
ns[b]
20%
ns[a]
Endoscopic gastritis[c]
0.2 (0–1)
0.2 (0–1)
ns[a]
0.4 (0–1)
ns[a]
Abd pain[d]
0.4 (0–1)
3.5 (0.1–4.2)
P < 0.0001[a]
1.4 (0.8–2.5)
P = 0.018[a]
Median 2-hr, 4-hr retention[e]
—
53% (92–23)
47% (69–2)
—
29% (61–9)
4% (9–2)
GEBT T1/2 (min)
—
156 (205–59)
92 (103–54)
A1C, hemoglobin A1C; Abd, abdominal; BMI, body mass index; GEBT,
gastric emptying breath test.
False discovery rate–adjusted P value for
multiple comparisons after paired 1-way ANOVA.
Relative gastritis scale based on endoscopy and pathology findings:
0—normal; 1—erythema/gastropathy/mild gastritis; and
2—erosions/ulcers/active gastritis.
Abd pain: scale as in gastroparesis cardinal symptom index daily
diary from 0 to 5.
Subject demographicsA1C, hemoglobin A1C; Abd, abdominal; BMI, body mass index; GEBT,
gastric emptying breath test.False discovery rate–adjusted P value for
multiple comparisons after paired 1-way ANOVA.χ2 test vs control group.2- to 4-hour solid meal gastric scintigraphy; gastric emptying breath
test.Relative gastritis scale based on endoscopy and pathology findings:
0—normal; 1—erythema/gastropathy/mild gastritis; and
2—erosions/ulcers/active gastritis.Abd pain: scale as in gastroparesis cardinal symptom index daily
diary from 0 to 5.
NanoString gene expression array
RNA was obtained from flash-frozen (−80 °C) EGD samples stored in
RNAlater (Sigma) using the RNAmini with on-column DNA digestion (Qiagen)
following manufacturer's instructions. RNA (250 ng, RIN >7.0) was
submitted to NanoString for determination of transcript counts. Gene expression
scores were obtained from a predefined subset of 288 immune-associated genes
(see Table 1, Supplementary Digital Content 2, http://links.lww.com/CTG/A602) from the NanoString “Human
Neuropathology” gene expression panel (Neuroinflammation panel was not
available at the time of this study). Data were analyzed using nSolver software
following manufacturer instructions.
Luminex cytokine array
Plasma was obtained after a 10-minute centrifugation (800g) of
fasting venous blood in heparin-sulfate collection tubes. For tissue protein
extracts, flash-frozen endoscopy biopsy samples stored at −80 °C
were thawed in NP-40 lysis buffer (Invitrogen) supplemented with protease and
phosphatase inhibitors (cOmplete-Mini, Roche; Halt, Thermo), homogenized on ice
(Tissue Master 125, Omni), centrifuged at 1000g, and
supernatants aliquoted and frozen until further use. Bicinchoninic acid (BCA)
protein quantification was performed (Thermo). Cytokine measurements in plasma
and tissue protein extracts were obtained using the Human 62-multiplex array on
the Luminex 200 IS system (Affymetrix) performed at the Stanford Human Immune
Monitoring Core as previously described (34). Briefly, equal protein concentration of samples was tested in
duplicate wells, and matched sets of cases and controls were always mixed in all
plates to reduce confounding case status with plate artifacts. Few samples
suffered from selective cytokine bead aggregation, leading to exclusion of these
cytokine/sample pairs from the analysis. Median fluorescence intensity data were
preprocessed for each cytokine through a sequence of averaging over duplicate
wells, natural-logarithm transformation to reduce variance heterogeneity, and
isolation and removal of plate effects as previously reported (34).
Histological analyses
For this analysis, 2 gastroparesis samples and 4 controls with available tissue
for histology were complemented with retrospectively collected and stored
hematoxylin and eosin (H&E)-stained slides from 7 idiopathic gastroparesis
subjects and 4 controls for analysis. For total leukocyte estimation, 4 high
power fields (HPFs) (0.25 mm2) were counted in a blinded fashion on
H&E slides by a trained gastrointestinal pathologist and plotted as cells
per HPF or cells/mm2 (1 HPF = 0.25 mm2).
Immunohistochemistry was performed with antibodies to CD117+
(Ventana, clone 9.7) using a standard autostainer according to manufacturer
instructions (Ventana BenchMark ULTRA).
Multicolor flow cytometry
Cell suspensions were obtained from fresh, weighed, upper endoscopy biopsy
samples by type IV collagenase digestion and divided into 2 equal volumes for
control and stimulation (Lipopolysaccharide (LPS) 1 μg/mL + phorbol
myristate acetate (PMA) 50 ng/mL + ionomycin 1 μg/mL) before surface
staining and subsequent intracellular cytokine staining as previously described
(35). Fluorescence-conjugated
antibodies are in Supplemental Table 2, Supplementary Digital Content 2,
http://links.lww.com/CTG/A602. Nonviable cells were excluded
using Zombie Aqua Fixable Viability Kit (BioLegend, San Diego, CA). Data were
acquired on an LSRII or Fortessa cytometer (BD Biosciences) and analyzed with
FlowJo software (Becton, Dickinson, and Company, Ashland, OR). Gating of
putative major leukocyte populations (see Table 3, Supplementary Digital Content
2, http://links.lww.com/CTG/A602) is provided in Supplemental
Figure 1B–C, Supplementary Digital Content 1, http://links.lww.com/CTG/A601. Total immune cell counts were log
10 transformed to reduce variance heterogeneity and normalized to total live
cells to generate a measure of cell infiltration.
Statistics
Data were analyzed using Prism 7.0 software (GraphPad, San Diego, CA). Flow
cytometry, cytokine, and gene expression data were analyzed by 2-way ANOVA
(diagnosis and anatomical location) and corrected for multiple comparisons (cell
subsets, cytokines, etc.) by controlling the false discovery rate (FDR) by
Benjamini, Krieger, and Yekutieli procedure, and adjusted P
< 0.05 was considered significant. Pearson correlations and linear
regressions (2-tailed) were performed to assess the relationship of immune
endpoints to gastroparesis clinical characteristics. Spearman correlations were
performed if data did not pass the D'Agostino and Pearson normality test. A
2-stage linear step-up procedure of Benjamini, Krieger, and Yekutieli with Q
= 5% was used to estimate the number of true null hypotheses for the
various Pearson correlations analyzed (n = 32). A threshold of
P < 0.0015 was considered significant in the gastric
emptying comparison and P < 0.0013 for the GCSI-dd symptom
comparison.
Study approval
This observational study was conducted according to the Declaration of Helsinki,
in accordance with good clinical practice guidelines, and approved by
Stanford's Institutional Review Board (41569). Written informed consent was
received from participants before inclusion in the study. Patients or the public
were involved in the dissemination and enrollment of our study, but they were
not involved in the design, conduct, or reporting of our research.
RESULTS
Description of study cohort
The idiopathic gastroparesis cohort in this study comprised subjects involved in
our previous study with vagal nerve stimulation (36) at their baseline before any intervention. Briefly, they were
mostly white women (80%) with normal body mass index (BMI) and A1C (Table 1). All had delayed gastric emptying on
scintigraphy (median retention at 4 hours, 29%, range 61%–9%), and 60%
were on acid suppression therapy. The control group was older (median age 57 vs
34 years), 53% female, and slightly overweight (median BMI 28 vs 22), but
otherwise had similar demographic and baseline characteristics. The small cohort
of functional dyspepsia patients was well matched in age, race, BMI, and
symptoms to the gastroparesis cohort, although had normal gastric emptying on
scintigraphy (median retention at 4 hours 4%, range 9%–2%).
Immune profiling in nongastroparesis controls reveals a distinct gastric
mucosal gradient
The human gastric mucosa is compartmentalized into distinct functional regions,
i.e., acid vs mucus production, etc.; however, little is known about its immune
composition. We first compared the mucosal immune compartment in control
subjects across the major anatomical segments of the stomach and duodenal bulb
using a combination of gene expression, cytokine array, and flow cytometry (see
Figure 1A, Supplementary Digital Content 1, http://links.lww.com/CTG/A601). Immune-associated transcripts
from a NanoString expression panel distinguished the proximal stomach (fundus
+ body) from the antrum and duodenum by unsupervised hierarchical
clustering and principal component analysis (Figure 1a). The major pathways differentiating the proximal stomach
from the antrum/duodenum included adaptive immune response, neutrophil
degranulation, antimicrobial peptides, infectious disease, signaling by vascular
endothelial growth factor (high in the duodenum and antrum), and extracellular
matrix organization, endothelial nitric oxide synthase activation, unfolded
protein response, and signaling by transforming growth factor (TGF)-β
(high in the proximal stomach) (Figure 1b).
Cytokine Luminex array in control subjects showed higher duodenal cytokine
protein levels (C-X-C motif ligand (CXCL) 1, interleukin (IL)-12p40, IL-2,
IL-17α, platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF)-β, and brain-derived
neurotrophic factor) (Figure 1c), which was
consistent with higher levels of CD4+ T cells in this location
by flow cytometry (Figure 1d). Select
cytokines were more abundant in the proximal stomach (IL-31, TGFα, leptin,
and chemokine ligand (CCL)-3) or showed an increased trend (FAS-ligand, IL-6,
and IL-17 F) (Figure 1c). Flow cytometry
showed that the gastric fundus and body had comparable total leukocyte densities
to the duodenum and the highest density of CD8+ T cells and
macrophages (Figure 1d). There was overall
good concordance of cell densities between the various gastric compartments and
duodenal bulb (Figure 1e), except for
CD206+ macrophages in the fundus and the antrum/duodenum. In
summary, the human proximal and distal stomach are quite distinct in their
immune composition.
Figure 1.
Immune profiling reveals a distinct gastric mucosal gradient.
(a) (Top) Unsupervised hierarchical clustering by
NanoString gene expression of 288 immune-related genes from each
anatomical site (n = 7 for fundus; n = 10 for the body,
antrum, and duodenum [Duod]). (Bottom) Principal component (PC) analysis
for anatomy, showing distinct segregation of gastric compartments and
duodenum. (b) Hierarchical clustering analysis of
NanoString immune-related pathways generated by nSolver analysis
software. (c) Heatmap showing median mucosal tissue
cytokine levels in controls (n = 10 per group) for representative
differentially abundant cytokines. * = P
< 0.05, ** = P < 0.01, and
**** = P < 0.0001
(FDR-adjusted P values for multiple comparisons after
2-way ANOVA). (d) Heatmap showing median mucosal total
immune cells by flow cytometry normalized to total live cells, with SD
below in italics (n = 7) in each site. (e) Concordance
of leukocyte populations across the various biopsy sites. * =
P < 0.05, ** =
P < 0.01, and *** =
P < 0.001 (2-tailed P value
by Pearson correlation). F, fundus; FDR, false discovery rate; B, body;
A, antrum; D, duodenum.
Immune profiling reveals a distinct gastric mucosal gradient.
(a) (Top) Unsupervised hierarchical clustering by
NanoString gene expression of 288 immune-related genes from each
anatomical site (n = 7 for fundus; n = 10 for the body,
antrum, and duodenum [Duod]). (Bottom) Principal component (PC) analysis
for anatomy, showing distinct segregation of gastric compartments and
duodenum. (b) Hierarchical clustering analysis of
NanoString immune-related pathways generated by nSolver analysis
software. (c) Heatmap showing median mucosal tissue
cytokine levels in controls (n = 10 per group) for representative
differentially abundant cytokines. * = P
< 0.05, ** = P < 0.01, and
**** = P < 0.0001
(FDR-adjusted P values for multiple comparisons after
2-way ANOVA). (d) Heatmap showing median mucosal total
immune cells by flow cytometry normalized to total live cells, with SD
below in italics (n = 7) in each site. (e) Concordance
of leukocyte populations across the various biopsy sites. * =
P < 0.05, ** =
P < 0.01, and *** =
P < 0.001 (2-tailed P value
by Pearson correlation). F, fundus; FDR, false discovery rate; B, body;
A, antrum; D, duodenum.
Gastroparesis is characterized by dysregulated mucosal immune
profiles
When compared at the gene expression level by NanoString, gastroparesis subjects
maintained the same anatomical relationships as controls (Figure 2a) and had a small, but significant increase
in duodenal global immune gene expression (Figure 2b). However, no individual genes reached statistical significance
after controlling for multiple comparisons (data not shown). Luminex cytokine
array of whole tissue lysates showed modest (1.3–1.1 fold), but
significant, increases in select cytokines in the antrum (CXCL1, IL17F,
resistin, and IL18) (Figure 2c). IL-31, a
Th2 cytokine, was significantly reduced in the fundus (Figure 2c). These results showing increased
cytokines in the antrum were supported by retrospective histologic analysis of a
small subset of biopsies showing increased leukocytes and mast cells in the
antrum, broadly distributed along the glands and pits of the lamina propria
(Figure 2d–f).
Figure 2.
Targeted immune profiling reveals increased immune activity in idiopathic
gastroparesis. (a) Principal component (PC) analysis for
controls and gastroparesis from NanoString gene expression of 288
immune-related genes. (b) Calculated immune Z-scores based
on global immune gene expression for each site, n = 7 for F; n
= 10 for B, A, D. * = P < 0.05
(Bonferroni post hoc–adjusted P values for
multiple comparisons after 2-way ANOVA). (c) Heatmap
showing median fold change in tissue cytokine levels (log2 Median
fluorescence intensity) (n = 10 controls and n = 6–15
in the gastroparesis group). * = P <
0.05 (FDR-adjusted P values for multiple comparisons
after 2-way ANOVA). (d) (Left) Representative gastric
biopsy on H&E staining to denote tissue depth (bar = 200
μm) spanning mostly mucosa and a small amount of muscularis
mucosae and submucosa. (Right) H&E representative gastric biopsy
(antrum) with arrows pointing to lamina propria glands and pits (bar
= 50 μm; n = 8–7 per group). (e)
Leukocyte counts per 4 high power fields (HPF = 0.25
mm2) from biopsies of gastroparesis subjects and controls (n
= 2 and 9 in the body and antrum, respectively). FDR-adjusted
P values for multiple comparisons after 2-way
ANOVA. (f) (Left) CD117 immunoperoxidase representative
staining and (right) cell counts by HPF in the antrum (bar = 15
μm; n = 7 per group). The unpaired Student t
test. A, antrum/Antr; B, body; D, duodenum/Duod; F, fundus/fund; FDR,
false discovery rate; H&E, hematoxylin and eosin.
Targeted immune profiling reveals increased immune activity in idiopathic
gastroparesis. (a) Principal component (PC) analysis for
controls and gastroparesis from NanoString gene expression of 288
immune-related genes. (b) Calculated immune Z-scores based
on global immune gene expression for each site, n = 7 for F; n
= 10 for B, A, D. * = P < 0.05
(Bonferroni post hoc–adjusted P values for
multiple comparisons after 2-way ANOVA). (c) Heatmap
showing median fold change in tissue cytokine levels (log2 Median
fluorescence intensity) (n = 10 controls and n = 6–15
in the gastroparesis group). * = P <
0.05 (FDR-adjusted P values for multiple comparisons
after 2-way ANOVA). (d) (Left) Representative gastric
biopsy on H&E staining to denote tissue depth (bar = 200
μm) spanning mostly mucosa and a small amount of muscularis
mucosae and submucosa. (Right) H&E representative gastric biopsy
(antrum) with arrows pointing to lamina propria glands and pits (bar
= 50 μm; n = 8–7 per group). (e)
Leukocyte counts per 4 high power fields (HPF = 0.25
mm2) from biopsies of gastroparesis subjects and controls (n
= 2 and 9 in the body and antrum, respectively). FDR-adjusted
P values for multiple comparisons after 2-way
ANOVA. (f) (Left) CD117 immunoperoxidase representative
staining and (right) cell counts by HPF in the antrum (bar = 15
μm; n = 7 per group). The unpaired Student t
test. A, antrum/Antr; B, body; D, duodenum/Duod; F, fundus/fund; FDR,
false discovery rate; H&E, hematoxylin and eosin.Given that CD45+ leukocytes only comprised a small fraction of
total biopsy cells (3%–17%), biopsy bulk RNA/cytokine analysis may not be
sensitive enough to detect immune cell-specific changes. To circumvent this, we
leveraged our expertise in multicolor flow cytometry for single cell analysis. A
smaller cohort of functional dyspepsia patients was included as an additional
control of patients with gastroparesis-like symptoms, but normal gastric
emptying (Table 1). Gastroparesis was
associated with significantly increased mucosal CD45+ leukocytes
in all 3 major compartments of the stomach, with a similar trend in the duodenal
bulb (Figure 3). All cell types examined
were elevated except CD8+ T cells and B cells (Figure 3). Increased immune gastric infiltrates were
specific to idiopathic gastroparesis and not observed in the small functional
dyspepsia group (Figure 3). These results
show a significant and broad infiltration of innate and adaptive immune cells in
the gastric mucosa occurring in gastroparesis, with the largest fold change
occurring in the antrum.
Figure 3.
Flow cytometry shows distinct mucosal inflammation in idiopathic
gastroparesis. Flow cytometry cell counts and total viable singlets were
Log10 converted and then ratio taken between them. n = 7 controls,
13 GP, 5 FD. * = P < 0.05, **
= P < 0.01, *** =
P < 0.001 (false discovery
rate–adjusted P values for multiple comparisons
after 2-way ANOVA). Duod, duodenum, GP, gastroparesis.
Flow cytometry shows distinct mucosal inflammation in idiopathic
gastroparesis. Flow cytometry cell counts and total viable singlets were
Log10 converted and then ratio taken between them. n = 7 controls,
13 GP, 5 FD. * = P < 0.05, **
= P < 0.01, *** =
P < 0.001 (false discovery
rate–adjusted P values for multiple comparisons
after 2-way ANOVA). Duod, duodenum, GP, gastroparesis.Myeloid cells and B cells were stained with IL1α, TNFα, and
TGFβ and lymphocytes with TNFα, IFNγ, IL-5, and IL-17 to
assess inflammatory vs anti-inflammatory phenotypes. No change was seen for
frequency of TGFβ+ or TNFα+ cells
(see Figure 2A–B, Supplementary Digital Content 1, http://links.lww.com/CTG/A601), but there was a trend toward
increased IL1α staining in CD206+ macrophages (see Figure
2C, Supplementary Digital Content 1, http://links.lww.com/CTG/A601). Frequencies of major subsets of
CD4+ and CD8+ T cells and regulatory
CD4+ T cells (see Figure 2D–E, Supplementary Digital
Content 1, http://links.lww.com/CTG/A601) were similar between controls and
gastroparesis. Given that total cell infiltration was greater for most leukocyte
subsets (Figure 3), the number of
cytokine+ cells was higher in gastroparesis samples (not
shown).Finally, the impact of clinical parameters on leukocyte infiltration was
analyzed. Total leukocytes and mast cells in the gastric antrum were positively
correlated with duration of disease (Figure 4a). Other cell types did not show this correlation (not shown).
Although there was no difference in acid suppression therapy use between groups
(Table 1), the gastroparesis cohort
showed a significant correlation between proton pump inhibitor (PPI) dosing and
gastric, but not duodenal, myeloid cell infiltrates (Figure 4b). This was not the case for lymphocyte populations
studied (not shown). Of note, no PPI correlations were found in the control
group (Figure 4b). During endoscopy, some
gastroparesis subjects had bile/food stasis noted, and/or erythema, and/or
reported antral gastropathy or chronic gastritis on biopsy pathology report.
None of these endoscopic findings (pooled) was associated with higher leukocyte
or lymphocyte counts (Figure 4c). Finally,
although the control group was significantly older (Table 1), age did not correlate with leukocyte numbers in controls
or gastroparesis (Figure 4d). That disease
duration and PPI dosing correlate with leukocyte infiltration in the stomach is
intriguing and requires further studies to assess causality.
Figure 4.
Antral mucosal leukocytes correlate with duration of disease and PPI use,
but not by age or endoscopic findings. (a) Linear
regressions and Spearman correlations between CD45+
(left) and mast (right) cells in each compartment and years since
diagnosis in gastroparesis subjects. (b) Linear regression
and Pearson correlations between various myeloid antral cells and PPI
dosing in controls and GP (2-tailed P value).
(c) Major immune cell types per anatomic location in
gastroparesis cohort grouped by endoscopic findings (as described in
text). (d) Table (top) and representative graphs (bottom)
of linear regressions and Pearson correlations between
CD45+ leukocytes and age in controls and GP. n
= 7 controls, 13 GP. Duod, duodenum; GP, gastroparesis; ns,
nonsignificant; PPI, protein pump inhibitor.
Antral mucosal leukocytes correlate with duration of disease and PPI use,
but not by age or endoscopic findings. (a) Linear
regressions and Spearman correlations between CD45+
(left) and mast (right) cells in each compartment and years since
diagnosis in gastroparesis subjects. (b) Linear regression
and Pearson correlations between various myeloid antral cells and PPI
dosing in controls and GP (2-tailed P value).
(c) Major immune cell types per anatomic location in
gastroparesis cohort grouped by endoscopic findings (as described in
text). (d) Table (top) and representative graphs (bottom)
of linear regressions and Pearson correlations between
CD45+ leukocytes and age in controls and GP. n
= 7 controls, 13 GP. Duod, duodenum; GP, gastroparesis; ns,
nonsignificant; PPI, protein pump inhibitor.
Gastric macrophages and CD8+ T cells may correlate with
gastric emptying delay, but not with gastroparesis symptoms
From among the various immune cells studied,
CD45+CD68+ macrophages, CD8+
T cells, and B cells showed associations with gastric emptying when using
percentage retention at 4 hours (Figure 5a,b), and a similar trend when using emptying half time
(T1/2 minutes, not shown). Gastric macrophages and
CD8+ T cells, specifically IFNγ+
CD8+ T cells, were positively correlated with gastric
emptying delay, while duodenal B cells were inversely correlated. Cytokine
positive macrophages (IL1α, TGFβ, or TNFα) did not show any
correlations with gastric emptying (data not shown). Of note, only duodenal B
cells (Figure 5) passed FDR criteria for
significance after adjusting for multiple comparisons.
Figure 5.
Gastric delay positively correlates with stomach, but not duodenal,
immune cells nor with gastroparesis cardinal symptoms. (a)
Heatmap showing Pearson correlation coefficients between distinct immune
cells types (rows) and gastric delay by 4 hour % retention in gastric
emptying scintigraphy (GES), grouped by anatomic location (columns). n
= 10 per site. (b) Representative linear regressions
for cell types (left axis) or % of IFNγ+ cells (right axis)
with significant Pearson correlations * = P
< 0.05, ** = P < 0.01
(2-tailed P value). n = 10 per site.
(c) Heatmap showing Pearson correlation coefficients
between distinct immune cells types (rows) and gastroparesis cardinal
symptom index daily diary (GCSI-dd) scores (aggregate, left) and
subscores (middle/right), grouped by anatomic location (columns). n
= 11 per site. * = P < 0.05
(2-tailed P value). A, antrum; B, body; D,
duodenum/Duod; F, fundus.
Gastric delay positively correlates with stomach, but not duodenal,
immune cells nor with gastroparesis cardinal symptoms. (a)
Heatmap showing Pearson correlation coefficients between distinct immune
cells types (rows) and gastric delay by 4 hour % retention in gastric
emptying scintigraphy (GES), grouped by anatomic location (columns). n
= 10 per site. (b) Representative linear regressions
for cell types (left axis) or % of IFNγ+ cells (right axis)
with significant Pearson correlations * = P
< 0.05, ** = P < 0.01
(2-tailed P value). n = 10 per site.
(c) Heatmap showing Pearson correlation coefficients
between distinct immune cells types (rows) and gastroparesis cardinal
symptom index daily diary (GCSI-dd) scores (aggregate, left) and
subscores (middle/right), grouped by anatomic location (columns). n
= 11 per site. * = P < 0.05
(2-tailed P value). A, antrum; B, body; D,
duodenum/Duod; F, fundus.The aggregate GCSI-dd measures a composite of abdominal fullness, satiety,
nausea, vomiting, bloating, and pain. Of the immune cells measured, only
CD3+ gastric lymphocytes and CD8+ T cells
showed a moderate negative correlation with the GCSI-dd fullness/satiety
subscale (not passing FDR) with similar trends in the other symptom subscales
(Figure 5c). When the 5 functional
dyspepsia subjects with GCSI-dd scoring were added to the analysis, no
significant correlations were found between GCSI-dd scores and leukocyte
infiltration (not shown). These results suggest that mucosal immune cell
infiltration per se does not correlate with symptom severity in gastroparesis,
as has been reported for myenteric plexus CD45+ cell counts
(5).
Idiopathic gastroparesis is not associated with markers of systemic
inflammation, but with select increased plasma cytokines
To exclude systemic inflammation as a potential contributor of mucosal
inflammation in our gastroparesis cohort, common blood inflammatory markers were
evaluated. Complete blood counts and differential, C-reactive protein,
erythrocyte sedimentation rate, and liver function tests were all within normal
range in our gastroparesis cohort (see Figure 3, Supplementary Digital Content
1, http://links.lww.com/CTG/A601). The sole exception being one
subject with a transaminitis (see Figure 3F, Supplementary Digital Content 1,
http://links.lww.com/CTG/A601) secondary to ongoing alcohol
abuse, who was excluded from our flow cytometry, cytokine, and NanoString immune
analyses. Although within the normal range, it was of interest to note that
erythrocyte sedimentation rate and C-reactive protein were moderately correlated
with gastric CD4+ T cells expressing TNF (see Figure 3C,
Supplementary Digital Content 1, http://links.lww.com/CTG/A601).When analyzing plasma cytokine levels in the same gastroparesis cohort compared
with nongastroparesis controls, significant upregulation of 10 plasma cytokines
was noted (resistin, IL2, EGF, IL-5, CCL2, IL7, IL1RA, PDGFβ, TGFβ,
and LIF) (Figure 6a). Several of these
cytokines and chemokines showed a positive correlation with gastric emptying
delay (Figure 6b), but did not meet FDR
criteria (P < 0.0007). Cytokines did not correlate with
gastroparesis symptoms (not shown).
Figure 6.
Specific circulating cytokines are increased in idiopathic gastroparesis,
and associated with gastric delay. (a) Bar plot showing %
change from median control levels of plasma cytokines by Luminex. Insert
heatmap (right) showing fold change levels for significantly increased
cytokines. n = 15 per group. * = P
< 0.05, ** = P < 0.01
(FDR-adjusted P values for multiple comparisons after
2-way ANOVA). (b) Heatmap (left) and linear regressions
(right) showing Pearson correlation coefficients between distinct plasma
cytokines (rows) and gastric delay half time (T1/2) by the
gastric emptying breath test (GEBT). n = 15. * =
P < 0.05, ** =
P < 0.01 (2-tailed P value).
FDR, false discovery rate.
Specific circulating cytokines are increased in idiopathic gastroparesis,
and associated with gastric delay. (a) Bar plot showing %
change from median control levels of plasma cytokines by Luminex. Insert
heatmap (right) showing fold change levels for significantly increased
cytokines. n = 15 per group. * = P
< 0.05, ** = P < 0.01
(FDR-adjusted P values for multiple comparisons after
2-way ANOVA). (b) Heatmap (left) and linear regressions
(right) showing Pearson correlation coefficients between distinct plasma
cytokines (rows) and gastric delay half time (T1/2) by the
gastric emptying breath test (GEBT). n = 15. * =
P < 0.05, ** =
P < 0.01 (2-tailed P value).
FDR, false discovery rate.Altogether, these results show that our cohort of idiopathic gastroparesis does
not have elevated markers of systemic inflammation, despite having increased
mucosal immune infiltrates and small, yet significant, increases in plasma
cytokines. How these circulating cytokines may affect gastroparesis remains to
be studied.
DISCUSSION
This study suggests that idiopathic gastroparesis is associated with mucosal immune
dysregulation, predominantly reflected by increased leukocyte infiltration in the
lamina propria (graphical abstract). As with previous human gastroparesis studies
(11–13,37), there was not a
cohesive result when analyzing gene expression pathways or cytokine arrays. This
highlights the limitations of bulk RNA/proteomic analyses, which are unable to
detect changes in key minority gut cell populations such as immune cells. This
limitation was overcome by complementing this study with a detailed flow cytometry
analysis.Immune infiltration correlated with disease duration and PPI dosage, but was
independent of age or findings at the time of endoscopy. Chronic treatment with PPIs
has been reported to promote leukocyte infiltration through increased gastrin
signaling (38,39), but it is unclear why we only observed a positive association
between PPI dose and leukocyte infiltration in the gastroparesis cohort and not in
controls. Furthermore, all gastroparesis subjects had increased immune cell counts
compared with controls despite PPI use.Gastric stasis may be an additional factor because reduced immune infiltration
occurred in control and functional dyspepsia subjects with normal gastric emptying.
Also, the greatest increase of immune cell infiltration was observed in the distal
stomach, where enhanced antral stasis has been noted in gastroparesis (40). Furthermore, our results suggest gastric
delay may be correlated with both macrophage and CD8+ T-cell
infiltration. A major question remaining for future studies is whether mucosal
immune dysregulation is a passive consequence of delayed gastric emptying or an
active contributor to gastroparesis pathophysiology. These results suggest immune
changes in the gastric mucosa may reflect immune dysregulation in the deeper muscle
layers of gastroparesis subjects. Mouse models have demonstrated that
luminal/mucosal events such as microbiota changes and/or gastroenteritis impact gut
motility/peristalsis through a gut-brain-gut circuit that involves vagal sensory
neurons, sympathetic motor neurons, and adrenergic receptor signaling in muscularis
macrophages (41,42). Furthermore, in models of mucosal inflammation such as
TNBS-induced colitis, activation of lamina propria immune cells has been associated
with both loss of anti-inflammatory macrophage phenotypes (reviewed in reference
(43)) and muscularis macrophage
activation/infiltration of myenteric ganglia with impaired ICC-myenteric
contractility (44). Therefore, mucosal immune
activation can affect the function of deeper muscularis macrophages with consequent
dysmotility. These potential mechanisms need to be further validated prospectively
in animal models. Further studies are needed to explore whether gastric mucosal
immune dysregulation affects the gut-brain-gut motility axis and how it may play a
role in gastroparesis. Particularly as immune dysregulation in gastroparesis is
evident (11–13,37), but not yet
clear, with no cohesive model yet proposed in humans (1). Examples of future studies addressing these questions would include
evaluating the function of immune cells infiltrating the gastric mucosa, studying
the impact of inflammatory cytokines on stomach vagal and ENS signaling, and
assessment of how mucosal immune dysregulation modulates key cell types in the
myenteric layer regulating gastric motility.Abnormalities in muscularis macrophages have been reported in gastroparesis (9), and here, we report mucosal macrophages may
correlate positively with gastric delay. We further found that idiopathic
gastroparesis is associated with an increase in mucosal
CD206+macrophages. This is in contrast to the reported loss (9) or lack of change (8) in CD206 staining by histological analysis of muscularis
macrophages in gastroparesis or diabetic mouse models. In fact, our results show
that besides being increased in gastroparesis, mucosal CD206+
macrophages may have higher levels of IL-1α, suggesting they are more
reactive/inflammatory. This is in agreement with data reported recently by human
gastric muscularis tissue transcriptomic profiling (12) and proteomics analysis (37),
where transcripts associated with M1 macrophage phenotype were increased in
idiopathic gastroparesis, and a reduction in anti-inflammatory M2
phenotype-promoting proteins was associated with both diabetic and idiopathic
gastroparesis. The dichotomy between CD206 expression and inflammatory phenotype may
be due to the species, type, and location of macrophage in question. Generalization
of the phagocytic mannose receptor CD206 being associated with an anti-inflammatory
phenotype in macrophages is still debated (45). In mice, muscularis macrophages express high levels of CD206, but not
lamina propria macrophages (46), and this
indeed correlates with an anti-inflammatory phenotype. However, in humans, both
lamina propria macrophages and muscularis macrophages have high levels of CD206,
which are associated with muted responses to Toll-like receptor ligands (47). Extrapolating function between lamina
propria macrophages and muscularis macrophages is not appropriate because these 2
macrophage populations have very distinct transcriptional programs (46–48). Our results, however, support the notion of altered macrophage
function as a cardinal finding in gastroparesis.The relationship between gastroparesis symptoms and leukocyte infiltration is less
clear, and symptoms have not been found to correlate well with immune cell
infiltration (5). This study was not powered
to adequately address this question. Activated and/or increased lymphocytes, mast
cells and/or macrophages, acting through pain neuropeptides (i.e., substance P) and
neurotransmitters (i.e., serotonin), likely contribute to visceral hypersensitivity
as suggested in studies of functional dyspepsia, irritable bowel syndrome, and
inflammatory bowel disease (19,21,25).
Therefore, future studies on downstream inflammatory neuropeptides and
neurotransmitters known to modulate visceral sensation may be revealing.Our results contrast those by Salicru et al., who showed no difference between
controls and gastroparesis in prevalence of gastritis (6%–4%) in a large
retrospective review of gastric biopsy pathology reports (49). This discrepancy likely reflects differences in
quantification (flow cytometry vs retrospective histology reports) and gastritis
grading among pathologists. Gastric mucosa increases in leukocyte infiltration by
flow cytometry were specific to idiopathic gastroparesis and were not observed in
our small cohort of functional dyspepsia. Our preliminary findings with functional
dyspepsia are consistent with previous reports detailing no change in gastric or D1
mast cells and eosinophils (18,21,23,24,50). Although controls in this study were older (younger
asymptomatic adults rarely present for endoscopy), no correlation between leukocyte
infiltration and age was found, suggesting age was an unlikely confounder.The stomach mucosa, in both controls and gastroparesis subjects, was surprisingly
distinct in its immune composition, with relatively high leukocyte densities in the
proximal stomach compared with the antrum and distinct cytokine and immune gene
expression profiles. The implications are not yet clear, but may relate to the
proximal stomach functioning as a reservoir of undigested food where immune barrier
function should be robust. Other possibilities include differential gradients of
specialized gastric epithelial cells (51).
Further studies will be required to distinguish the functional specialization of
mucosal immune cells in the proximal vs distal stomach.To the best of our knowledge, this is the first comprehensive immune profiling of the
human gastric mucosa in idiopathic gastroparesis. This human exploratory
observational study was meant to be a hypothesis-generating investigation. This is
particularly relevant for idiopathic gastroparesis, which has no animal models for
mechanistic studies. Our study suggests that gastric mucosal immune profiling may
reveal novel mechanistic insights into the pathophysiology of gastroparesis. This is
significant given the limited access for research of gastric muscle tissue, which is
heavily biased toward severe medically refractory gastroparesis and/or morbidly
obese controls (13). Some limitations to this
study include relatively small sample size, inability to assess acute gastritis
assessed as neutrophil infiltrates, and exclusion of eosinophils given limited
staining options on the flow cytometry panel. As a cross-sectional observational
study, causation between immune profiles and gastroparesis clinical parameters
cannot be established either. Importantly, correlations between immune profiles and
clinical patient data need to be prospectively validated in appropriately powered
studies because they did not meet FDR criteria in multiple comparison analyses.In summary, the findings of this initial observational study suggest that mucosal
immune dysregulation occurs in idiopathic gastroparesis and may directly or
indirectly affect gastric motility. Care should be taken to standardize mucosal
biopsy research sampling, given the significant differences in immune composition
between the proximal and distal stomach. This study raises new interesting future
questions, including (i) the role of impaired barrier permeability and/or luminal
microbial composition in gastric mucosal inflammation, (ii) the basis for a marked
immune gradient in the stomach, (iii) the differential roles of distinct mucosal
immune cells and their secreted factors in gastroparesis, (iv) overlap of mucosal
immune dysregulation in idiopathic and diabetic gastroparesis, and (v) the
mechanisms tying mucosal immune dysregulation to visceral hypersensitivity and
gastric dysmotility. Immune profiling of mucosal biopsies opens the door to a novel
aspect of gastroparesis study and allows for further investigations to determine how
mucosal immune dysregulation contributes to altered sensation and motility.
CONFLICTS OF INTEREST
Guarantor of the article: Andres Gottfried-Blackmore, MD, PhD.Specific author contributions: A.G.-B.: study concept, design and
direction, sample collection protocol, data analyses and interpretation, manuscript
writing, and approved the final draft submitted; H.N.: sample collection protocol,
data analyses and interpretation, and approved the final draft submitted; B.M.:
histology data generation and analysis, manuscript revision, and approved the final
draft submitted; E.A.: sample collection protocol, subject enrollment and
demographics, sample collection, and approved the final draft submitted; J.G.: data
analysis and manuscript revision and approved the final draft submitted; N.F.-B.:
subject enrollment, manuscript revision, and approved the final draft submitted;
J.C.: subject enrollment, manuscript revision, and approved the final draft
submitted; J.I.: data analysis, manuscript editing, and approved the final draft
submitted; L.N.: study concept and design, subject enrollment, manuscript editing,
and approved the final draft submitted; A.H.: study concept and design, data
interpretation, edited manuscript, and approved the final draft submitted.Financial support: NIDDK 5T32DK007056-43, NIDDK R01DK101119, and
philanthropic gift from Colleen and Bob Haas.Potential competing interests: None to report.
WHAT IS KNOWN
✓ Although the mucosa and submucosa
have the greatest immune cell density, little is known about
the regional distribution of immunological traits in the
human gastric mucosa.✓ Data are lacking in gastroparesis
for immune characteristics of the gastric mucosal layer,
which is endoscopically accessible.✓ It is unclear how mucosal immune
perturbations may influence gastroparesis.
WHAT IS NEW HERE
✓ The gastric mucosa displays large
regional variation of distinct immune profiles.✓ Innate and adaptive immune cells
are increased in gastroparesis mucosal biopsies compared
with disease controls.✓ Gastric mucosal macrophages and
CD8+ T cells may positively correlate
with gastric emptying delay.
TRANSLATIONAL IMPACT
✓ Significant differences in immune
composition between the gastric mucosal regions has
implications in the interpretation of endoscopic biopsy
research sampling.✓ Mucosal immune profiling may help
to differentiate idiopathic gastroparesis from functional
dyspepsia.✓ Accessible mucosal biopsy
analyses may advance future studies addressing the
pathophysiology of gastroparesis and its treatment.
Authors: Madhusudan Grover; Surendra Dasari; Cheryl E Bernard; Lakshmikanth L Chikkamenahalli; Katherine P Yates; Pankaj J Pasricha; Irene Sarosiek; Richard McCallum; Kenneth L Koch; Thomas L Abell; Braden Kuo; Robert J Shulman; Simon J Gibbons; Travis J McKenzie; Todd A Kellogg; Michael L Kendrick; James Tonascia; Frank A Hamilton; Henry P Parkman; Gianrico Farrugia Journal: Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol Date: 2019-09-04 Impact factor: 4.052
Authors: Paul Andrew Muller; Balázs Koscsó; Gaurav Manohar Rajani; Korey Stevanovic; Marie-Luise Berres; Daigo Hashimoto; Arthur Mortha; Marylene Leboeuf; Xiu-Min Li; Daniel Mucida; E Richard Stanley; Stephanie Dahan; Kara Gross Margolis; Michael David Gershon; Miriam Merad; Milena Bogunovic Journal: Cell Date: 2014-08-28 Impact factor: 41.582
Authors: C E Bernard; S J Gibbons; I S Mann; L Froschauer; H P Parkman; S Harbison; T L Abell; W J Snape; W L Hasler; R W McCallum; I Sarosiek; L A B Nguyen; K L Koch; J Tonascia; F A Hamilton; M L Kendrick; K R Shen; P J Pasricha; G Farrugia Journal: Neurogastroenterol Motil Date: 2014-07-13 Impact factor: 3.598
Authors: Jose G Montoya; Tyson H Holmes; Jill N Anderson; Holden T Maecker; Yael Rosenberg-Hasson; Ian J Valencia; Lily Chu; Jarred W Younger; Cristina M Tato; Mark M Davis Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2017-07-31 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Gianluca Cipriani; Simon J Gibbons; Pieter-Jan Verhulst; Kyoung Moo Choi; Seth T Eisenman; Stephanie S Hein; Tamas Ordog; David R Linden; Joseph H Szurszewski; Gianrico Farrugia Journal: Cell Mol Gastroenterol Hepatol Date: 2016-01-01
Authors: Madhusudan Grover; Simon J Gibbons; Asha A Nair; Cheryl E Bernard; Adeel S Zubair; Seth T Eisenman; Laura A Wilson; Laura Miriel; Pankaj J Pasricha; Henry P Parkman; Irene Sarosiek; Richard W McCallum; Kenneth L Koch; Thomas L Abell; William J Snape; Braden Kuo; Robert J Shulman; Travis J McKenzie; Todd A Kellogg; Michael L Kendrick; James Tonascia; Frank A Hamilton; Gianrico Farrugia Journal: BMC Med Genomics Date: 2018-08-07 Impact factor: 3.063
Authors: Se Eun Ha; Brian G Jorgensen; Lai Wei; Byungchang Jin; Min-Seob Kim; Sandra M Poudrier; Rajan Singh; Allison Bartlett; Hannah Zogg; Sei Kim; Gain Baek; Masaaki Kurahashi; Moon-Young Lee; Yong-Sung Kim; Suck-Chei Choi; Kent C Sasse; Samuel J S Rubin; Andres Gottfried-Blackmore; Laren Becker; Aida Habtezion; Kenton M Sanders; Seungil Ro Journal: Int J Mol Sci Date: 2022-04-30 Impact factor: 6.208