Literature DB >> 33978983

Benralizumab improves symptoms of patients with severe, eosinophilic asthma with a diagnosis of nasal polyposis.

Giorgio Walter Canonica1,2, Tim W Harrison3, Pascal Chanez4, Francesco Menzella5, Renaud Louis6, Borja G Cosio7, Njira L Lugogo8, Arjun Mohan9, Annie Burden10, Esther Garcia Gil11.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Clinically meaningful improvement in the Sino-Nasal Outcome Test-22 (SNOT-22) was observed in patients with severe, eosinophilic asthma, and nasal polyposis (NP) treated with benralizumab in the ANDHI trial. A post hoc assessment of the effects of benralizumab on SNOT-22 response and asthma efficacy measures in these patients was conducted for further characterization of the efficacy and safety of benralizumab for patients with severe asthma and NP.
METHODS: Adults with severe, eosinophilic asthma who had experienced ≥2 prior-year exacerbations despite high-dosage inhaled corticosteroid plus additional controller[s] were randomized to 24 weeks of benralizumab or placebo. Patients with physician-diagnosed chronic rhinosinusitis with NP of any severity ongoing at baseline who consented to participate were included in the current ANDHI NP substudy population. Effect on NP symptoms was assessed by the SNOT-22, with an improvement of at least 8.9 defined as clinically significant (responder). Effects on chronic asthma outcomes were assessed by means of annualized asthma exacerbation rate (AER), St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) total score, forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1 ), and Asthma Control Questionnaire-6 (ACQ-6). All p-values were nominal.
RESULTS: Of the ANDHI population (n = 656), 23% (n = 153) participated in the NP substudy (n = 96 benralizumab; n = 57 placebo). Patients were 50% female, with mean age of 53 years, had prior-year AER = 3.3; mean pre-bronchodilator FEV1  = 55% predicted; and median blood eosinophil count ​= 510 cells/µl. For patients with high baseline SNOT-22 scores (>30), benralizumab treatment improved symptoms of NP as measured by SNOT-22 from baseline to Week 24 compared with placebo (Week 24: -10.44 [p = .0176]). Percentage of responders to SNOT-22 was greater for benralizumab vs. placebo (71.3% vs. 45.5%; p = .0036), and effect was enhanced for patients with high baseline SNOT-22 scores (>30). A 69% reduction vs. placebo in annualized AER (0.77 vs. 2.47; p < .0001) and greater clinically meaningful improvements from baseline in SGRQ total score (-16.7), FEV1 (+0.32 L), and ACQ-6 (-0.88) were observed (p < .0001). Benralizumab was well-tolerated. Frequency of adverse events (AEs) was similar for benralizumab (76.0%) and placebo (73.7%) groups. Most common AEs (frequency ≥5%) reported at a greater frequency in benralizumab vs. placebo included headache, sinusitis, pyrexia, and influenza.
CONCLUSIONS: These substudy data from ANDHI demonstrated the efficacy profile of benralizumab for patients with severe, eosinophilic asthma and NP, with improvement in SNOT-22 and asthma outcomes.
© 2021 EAACI and John Wiley and Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley and Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  asthma; asthma treatment; biologics; eosinophils; sinusitis

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33978983     DOI: 10.1111/all.14902

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Allergy        ISSN: 0105-4538            Impact factor:   13.146


  7 in total

1.  Reliability, Satisfaction and Effectiveness of Benralizumab Home Self-Administration in Patients with Severe Eosinophilic Asthma in Real-World Practice: The Auto-Benra Study.

Authors:  Ismael García-Moguel; Ana Rosado; Aída Gómez-Cardeñosa; Mar Gandolfo-Cano; Teresa Robledo Echarren; Maria Del Mar Moro Moro; Mª Del Mar Reaño Martos; Rafael Pineda-Pineda; Marcela Valverde-Monge; Cristina Martin-Arriscado Arroba; Javier Domínguez-Ortega
Journal:  J Asthma Allergy       Date:  2022-05-13

Review 2.  Personalized Management of Patients with Chronic Rhinosinusitis with Nasal Polyps in Clinical Practice: A Multidisciplinary Consensus Statement.

Authors:  Eugenio De Corso; Maria Beatrice Bilò; Andrea Matucci; Veronica Seccia; Fulvio Braido; Matteo Gelardi; Enrico Heffler; Manuela Latorre; Luca Malvezzi; Girolamo Pelaia; Gianenrico Senna; Paolo Castelnuovo; Giorgio Walter Canonica
Journal:  J Pers Med       Date:  2022-05-23

3.  Effect of benralizumab in a patient with uncontrolled severe eosinophilic asthma and comorbid chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps refractory to mepolizumab treatment.

Authors:  Adel H Mansur
Journal:  Respir Med Case Rep       Date:  2021-11-27

Review 4.  A pragmatic guide to choosing biologic therapies in severe asthma.

Authors:  Joanne E Kavanagh; Andrew P Hearn; David J Jackson
Journal:  Breathe (Sheff)       Date:  2021-12

Review 5.  Biological Therapy of Severe Asthma and Nasal Polyps.

Authors:  Agamemnon Bakakos; Florence Schleich; Petros Bakakos
Journal:  J Pers Med       Date:  2022-06-16

Review 6.  Management of Patients with Severe Asthma and Chronic Rhinosinusitis with Nasal Polyps: A Multidisciplinary Shared Approach.

Authors:  Veronica Seccia; Maria D'Amato; Giulia Scioscia; Diego Bagnasco; Fabiano Di Marco; Gianluca Fadda; Francesco Menzella; Ernesto Pasquini; Girolamo Pelaia; Eugenio Tremante; Eugenio De Corso; Matteo Bonini
Journal:  J Pers Med       Date:  2022-07-01

7.  The burden of chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps and its relation to asthma in Finland.

Authors:  Sanna Toppila-Salmi; Jenni Hällfors; Juhani Aakko; Bettina Mannerström; Kaisa Nieminen; Gunilla Telg; Lauri Lehtimäki
Journal:  Clin Transl Allergy       Date:  2022-10-09       Impact factor: 5.657

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.