Ann M Dennis1, Andrew Cressman1, Dana Pasquale2, Simon D W Frost3,4, Elizabeth Kelly1, Jalila Guy1, Victoria Mobley5, Erika Samoff5, Christopher B Hurt1, Candice Mcneil6, Lisa Hightow-Weidman1, Monique Carry7, Matthew Hogben7, Arlene C Seña1. 1. Division of Infectious Diseases, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA. 2. Department of Sociology, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA. 3. Microsoft Research, Redmond, Washington, USA. 4. London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London,United Kingdom. 5. Division of Public Health, North Carolina Department of Health and Human Services, Raleigh, North Carolina, USA. 6. Section of Infectious Diseases, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, USA. 7. Division of Sexually Transmitted Disease (STD) Prevention, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and syphilis infection continue at disproportionate rates among minority men who have sex with men (MSM) in the United States. The integration of HIV genetic clustering with partner services can provide important insight into local epidemic trends to guide interventions and control efforts. METHODS: We evaluated contact networks of index persons defined as minority men and transgender women diagnosed with early syphilis and/or HIV infection between 2018 and 2020 in 2 North Carolina regions. HIV clusters were constructed from pol sequences collected through statewide surveillance. A combined "HIV-risk" network, which included persons with any links (genetic or sexual contact) to HIV-positive persons, was evaluated by component size, demographic factors, and HIV viral suppression. RESULTS: In total, 1289 index persons were identified and 55% named 1153 contacts. Most index persons were Black (88%) and young (median age 30 years); 70% had early syphilis and 43% had prevalent HIV infection. Most people with HIV (65%) appeared in an HIV cluster. The combined HIV-risk network (1590 contact network and 1500 cluster members) included 287 distinct components; however, 1586 (51%) were in a single component. Fifty-five percent of network members with HIV had no evidence of viral suppression. Overall, fewer index persons needed to be interviewed to identify 1 HIV-positive member without viral suppression (1.3 vs 4.0 for contact tracing). CONCLUSIONS: Integration of HIV clusters and viral loads illuminate networks with high HIV prevalence, indicating recent and ongoing transmission. Interventions intensified toward these networks may efficiently reach persons for HIV prevention and care re-engagement.
BACKGROUND: Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and syphilis infection continue at disproportionate rates among minority men who have sex with men (MSM) in the United States. The integration of HIV genetic clustering with partner services can provide important insight into local epidemic trends to guide interventions and control efforts. METHODS: We evaluated contact networks of index persons defined as minority men and transgender women diagnosed with early syphilis and/or HIV infection between 2018 and 2020 in 2 North Carolina regions. HIV clusters were constructed from pol sequences collected through statewide surveillance. A combined "HIV-risk" network, which included persons with any links (genetic or sexual contact) to HIV-positive persons, was evaluated by component size, demographic factors, and HIV viral suppression. RESULTS: In total, 1289 index persons were identified and 55% named 1153 contacts. Most index persons were Black (88%) and young (median age 30 years); 70% had early syphilis and 43% had prevalent HIV infection. Most people with HIV (65%) appeared in an HIV cluster. The combined HIV-risk network (1590 contact network and 1500 cluster members) included 287 distinct components; however, 1586 (51%) were in a single component. Fifty-five percent of network members with HIV had no evidence of viral suppression. Overall, fewer index persons needed to be interviewed to identify 1 HIV-positive member without viral suppression (1.3 vs 4.0 for contact tracing). CONCLUSIONS: Integration of HIV clusters and viral loads illuminate networks with high HIV prevalence, indicating recent and ongoing transmission. Interventions intensified toward these networks may efficiently reach persons for HIV prevention and care re-engagement.
Authors: Paul Shannon; Andrew Markiel; Owen Ozier; Nitin S Baliga; Jonathan T Wang; Daniel Ramage; Nada Amin; Benno Schwikowski; Trey Ideker Journal: Genome Res Date: 2003-11 Impact factor: 9.043
Authors: Rachael M Billock; Kimberly A Powers; Dana K Pasquale; Erika Samoff; Victoria L Mobley; William C Miller; Joseph J Eron; Ann M Dennis Journal: J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr Date: 2019-02-01 Impact factor: 3.731
Authors: Christopher B Hurt; Steve Beagle; Peter A Leone; Alyssa Sugarbaker; Emily Pike; JoAnn Kuruc; Evelyn M Foust; Joseph J Eron; Myron S Cohen; Lisa B Hightow-Weidman Journal: J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr Date: 2012-12-01 Impact factor: 3.731
Authors: Eli S Rosenberg; Gregorio A Millett; Patrick S Sullivan; Carlos Del Rio; James W Curran Journal: Lancet HIV Date: 2014-12 Impact factor: 12.767
Authors: Eli S Rosenberg; David W Purcell; Jeremy A Grey; Abigail Hankin-Wei; Eric Hall; Patrick S Sullivan Journal: Ann Epidemiol Date: 2018-04-30 Impact factor: 3.797
Authors: Carla Tilchin; Christina M Schumacher; Kevin J Psoter; Elizabeth Humes; Ravikiran Muvva; Patrick Chaulk; William Checkley; Jacky M Jennings Journal: Sex Transm Dis Date: 2019-04 Impact factor: 2.830
Authors: Dustin T Duncan; DeMarc A Hickson; William C Goedel; Denton Callander; Brandon Brooks; Yen-Tyng Chen; Hillary Hanson; Rebecca Eavou; Aditya S Khanna; Basile Chaix; Seann D Regan; Darrell P Wheeler; Kenneth H Mayer; Steven A Safren; Sandra Carr Melvin; Cordarian Draper; Veronica Magee-Jackson; Russell Brewer; John A Schneider Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2019-05-30 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Austin M Williams; Samuel T Eppink; Jalila N Guy; Arlene C Seña; Andrés A Berruti Journal: Sex Transm Dis Date: 2022-01-10 Impact factor: 3.868