| Literature DB >> 33978064 |
Maylane Tavares Ferreira da Silva1, Alex Cardoso de Melo2, Cristiano Francisco Barros do Nascimento3, Filipi Alexandre do Nascimento Silva4, Talita Banchin Borges5, Ana Maria Quessada6, Marcelo Campos Rodrigues7.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To evaluate hemostasis of the ovarian arteriovenous complex (OAVC) in relation to surgical time, practicality and feasibility in three ovariohysterectomy (OH) techniques for queens.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2021 PMID: 33978064 PMCID: PMC8112102 DOI: 10.1590/ACB360308
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Acta Cir Bras ISSN: 0102-8650 Impact factor: 1.388
Figure 1Three-clamp technique for ovariectomy in a cat. Arrow: ovary; P1: clamp 1, caudal to the ovary; P2: clamp 2, caudal to P1; P3: clamp 3, caudal to P2. The pedicle section will be performed between P1 and P2.
Figure 2Knot-making technique with rotation on own the axis of the ovarian arteriovenous complex of the cat’s ovarian pedicle. (a) Clamping of the suspensory ligament for its section; (b) Rotation of the OAVC on its own axis to obtain the node; (c) After the movement, clamping the OAVC with the tip of the clamp to finish making the knot; (d) Section of the pedicle; (e) Finished node (arrow).
Figure 3Rotation technique on the ovarian arteriovenous complex performed in the ovarian pedicle of a cat. (a) Placement of curved hemostatic forceps transversally to the OAVC; (b) Straight hemostatic forceps placed ventral to the curved forceps; (c) Moment after the ovarian pedicle resection and before the rotation maneuver; (d) Aspect of the rotated stump.
Comparison of ovariohysterectomy techniques in cats (three groups, n = 21). Descriptive and comparative analysis of hematocrit values 24 h before and 48 h after surgery between groups.
| Hematocrit | Groups | Mean (%) | Median (%) | Standard deviation | TTAB | RL (5%) | TCAL |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HT1 | CG | 37.00 | 37.0 | 2.13 | 1.62 | 35.04–38.95 | 2.17 |
| KG | 35.42 | 33.0 | 4.92 | 30.89–39.95 | |||
| CG | 37.00 | 37.0 | 2.13 | 2.17 | 35.04–38.95 | 0.17 | |
| RG | 36.85 | 38.0 | 3.48 | 33.66–40.04 | |||
| KG | 35.42 | 33.0 | 4.92 | 2.17 | 30.89–39.95 | -1.34 | |
| RG | 36.85 | 38.0 | 3.48 | 33.66–40.04 | |||
| HT2 | CG | 30.85 | 33.0 | 2.64 | 2.17 | 28.41–33.29 | -3.33 |
| KG | 34.42 | 36.0 | 5.92 | 28.96–39.88 | |||
| CG | 30.85 | 33.0 | 2.64 | 2.17 | 28.41–33.29 | -3.65 | |
| RG | 33.85 | 36.0 | 2.41 | 31.63–36.07 | |||
| KG | 34.42 | 36.0 | 5.92 | 2.17 | 28.96–39.88 | 0.54 | |
| RG | 33.85 | 36.0 | 2.41 | 31.63–36.07 |
HT1 - hematocrit 24 h before surgery; HT2 - hematocrit 48 h after surgery; CG - conventional technique; KG - knotting technique; RG - rotation technique; RL (5%) - reliability limit; TCAL - calculated T value; TTAB - tabulated T value.