Chelsea A Pelletier1, Nicole White2, Annie Duchesne3, Larine Sluggett4. 1. School of Health Sciences, University of Northern British Columbia, 3333 University Way, Prince George, British Columbia, V2N 4Z9, Canada. chelsea.pelletier@unbc.ca. 2. School of Health Sciences, University of Northern British Columbia, 3333 University Way, Prince George, British Columbia, V2N 4Z9, Canada. 3. Department of Psychology, University of Northern British Columbia, Prince George, Canada. 4. University of Northern British Columbia, Prince George, Canada.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: The goal of this study was to compare the odds of meeting physical activity (PA) guidelines among adults living in rural and urban areas of Canada. METHODS: Data from the 2017 cycle of the Canadian Community Health Survey were analyzed using binomial logistic regression with a sample of 47,266 adults representing a survey-weighted total of 25,669,018. The odds of meeting PA guidelines were determined based on self-reported moderate-to-vigorous PA (<150 min per week or ≥150 min per week). Communities were categorized as urban or rural based on population size and density. Individual-level correlates included in the model were self-identified sex, age, body mass index, highest level of education, household income, perceived health, and sense of belonging to community. RESULTS: Approximately 56.6% of rural and 59.3% of urban adults reported meeting recommended PA levels when location was examined as a sole predictor. The best-fit model adjusted for all individual-level factors showed a significant sex × location interaction. Males in rural communities were more likely to report meeting PA guidelines (odds = 0.90 or 47.4%) than males in urban areas (odds = 0.78 or 43.8%), whereas females living in rural communities (odds = 0.58 or 36.7%) were less likely to report meeting PA guidelines than females in urban areas (odds = 0.65 or 39.4%). CONCLUSION: The association between rural-urban residence and meeting PA guidelines appears to be contingent on self-identified sex differences. Future work should explore how gender- and location-related variables interact to influence self-reported PA engagement.
OBJECTIVES: The goal of this study was to compare the odds of meeting physical activity (PA) guidelines among adults living in rural and urban areas of Canada. METHODS: Data from the 2017 cycle of the Canadian Community Health Survey were analyzed using binomial logistic regression with a sample of 47,266 adults representing a survey-weighted total of 25,669,018. The odds of meeting PA guidelines were determined based on self-reported moderate-to-vigorous PA (<150 min per week or ≥150 min per week). Communities were categorized as urban or rural based on population size and density. Individual-level correlates included in the model were self-identified sex, age, body mass index, highest level of education, household income, perceived health, and sense of belonging to community. RESULTS: Approximately 56.6% of rural and 59.3% of urban adults reported meeting recommended PA levels when location was examined as a sole predictor. The best-fit model adjusted for all individual-level factors showed a significant sex × location interaction. Males in rural communities were more likely to report meeting PA guidelines (odds = 0.90 or 47.4%) than males in urban areas (odds = 0.78 or 43.8%), whereas females living in rural communities (odds = 0.58 or 36.7%) were less likely to report meeting PA guidelines than females in urban areas (odds = 0.65 or 39.4%). CONCLUSION: The association between rural-urban residence and meeting PA guidelines appears to be contingent on self-identified sex differences. Future work should explore how gender- and location-related variables interact to influence self-reported PA engagement.
Entities:
Keywords:
Built environment; Exercise; Logistic models; Physical activity; Rural health; Urban health
Authors: Rachel C Colley; Gregory Butler; Didier Garriguet; Stephanie A Prince; Karen C Roberts Journal: Health Rep Date: 2018-12-19 Impact factor: 4.796
Authors: Leslie R Carnahan; Kristine Zimmermann; Manorama M Khare; Ellen Paulsey; Yamile Molina; JoEllen Wilbur; Stacie E Geller Journal: Health Educ Res Date: 2018-04-01
Authors: Taru Manyanga; Chelsea Pelletier; Stephanie A Prince; Eun-Young Lee; Larine Sluggett; Justin J Lang Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2022-04-06 Impact factor: 3.390