Qian-Kun Ni1, Guan-Yang Song1, Zhi-Jun Zhang1, Tong Zheng1, Yan-Wei Cao1, Hui Zhang2. 1. Sports Medicine Service, Beijing Jishuitan Hospital, No. 31, Xin Jie Kou East Street, Xi Cheng District, Beijing, China. 2. Sports Medicine Service, Beijing Jishuitan Hospital, No. 31, Xin Jie Kou East Street, Xi Cheng District, Beijing, China. zhui76@126.com.
Abstract
PURPOSE: This study aimed to compare the difference in posterior tibial slope (PTS) measurements based on the full-length and half-length tibial anatomic axes of the same group of patients. It was hypothesized that the obtained PTS values would be affected by the length of tibia chosen during the measurements. METHODS: Full-length true lateral tibia radiographs were obtained for each patient who underwent anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) in our department. PTS measurements were obtained by measuring the angle between the full-length or half-length tibial anatomic axis and an average of the lateral and medial tibial plateau. The anatomic axis was defined as the center of the tibial diaphysis. The PTS measurements from the full-length and half-length true lateral tibia radiographs were obtained and compared. Additionally, the absolute difference and the relationship between the two PTS measurements were calculated and analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 200 ACL-injured patients were included in this study. The average PTS values using the anatomic axis were 15.9 ± 3.7° and 14.1 ± 3.7° on full-length and half-length true lateral tibial radiographs. There was a significant difference between the measurements with the full-length and half-length tibial radiographs (P < 0.01). Additionally, 49.5% (n = 99) of patients had ≥ 2.0° differences between the full-length and half-length anatomic axis PTS measurement techniques; meanwhile, a strong and significant linear relationship (r = 0.95; P < 0.001) was identified between the two PTS measurements. CONCLUSION: There were significant differences and linear relationships between PTS measurements that measured the anatomic axis from full-length and half-length true lateral tibia radiographs. Therefore, the obtained PTS values were strongly associated with the length of tibia chosen during the measurements. Surgeons should pay more attention to the measurement techniques and the tibial length when considering the role of PTS in ACL injury and ACLR failure. Knowledge of the association is very important for calculating potential closing wedge proximal tibial osteotomies to correct excessive PTS in the setting of ACLR failures. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.
PURPOSE: This study aimed to compare the difference in posterior tibial slope (PTS) measurements based on the full-length and half-length tibial anatomic axes of the same group of patients. It was hypothesized that the obtained PTS values would be affected by the length of tibia chosen during the measurements. METHODS: Full-length true lateral tibia radiographs were obtained for each patient who underwent anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) in our department. PTS measurements were obtained by measuring the angle between the full-length or half-length tibial anatomic axis and an average of the lateral and medial tibial plateau. The anatomic axis was defined as the center of the tibial diaphysis. The PTS measurements from the full-length and half-length true lateral tibia radiographs were obtained and compared. Additionally, the absolute difference and the relationship between the two PTS measurements were calculated and analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 200 ACL-injured patients were included in this study. The average PTS values using the anatomic axis were 15.9 ± 3.7° and 14.1 ± 3.7° on full-length and half-length true lateral tibial radiographs. There was a significant difference between the measurements with the full-length and half-length tibial radiographs (P < 0.01). Additionally, 49.5% (n = 99) of patients had ≥ 2.0° differences between the full-length and half-length anatomic axis PTS measurement techniques; meanwhile, a strong and significant linear relationship (r = 0.95; P < 0.001) was identified between the two PTS measurements. CONCLUSION: There were significant differences and linear relationships between PTS measurements that measured the anatomic axis from full-length and half-length true lateral tibia radiographs. Therefore, the obtained PTS values were strongly associated with the length of tibia chosen during the measurements. Surgeons should pay more attention to the measurement techniques and the tibial length when considering the role of PTS in ACL injury and ACLR failure. Knowledge of the association is very important for calculating potential closing wedge proximal tibial osteotomies to correct excessive PTS in the setting of ACLR failures. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.