Carlos Estevez-Fraga1, Francesca Magrinelli1, Davina Hensman Moss1, Eoin Mulroy1, Giulia Di Lazzaro1, Anna Latorre1, Melissa Mackenzie1, Henry Houlden1, Sarah J Tabrizi1, Kailash P Bhatia1. 1. Department of Neurodegenerative Diseases (C.E.-F., D.H.M., S.J.T.), Department of Clinical and Movement Neurosciences (A.L, F.M., E.M., G.D.L., M.M., K.P.B.), and Department of Neuromuscular Disorders (H.H.), UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, United Kingdom; Department of Neurosciences, Biomedicine and Movement Sciences (F.M.), University of Verona, Italy; St George's University of London (D.H.M.), United Kingdom; Department of Systems Medicine (G.D.L.), University of Rome Tor Vergata, Italy; and Pacific Parkinson's Research Centre and Djavad Mowafaghian Centre for Brain Health (M.M.), University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Hexanucleotide repeat expansions (HREs) in C9orf72 are a major cause of frontotemporal dementia (FTD) and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS). We aimed to determine the frequency and phenomenology of movement disorders (MD) in carriers of HRE in C9orf72 through a retrospective review of patients' medical records. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the clinical records of patients carrying a C9orf72 HRE in the pathogenic range and compared the characteristics of patients with and without MD. RESULTS: Seventeen of 40 patients with a C9orf72 HRE had a documented MD. In 6 of 17, MD were the presenting symptom, and in 2 of 17, MD were the sole manifestation of the disease. FTD was present in 13 of 17 patients, ALS in 5 of 17 patients, and 2 of 17 patients did not develop FTD or ALS. Thirteen of 17 patients had more than one MD. The most common MD were parkinsonism and tremor (resembling essential tremor syndrome), each one present in 11 of 17 patients. Distal, stimulus-sensitive upper limbs myoclonus was present in 6 of 17 patients and cervical dystonia in 5 of 17 patients. Chorea was present in 5 of 17 patients, 4 of whom showed marked orofacial dyskinesias. The most frequent MD combination was tremor and parkinsonism, observed in 8 of 17 patients, 5 of whom also had myoclonus. C9orf72 patients without MD had shorter follow-up times and higher proportion of ALS, although these results did not survive the correction for multiple comparisons. CONCLUSIONS: MD are frequent in C9orf72. They may precede signs of ALS or FTD, or even be present in isolation. Parkinsonism, tremor, and myoclonus are most commonly observed.
OBJECTIVE: Hexanucleotide repeat expansions (HREs) in C9orf72 are a major cause of frontotemporal dementia (FTD) and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS). We aimed to determine the frequency and phenomenology of movement disorders (MD) in carriers of HRE in C9orf72 through a retrospective review of patients' medical records. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the clinical records of patients carrying a C9orf72 HRE in the pathogenic range and compared the characteristics of patients with and without MD. RESULTS: Seventeen of 40 patients with a C9orf72 HRE had a documented MD. In 6 of 17, MD were the presenting symptom, and in 2 of 17, MD were the sole manifestation of the disease. FTD was present in 13 of 17 patients, ALS in 5 of 17 patients, and 2 of 17 patients did not develop FTD or ALS. Thirteen of 17 patients had more than one MD. The most common MD were parkinsonism and tremor (resembling essential tremor syndrome), each one present in 11 of 17 patients. Distal, stimulus-sensitive upper limbs myoclonus was present in 6 of 17 patients and cervical dystonia in 5 of 17 patients. Chorea was present in 5 of 17 patients, 4 of whom showed marked orofacial dyskinesias. The most frequent MD combination was tremor and parkinsonism, observed in 8 of 17 patients, 5 of whom also had myoclonus. C9orf72 patients without MD had shorter follow-up times and higher proportion of ALS, although these results did not survive the correction for multiple comparisons. CONCLUSIONS: MD are frequent in C9orf72. They may precede signs of ALS or FTD, or even be present in isolation. Parkinsonism, tremor, and myoclonus are most commonly observed.
The GGGGCC hexanucleotide repeat expansion (HRE) in the C9orf72 gene is the most frequent genetic cause of frontotemporal dementia (FTD) and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS).[1,2] Movement disorders (MD) are frequently observed in C9orf72 HRE carriers,[3] generally alongside the features of FTD or ALS, with parkinsonism being present in up to 40%.[4]The prevalence of C9orf72 HRE in other MD has also been investigated. There is no association between C9orf72 HRE and Parkinson disease[5] or essential tremor syndrome (ETS).[6] Conversely, C9orf72 HRE seems over-represented in corticobasal syndrome (CBS)[7] and is the most frequent Huntington disease phenocopy.[8]In this study, we sought to define the MD associated with HRE in the C9orf72 gene and compared the characteristics of C9orf72 patients with and without MD.
Methods
Standard Protocol Approvals, Registrations, and Patient Consents
All participants were recruited under ethics-approved research protocol (UCLH: 04/N034). Clinical records of all patients with HRE in C9orf72 tested at the National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery between May 2012 and May 2019 were retrospectively reviewed. Filmed patients provided written informed consent before video recording.
Genetic Analysis
Repeat-primed fluorescent PCR (RP-PCR) was performed as previously reported in the study by Renton et al. to test for the presence of an expansion in C9orf72.[1] An ABI (Carlsbad, CA) 3730xl automated sequencer was used for fragment length analysis through capillary electrophoresis. Analysis of RP-PCR electropherograms was performed using Peak Scanner v1.0 (ABI). Expansions with a characteristic sawtooth pattern were put forward for Southern blotting.Southern hybridization[9] was performed by combining the use of a (GGGGCC)5 probe targeting multiple sites within the expansion and genomic DNA digested with 2 frequently cutting restriction endonucleases whose sites closely flanked the repeat region. Expansion size was estimated by interpolation of autoradiographs using a plot of log10 base pair number against migration distance.A minimal size of 30 GGGGCC repeats in the C9orf72 gene was defined as pathogenic.[10] The expansions were classified as “small” if patients had between 30 and 90 GGGGCC repeats and “large” if there were >90 GGGGCC repeats.
Statistical Analysis
Quantitative data were not normally distributed after visual evaluation of the data and using the Shapiro-Wilk test. Statistical testing was subsequently performed using the Mann-Whitney U test. Fisher exact test was used to compare proportions. The results were corrected for multiple comparisons using the Benjamini-Hochberg false discovery rate (FDR), with FDR <0.05 deemed a significant result.Analyses were performed using Stata version 12.0 (StataCorp, College Station, TX).
Data Availability
Anonymized data not published in this article will be available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
Results
Patients
A total of 501 patients underwent C9orf72 HRE testing. Of these, 53 patients had more than 30 repeats. Clinical data were available in 40 of 53 patients. Among the 40 patients with HRE and available data, 17 had MD according to their clinical notes (table 1; figure e-1, links.lww.com/NXG/A394).
Table 1
Clinical Features
Clinical FeaturesPatients who developed MD were referred to the neurology clinics because of either MD (7/17) or cognitive symptoms (9/17), or both (1/17). Genetic analysis of C9orf72 was requested because of the combination of MD and cognitive symptoms (4/17), cognitive symptoms and family history of neurodegenerative conditions (7/17), MD and positive family history (2/17), isolated MD (3/17), and isolated cognitive symptoms (1/17).Among patients with MD and HRE, C9orf72 testing was requested from consultant neurologists from the cognitive (8/17), MD (6/17) general neurology (2/17), and neuromuscular clinics (1/17). Of the 17 patients with C9orf72 HRE and MD, 2 of 17 had small HREs and the remainder had large expansions in C9orf72. Seven of 17 patients (41.18%) were women. Median age at onset in patients with MD was 58 years (range 8–70). A family history of dementia or ALS in first-degree relatives was present in 64.7% of the cases with MD and 69.5% of the cases without MD.
Neuropsychometry
Fourteen of 17 patients with MD had available neuropsychological assessments (table 2). Among them, 10 of 14 presented executive dysfunction and/or memory impairment, whereas 7 of 14 had slow processing speed. Either visuospatial dysfunction, impaired calculation, or attention deficits were present in 2 of 14 patients, whereas 4 of 14 patients had decreased verbal fluency.
Table 2
Neuropsychometry
Neuropsychometry
Neuroimaging
Fifteen of 17 patients had available brain MRI reports. Findings included generalized atrophy in 7 of 15 patients, frontal atrophy in 2 of 15 patients, small vessel disease in 2 of 15 patients, and 1 of 15 patient had midbrain atrophy. The remaining 3 of 15 patients had a normal MRI. No patients exhibited asymmetric atrophy.
Symptom Onset and Progression
MD were the initial disease manifestation in 6 of 17 patients: 1 presented with cerebellar ataxia, 1 with hemichorea, 1 with cervical dystonia, and 3 with parkinsonism. Among the other 11 patients, 8 presented with cognitive symptoms (7 with FTD and 1 with learning disabilities) and 3 had a psychiatric onset (1 recurrent panic attacks, 1 psychotic episode, and 1 schizoid personality disorder). In patients who did not present with MD, median time from first symptom to development of MD was 3.5 years (range 0–11 years).During the follow-up, 10 of 17 patients developed FTD, 2 of 17 developed ALS, and 3 of 17 developed FTD/ALS overlap. The 2 patients who continued to exhibit solely MD features at the last follow-up had the earliest age at onset (AAO).
Movement Disorders
Most patients (13/17) had more than one MD. The most frequent combination was tremor and parkinsonism (8/17 patients), 5 of whom also had myoclonus.Tremor and parkinsonism were equally prevalent MD manifestations in this cohort, each one affecting 11 of 17 patients (table 1; figure 1). Phenomenologically, tremor usually resembled ETS (8/11) as low-amplitude, high-frequency postural and intention tremor affecting the upper limbs symmetrically. Other phenotypes, occasionally overlapping with ETS-like tremor, included “jerky” arm tremor (2/11), rest tremor affecting the arms alone (2/11) or legs with later progression to the arms (3/11), tongue tremor (1/11), and isolated “no-no” head tremor (1/11).
Figure 1
Distribution of Movement Disorders in Patients With Hexanucleotide Repeat Expansions in C9orf72
Parkinsonism was mild in 9 of 11 patients and severe and rapidly progressive in the remaining 2 patients, leading them to become bedbound within a year from onset. Parkinsonism was asymmetric in 6 of 11 patients; 3 of 11 patients received a clinical diagnosis of CBS (video 1, segment 1, links.lww.com/NXG/A396). DaTscan was performed in 3 of 11 patients and was abnormal in all. Levodopa was administered to all 3 patients with abnormal DaTscan, providing subjective benefit in 2. One patient without available DaTscan did not improve with levodopa.Segment 1: a patient presenting with facial hypomimia, bradykinesia, ideomotor apraxia, and stimulus-sensitive distal myoclonus in the upper limbs. Segment 2: a patient showing orofacial dyskinesias, ideomotor apraxia, and chorea in his upper limbs.Download Supplementary Video 1 via http://dx.doi.org/10.1212/000575_Video_1Myoclonus was present in 7 of 17 patients. In most (6/7 patients), this manifested as distal stimulus-sensitive jerks affecting both upper limbs (video 1, segment 1, links.lww.com/NXG/A396), whereas one patient was considered to have isolated myoclonus of the cheek by a MD specialist.Dystonia was observed in 7 of 17 patients during the follow-up. In 5 of 7, it exclusively involved the cervical region, whereas one patient had hemidystonia and another had dystonic posturing of the arms.Five patients had chorea, which was limited to the perioral region in 2 patients, to one hemibody in another, and generalized in 2. There were marked orofacial dyskinesias in 4 of 5 patients with chorea (video 1, segment 2, links.lww.com/NXG/A396) resembling tardive dyskinesia, although only one patient had a previous history of neuroleptic exposure. One patient had prominent appendicular ataxia.Seizures occurred in 4 of 17 patients. Further details are available in the table e-1 (links.lww.com/NXG/A395).
Comparison Between C9orf72 Patients With and Without MD
Patients with HRE and MD (MD+) had a lower proportion of ALS compared with patients with HRE without MD (MD−) (5/17 in MD+ vs 17/23 MD−), a higher proportion of FTD (13/17 MD+ as opposed to 11/23 MD−) and longer median follow-up times (8 years in MD+ compared with 3 years in MD−). Median time from onset to death was longer in the patients with HRE and MD than in those without MD (8 years in MD+ vs 2.5 years in MD−). A family history of neurodegenerative disorders did not differ between cohorts (11/17 MD+ vs 16/23 MD−) (table 3). None of this results survived correction for multiple comparisons at a pFDR = 0.05.
Table 3
Comparison Between Patients With and Without MD
Comparison Between Patients With and Without MD
Discussion
This study examined the MD associated with HRE in C9orf72 and the differences between HRE carriers with and without MD. Our findings suggest that MD are frequent in patients with HRE in C9orf72 and often precede FTD/ALS. Moreover, MD can be the initial or even the sole manifestation of C9orf72 HRE. Consequently, the spectrum of MD may be significantly more diverse than previously appreciated.Tremor and parkinsonism were the most frequent MD in our cohort. Although rest tremor has previously been reported in HRE carriers with parkinsonism, postural and intentional tremor, frequently observed in our study, were only mentioned in one previous study as being rare.[4,8]Parkinsonism is a well-recognized feature of the C9orf72 HRE syndrome, particularly in those with FTD phenotypes. However, in 2 patients, levodopa-unresponsive parkinsonism was the cardinal clinical feature and exhibited a rapidly progressive course, which has not previously been reported.Symmetric, stimulus-sensitive upper limb myoclonus, frequently coexisting with parkinsonism, and chorea with marked orofacial involvement were also a common finding in our cohort.Despite MD being frequent in C9orf72 HRE carriers, the phenotypic manifestations do not fall neatly into other syndromic categories, e.g., progressive supranuclear palsy and multiple system atrophy. It is therefore unlikely that misdiagnosis as neurodegenerative entities other than FTD or ALS would occur.[2] This perhaps explains the low frequency of C9orf72 HRE among patients with clinical diagnoses of other neurodegenerative conditions.[7,11]None of the contrasts between C9orf72 HRE with and without MD survived multiple comparisons correction. This may be related to the small sample sizes in both cohorts (MD+ and MD−), which is inherent to the low frequency of C9orf72 expansions. However, MD were less common in those presenting with ALS phenotypes. This may simply reflect shorter follow-up times and difficulty in identifying certain MD in the context of ALS.[1,2,10] Of note, the 2 sole patients who did not develop FTD or ALS had the earlier AAO, being therefore possible that either of these conditions is developed during the follow-up.Our study has several limitations, mainly derived from its retrospective nature. Video recordings were only available in 2 patients, information about previous medications was not systematically recorded in medical notes, and none of our patients had neurophysiologic studies performed. Furthermore, most of the patients were unable to visit our hospital for a clinical review. Clinical data therefore had to be obtained from the medical record and/or discussion with the treating consultant whenever necessary.Our results suggest that C9orf72-associated MD are clinically heterogeneous and frequently found in combination. ETS-like tremor, parkinsonism, distal myoclonus, chorea with orofacial involvement, and cervical dystonia in the context of familial neurodegenerative conditions should prompt molecular genetic testing of the C9orf72 gene. Further prospective, systematic studies are needed to accurately assess the phenotypic manifestations of C9orf72-associated MD.
Authors: Mariely DeJesus-Hernandez; Ian R Mackenzie; Bradley F Boeve; Adam L Boxer; Matt Baker; Nicola J Rutherford; Alexandra M Nicholson; NiCole A Finch; Heather Flynn; Jennifer Adamson; Naomi Kouri; Aleksandra Wojtas; Pheth Sengdy; Ging-Yuek R Hsiung; Anna Karydas; William W Seeley; Keith A Josephs; Giovanni Coppola; Daniel H Geschwind; Zbigniew K Wszolek; Howard Feldman; David S Knopman; Ronald C Petersen; Bruce L Miller; Dennis W Dickson; Kevin B Boylan; Neill R Graff-Radford; Rosa Rademakers Journal: Neuron Date: 2011-09-21 Impact factor: 17.173
Authors: Ging-Yuek R Hsiung; Mariely DeJesus-Hernandez; Howard H Feldman; Pheth Sengdy; Phoenix Bouchard-Kerr; Emily Dwosh; Rachel Butler; Bonnie Leung; Alice Fok; Nicola J Rutherford; Matt Baker; Rosa Rademakers; Ian R A Mackenzie Journal: Brain Date: 2012-02-17 Impact factor: 13.501
Authors: Jon Beck; Mark Poulter; Davina Hensman; Jonathan D Rohrer; Colin J Mahoney; Gary Adamson; Tracy Campbell; James Uphill; Aaron Borg; Pietro Fratta; Richard W Orrell; Andrea Malaspina; James Rowe; Jeremy Brown; John Hodges; Katie Sidle; James M Polke; Henry Houlden; Jonathan M Schott; Nick C Fox; Martin N Rossor; Sarah J Tabrizi; Adrian M Isaacs; John Hardy; Jason D Warren; John Collinge; Simon Mead Journal: Am J Hum Genet Date: 2013-02-21 Impact factor: 11.025
Authors: Alan E Renton; Elisa Majounie; Adrian Waite; Javier Simón-Sánchez; Sara Rollinson; J Raphael Gibbs; Jennifer C Schymick; Hannu Laaksovirta; John C van Swieten; Liisa Myllykangas; Hannu Kalimo; Anders Paetau; Yevgeniya Abramzon; Anne M Remes; Alice Kaganovich; Sonja W Scholz; Jamie Duckworth; Jinhui Ding; Daniel W Harmer; Dena G Hernandez; Janel O Johnson; Kin Mok; Mina Ryten; Danyah Trabzuni; Rita J Guerreiro; Richard W Orrell; James Neal; Alex Murray; Justin Pearson; Iris E Jansen; David Sondervan; Harro Seelaar; Derek Blake; Kate Young; Nicola Halliwell; Janis Bennion Callister; Greg Toulson; Anna Richardson; Alex Gerhard; Julie Snowden; David Mann; David Neary; Michael A Nalls; Terhi Peuralinna; Lilja Jansson; Veli-Matti Isoviita; Anna-Lotta Kaivorinne; Maarit Hölttä-Vuori; Elina Ikonen; Raimo Sulkava; Michael Benatar; Joanne Wuu; Adriano Chiò; Gabriella Restagno; Giuseppe Borghero; Mario Sabatelli; David Heckerman; Ekaterina Rogaeva; Lorne Zinman; Jeffrey D Rothstein; Michael Sendtner; Carsten Drepper; Evan E Eichler; Can Alkan; Ziedulla Abdullaev; Svetlana D Pack; Amalia Dutra; Evgenia Pak; John Hardy; Andrew Singleton; Nigel M Williams; Peter Heutink; Stuart Pickering-Brown; Huw R Morris; Pentti J Tienari; Bryan J Traynor Journal: Neuron Date: 2011-09-21 Impact factor: 17.173
Authors: Bradley F Boeve; Kevin B Boylan; Neill R Graff-Radford; Mariely DeJesus-Hernandez; David S Knopman; Otto Pedraza; Prashanthi Vemuri; David Jones; Val Lowe; Melissa E Murray; Dennis W Dickson; Keith A Josephs; Beth K Rush; Mary M Machulda; Julie A Fields; Tanis J Ferman; Matthew Baker; Nicola J Rutherford; Jennifer Adamson; Zbigniew K Wszolek; Anahita Adeli; Rodolfo Savica; Brendon Boot; Karen M Kuntz; Ralitza Gavrilova; Andrew Reeves; Jennifer Whitwell; Kejal Kantarci; Clifford R Jack; Joseph E Parisi; John A Lucas; Ronald C Petersen; Rosa Rademakers Journal: Brain Date: 2012-03 Impact factor: 13.501
Authors: Davina J Hensman Moss; Mark Poulter; Jon Beck; Jason Hehir; James M Polke; Tracy Campbell; Garry Adamson; Ese Mudanohwo; Peter McColgan; Andrea Haworth; Edward J Wild; Mary G Sweeney; Henry Houlden; Simon Mead; Sarah J Tabrizi Journal: Neurology Date: 2013-12-20 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: Sonja W Scholz; Elisa Majounie; Tamas Revesz; Janice L Holton; Michael S Okun; Henry Houlden; Andrew B Singleton Journal: Neurobiol Aging Date: 2014-09-06 Impact factor: 4.673
Authors: Karen Nuytemans; Güney Bademci; Martin M Kohli; Gary W Beecham; Liyong Wang; Juan I Young; Fatta Nahab; Eden R Martin; John R Gilbert; Michael Benatar; Jonathan L Haines; William K Scott; Stephan Züchner; Margaret A Pericak-Vance; Jeffery M Vance Journal: Ann Hum Genet Date: 2013-07-12 Impact factor: 1.670
Authors: Lucia V Schottlaender; James M Polke; Helen Ling; Nicola D MacDoanld; Arianna Tucci; Tina Nanji; Alan Pittman; Rohan de Silva; Janice L Holton; Tamas Revesz; Mary G Sweeney; Andy B Singleton; Andrew J Lees; Kailash P Bhatia; Henry Houlden Journal: Neurobiol Aging Date: 2014-08-27 Impact factor: 4.673
Authors: Philip Wade Tipton; Angela B Deutschlaender; Rodolfo Savica; Michael G Heckman; Danielle E Brushaber; Bradford C Dickerson; Ralitza H Gavrilova; Daniel H Geschwind; Nupur Ghoshal; Jonathan Graff-Radford; Neill R Graff-Radford; Murray Grossman; Ging-Yuek R Hsiung; Edward D Huey; David John Irwin; David T Jones; David S Knopman; Scott M McGinnis; Rosa Rademakers; Eliana Marisa Ramos; Leah K Forsberg; Hilary W Heuer; Chiadi Onyike; Carmela Tartaglia; Kimiko Domoto-Reilly; Erik D Roberson; Mario F Mendez; Irene Litvan; Brian S Appleby; Ian Grant; Daniel Kaufer; Adam L Boxer; Howard J Rosen; Brad F Boeve; Zbigniew K Wszolek Journal: Neurology Date: 2022-07-05 Impact factor: 11.800
Authors: Stephen A Goutman; Orla Hardiman; Ammar Al-Chalabi; Adriano Chió; Masha G Savelieff; Matthew C Kiernan; Eva L Feldman Journal: Lancet Neurol Date: 2022-03-22 Impact factor: 59.935
Authors: Igor Stevanovski; Sanjog R Chintalaphani; Hasindu Gamaarachchi; James M Ferguson; Sandy S Pineda; Carolin K Scriba; Michel Tchan; Victor Fung; Karl Ng; Andrea Cortese; Henry Houlden; Carol Dobson-Stone; Lauren Fitzpatrick; Glenda Halliday; Gianina Ravenscroft; Mark R Davis; Nigel G Laing; Avi Fellner; Marina Kennerson; Kishore R Kumar; Ira W Deveson Journal: Sci Adv Date: 2022-03-04 Impact factor: 14.136
Authors: Alma Osmanovic; Isabel Gogol; Helge Martens; Maylin Widjaja; Kathrin Müller; Olivia Schreiber-Katz; Friedrich Feuerhake; Claus-Dieter Langhans; Gunnar Schmidt; Peter M Andersen; Albert C Ludolph; Jochen H Weishaupt; Frank Brand; Susanne Petri; Ruthild G Weber Journal: Genes (Basel) Date: 2021-12-29 Impact factor: 4.096