| Literature DB >> 33976713 |
Claude Bragard, Katharina Dehnen-Schmutz, Francesco Di Serio, Marie-Agnès Jacques, Josep Anton Jaques Miret, Annemarie Fejer Justesen, Alan MacLeod, Christer Sven Magnusson, Panagiotis Milonas, Juan A Navas-Cortes, Stephen Parnell, Roel Potting, Philippe Lucien Reignault, Hans-Hermann Thulke, Wopke Van der Werf, Antonio Vicent Civera, Jonathan Yuen, Lucia Zappalà, Andrea Battisti, Hugo Mas, Daniel Rigling, Paolo Gonthier.
Abstract
The European Commission requested the EFSA Panel on Plant Health to prepare and deliver risk assessments for commodities listed in Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/2019 as 'High risk plants, plant products and other objects'. Taking into account the available scientific information, including the technical information provided by the applicant country, this Scientific Opinion covers the plant health risks posed by the following commodities: dormant, free of leaves grafted plants and rootstocks of Juglans regia imported from Moldova. A list of pests potentially associated with the commodities was compiled. The relevance of any pest was assessed based on evidence following defined criteria. None of the pests in the list fulfilled all relevant criteria and therefore none were selected for further evaluation. As a result, risk mitigation measures proposed in the technical dossier from Moldova were listed, but not further evaluated.Entities:
Keywords: European Union; Juglans regia; grafted plants; plants for planting; rootstocks; walnut
Year: 2021 PMID: 33976713 PMCID: PMC8100947 DOI: 10.2903/j.efsa.2021.6570
Source DB: PubMed Journal: EFSA J ISSN: 1831-4732
Structure and overview of the Dossier
| Dossier section | Overview of contents | Filename |
|---|---|---|
| 1.0 | Technical dossier | Annex 2.pdf_Juglans L._EN |
| 2.0 | Appendix A – Checklist of the data providedAppendix B – Sources of information | Annex 4.pdf_MD‐20‐06‐24‐ARES 3479472_Add info Juglans_Malus |
| 3.0 | Additional information received on 18 January 2021 | ADDITIONAL INFORMATION Juglans regia for R. Moldova – 15.01.2021 |
| 4.0. | Clarification on pests status for selected pests received on 3 February 2021 | EFSA depistarea organismelor 03.02.2021.docx |
Databases used by EFSA for the compilation of the pest list associated with Juglans and Juglans regia
| Database | Platform / Link |
|---|---|
| Aphids on World Plants |
|
| CABI Crop Protection Compendium |
|
| Database of Insects and Their Food Plants |
|
| Database of plant pests in Israel |
|
| Database of the World's Lepidopteran Hostplants |
|
| EPPO Global Database |
|
| EUROPHYT |
|
| Leaf‐miners |
|
| Nemaplex |
|
| New Zealand Fungi |
|
| NZFUNGI ‐ New Zealand Fungi(and Bacteria) |
|
| Plant Pest Information Network New Zealand |
|
| Plant Viruses Online |
|
| Scalenet |
|
| Spider Mites Web |
|
| TRACES |
|
| USDA ARS Fungi Database |
|
| Web of Science: All Databases(Web of Science Core Collection, CABI: CAB Abstracts, BIOSIS Citation Index, Chinese Science Citation Database, Current Contents Connect, Data Citation Index, FSTA, KCI‐Korean Journal Database, Russian Science Citation Index, MEDLINE, SciELO Citation Index, Zoological Record) | Web of Science |
| World Agroforestry |
|
Overview of the evaluation of the 26 EU quarantine pest species known to use Juglans regia or Juglans as a host plant for their relevance for this Opinion
| N | Pest name according to EU legislation | EPPO Code | Group | Pest present in Moldova |
| Pest can be associated with commodity | Pest relevant for the Opinion |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
| ANSTFR | Insects | No | Yes(CABI, | Not evaluated | No |
| 2 |
| ANSTLU | Insects | No | Yes(EPPO, | Not evaluated | No |
| 3 |
| ANOLCN | Insects | No | Yes, as | Not evaluated | No |
| 4 |
| AROMBU | Insects | No | Yes(CABI, | Not evaluated | No |
| 5 |
| DACUTR | Insects | No | Yes(CABI, | Not evaluated | No |
| 6 |
| XYLSMU | Insects | No | Yes, as | Not evaluated | No |
| 7 |
| EUWAWH, EUWAKU | Insects | No | Yes, as | Not evaluated | No |
| 8 |
| XYLBVA | Insects | No | Yes, as | Not evaluated | No |
| 9 |
| GEOHMO | Fungi | No | Yes(CABI, | Not evaluated | No |
| 10 |
| GYMNLI | Fungi | No | Yes, as | Not evaluated | No |
| 11 |
| HYOTER | Insects | No | Yes(Wen‐tian, | Not evaluated | No |
| 12 |
| LOPLJA | Insects | No | Yes( | Not evaluated | No |
| 13 |
| MNTHMA | Insects | No | Yes(EPPO, | Not evaluated | No |
| 14 |
| OEMOHI | Insects | No | Yes, as | Not evaluated | No |
| 15 |
| PHMPOM | Fungi | No | Yes(CABI, | Not evaluated | No |
| 16 |
| PITOJU | Insects | No | Yes(CABI, | Not evaluated | No |
| 17 |
| POPIJA | Insects | No | Yes, as | Not evaluated | No |
| 18 |
| RHAGSU | Insects | No | Yes(EPPO, | Not evaluated | No |
| 19 |
| ‐ | Insects | No | Yes(Sharma et al., | Not evaluated | No |
| 20 |
| LAPHFR | Insects | No | Yes(EPPO, | Not evaluated | No |
| 21 |
| ARGPLE | Insects | No | Yes(EPPO, | Not evaluated | No |
| 22 |
| THAUPR | Insects | Yes | Yes(Robinson et al., | No | No |
| 23 |
| XIPHAA | Nematodes | No | Yes(CABI, | Not evaluated | No |
| 24 |
| XIPHRI | Nematodes | No | Yes, as | Not evaluated | No |
| 25 |
| XYBIAR | Insects | No | Yes(EPPO, | Not evaluated | No |
| 26 |
| XYLEFA | Bacteria | No | Yes(EPPO, | Not evaluated | No |
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/2072.
The question if the pest can be associated with the commodity is evaluated only if the questions on the presence in Moldova were answered with ‘yes’.
The pest it is not associated with the commodity because there is no oviposition on small plants of walnut.
Overview of proposed risk mitigation measures for J. regia plants designated for export to the EU from Moldova
| N | Risk mitigation measure | Implementation in Moldova |
|---|---|---|
| 1 |
| Details of pesticide treatments are described in Table E1 in the Dossier Section 1.0.
The measures are specific against following pests:
|
| 2 |
| Details of other mitigation measures (other than pesticides) are described in Table E2 in the Dossier Section 1.0.
The measures are specific against following pests:
|
| Web of Science All Databases |
|