BACKGROUND: CHA2DS2-VASc score is a useful score to evaluate the risk of stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF), and it has been shown to outperform CHADS2 score. Our recent cross-sectional study showed that CHA2DS2-VASc score was associated with an ankle-brachial index < 0.9. The aim of the current study was to evaluate whether CHA2DS2-VASc score is a useful predictor of new-onset peripheral artery occlusive disease (PAOD) and whether it can outperform CHADS2 and R2CHADS2 scores. METHODS: We used the National Health Insurance Research Database to survey 723750 patients from January 1, 2000 to December 31, 2001. CHADS2, R2CHADS2, and CHA2DS2-VASc scores were calculated for every patient. Finally, 280176 (score 0), 307209 (score 1), 61093 (score 2), 35594 (score 3), 18956 (score 4), 11032 (score 5), 6006 (score 6), 2696 (score 7), 843 (score 8), and 145 (score 9) patients were studied and followed to evaluate new-onset PAOD. We further divided the study patients into six groups: group 1 (score 0), group 2 (score 1-2), group 3 (score 3-4), group 4 (score 5-6), group 5 (score 7-8), and group 6 (score 9). RESULTS: Overall, 24775 (3.4%) patients experienced new-onset PAOD during 9.8 years of follow-up. The occurrence rate of PAOD increased from 1.3% (group 1) to 23.4% (group 6). Subgroup analysis by gender also showed an association between CHA2DS2-VASc score and the occurrence rate of PAOD. After multivariate analysis, groups 2-6 were significantly associated with new-onset PAOD. CHA2DS2-VASc score also outperformed CHADS2 and R2CHADS2 scores for predicting new-onset PAOD. CONCLUSIONS: CHA2DS2-VASc score was a more powerful predictor of new-onset PAOD than CHADS2 and R2CHADS2 scores in patients without AF.
BACKGROUND: CHA2DS2-VASc score is a useful score to evaluate the risk of stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF), and it has been shown to outperform CHADS2 score. Our recent cross-sectional study showed that CHA2DS2-VASc score was associated with an ankle-brachial index < 0.9. The aim of the current study was to evaluate whether CHA2DS2-VASc score is a useful predictor of new-onset peripheral artery occlusive disease (PAOD) and whether it can outperform CHADS2 and R2CHADS2 scores. METHODS: We used the National Health Insurance Research Database to survey 723750 patients from January 1, 2000 to December 31, 2001. CHADS2, R2CHADS2, and CHA2DS2-VASc scores were calculated for every patient. Finally, 280176 (score 0), 307209 (score 1), 61093 (score 2), 35594 (score 3), 18956 (score 4), 11032 (score 5), 6006 (score 6), 2696 (score 7), 843 (score 8), and 145 (score 9) patients were studied and followed to evaluate new-onset PAOD. We further divided the study patients into six groups: group 1 (score 0), group 2 (score 1-2), group 3 (score 3-4), group 4 (score 5-6), group 5 (score 7-8), and group 6 (score 9). RESULTS: Overall, 24775 (3.4%) patients experienced new-onset PAOD during 9.8 years of follow-up. The occurrence rate of PAOD increased from 1.3% (group 1) to 23.4% (group 6). Subgroup analysis by gender also showed an association between CHA2DS2-VASc score and the occurrence rate of PAOD. After multivariate analysis, groups 2-6 were significantly associated with new-onset PAOD. CHA2DS2-VASc score also outperformed CHADS2 and R2CHADS2 scores for predicting new-onset PAOD. CONCLUSIONS: CHA2DS2-VASc score was a more powerful predictor of new-onset PAOD than CHADS2 and R2CHADS2 scores in patients without AF.
Authors: Christine C Welles; Mary A Whooley; Beeya Na; Peter Ganz; Nelson B Schiller; Mintu P Turakhia Journal: Am Heart J Date: 2011-08-09 Impact factor: 4.749
Authors: Paulus Kirchhof; Stefano Benussi; Dipak Kotecha; Anders Ahlsson; Dan Atar; Barbara Casadei; Manuel Castella; Hans-Christoph Diener; Hein Heidbuchel; Jeroen Hendriks; Gerhard Hindricks; Antonis S Manolis; Jonas Oldgren; Bogdan Alexandru Popescu; Ulrich Schotten; Bart Van Putte; Panagiotis Vardas Journal: Eur Heart J Date: 2016-08-27 Impact factor: 29.983
Authors: Dominic P J Howard; Amitava Banerjee; Jack F Fairhead; Linda Hands; Louise E Silver; Peter M Rothwell Journal: Circulation Date: 2015-09-08 Impact factor: 29.690