| Literature DB >> 33976495 |
Bhavna Sabbarwal1, Manjunath P Puranik2, S R Uma2.
Abstract
AIM: Parental behavior is known to influence the well-being and disease outcomes in children. The environment which they create for the child can influence oral health behaviors and status. Hence, the present study aimed to determine the association of parental behavior with oral health status among 3-5-year-old children in Bengaluru city.Entities:
Keywords: Child; Dental caries; Oral health; Oral hygiene; Parental behavior; Parenting style.
Year: 2020 PMID: 33976495 PMCID: PMC8060931 DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10005-1856
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Clin Pediatr Dent ISSN: 0974-7052
Distribution of the study participants according to demographic factors and parenting style (N = 300)
| Age[ | 3 | 37 (12.3) | 7 (2.3) | 18 (6.0) | 62 (20.7) |
| 4 | 89 (29.7) | 13 (4.3) | 28 (9.3) | 130 (43.3) | |
| 5 | 66 (22.0) | 10 (3.3) | 32 (10.7) | 108 (36.0) | |
| Gender[ | Males | 113 (37.7) | 19 (6.3) | 41 (13.7) | 173 (57.7) |
| Females | 79 (26.3) | 11 (3.7) | 37 (12.3) | 127 (42.3) | |
p = 0.88
p = 0.51
Mean caries experience (dmft) among study participants according to parenting style
| dt[ | 1.40 ± 1.90 | 2.03 ± 1.59 | 4.12 ± 3.28[ | 2.17 ± 2.59 |
| mt | 0.02 ± 0.14 | 0.07 ± 0.25 | 0.04 ± 0.19 | 0.03 ± 0.17 |
| ft | 0.08 ± 0.40 | 0 | 0.10 ± 0.38 | 0.08 ± 0.38 |
| dmft[ | 1.51 ± 1.94 | 2.1 ± 1.67 | 4.25 ± 3.43[ | 2.28 ± 2.66 |
Statistical significance among the groups (p < 0.001)
Statistical significance among authoritative and permissive (p < 0.001)
Statistical significance among authoritarian and permissive (p < 0.001)
Association between oral health conditions and parenting styles among study participants
| Dental caries experience[ | Present | 88 (29.3) | 27 (9.0) | 68 (22.7) | 183 (61.0) |
| Absent | 104 (34.7) | 3 (1.0) | 10 (3.3) | 117 (39.0) | |
| Dental trauma[ | Present | 7 (2.3) | 3 (1.0) | 9 (3.0) | 19 (6.3) |
| Absent | 185 (61.7) | 27 (9.0) | 69 (23.0) | 281 (93.7) | |
| Oral mucosal lesions[ | Present | 6 (2.0) | 0 (0) | 3 (1.0) | 9 (3.0) |
| Absent | 186 (62.0) | 30 (10.0) | 75 (25.0) | 291 (97.0) | |
p < 0.001
p = 0.04
p = 0.57
Distribution of study participants according to urgent needs of a different intervention and parenting style
| No treatment | 68 (22.7) | 3 (1.0) | 6 (2.0) | 77 (25.7) |
| Preventive/routine treatment | 33 (11.0) | 7 (2.3) | 8 (2.7) | 48 (16.0) |
| Prompt treatment | 81 (27.0) | 16 (5.3) | 48 (16.0) | 145 (48.3) |
| Immediate treatment | 10 (3.3) | 4 (1.3) | 16 (5.3) | 30 (10.0) |
| Referred for comprehensive evaluation | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) |
| Total | 192 (64.0) | 30 (10.0) | 78 (26.0) | 300 (100.0) |