| Literature DB >> 33976487 |
Neenu Sukumaran1, Vasudha Sharma2, Padma K Bhat2.
Abstract
AIM: Preschool is the time when deleterious oral habits, caries pattern, and risk factor are established and is the time to intervene and establish healthy trends which can have a lifelong influence. Individuals living in various socioeconomic conditions have an assortment of hazard factors that impact oral well-being. This work was conducted to study the prevalence of dental caries, body mass index (BMI), and socioeconomic status (SES) among preschoolers in private preschools and Anganwadi centers within Bengaluru.Entities:
Keywords: Anganwadi; Body mass index; Comparative study; Dental caries; Preschool; Socioeconomic status.
Year: 2020 PMID: 33976487 PMCID: PMC8060947 DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10005-1848
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Clin Pediatr Dent ISSN: 0974-7052
Distribution of study participants based on their age and sex
| Age | 3 years | 165 | 41.3 | 204 | 51.0 |
| 4 years | 158 | 39.5 | 144 | 36.0 | |
| 5 years | 75 | 19.25 | 52 | 13.0 | |
| Total | 400 | 50.0 | 400 | 50.0 | |
| Sex | Male | 180 | 45.0 | 193 | 48.3 |
| Female | 220 | 55.0 | 207 | 51.7 | |
| Total | 800 | 50.0 | 800 | 50.0 | |
Comparison of distribution of anganwadi and private school children based on their family income and socioeconomic status
| Family income | ≤Rs. 2164 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0.0 | 785.661 | <0.001[ |
| Rs. 2165–6430 | 186 | 46.5 | 0 | 0.0 | |||
| Rs. 6431–10718 | 188 | 47.0 | 0 | 0.0 | |||
| Rs. 10719–16077 | 22 | 5.5 | 0 | 0.0 | |||
| Rs. 16078–21437 | 2 | 0.5 | 8 | 2.0 | |||
| Rs. 21438–42875 | 0 | 0.0 | 132 | 33.0 | |||
| ≥Rs. 42876 | 2 | 0.5 | 260 | 65.0 | |||
| SES | Lower class | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0.0 | 769.525 | <0.001[ |
| Upper lower | 306 | 76.5 | 0 | 0.0 | |||
| Middle class | 92 | 23.0 | 6 | 1.5 | |||
| Upper middle | 2 | 0.5 | 287 | 71.8 | |||
| Upper class | 0 | 0.0 | 107 | 26.8 | |||
χ2: Chi-square test
p value <0.05
Comparison of mean dmft/dmfs scores between anganwadi and private preschool children
| d (t) | Anganwadi | 400 | 1.57 | 2.66 | 0.13 | 0.51 | −2.958 | 0.003[ |
| Private school | 400 | 1.06 | 2.21 | 0.11 | ||||
| m (t) | Anganwadi | 400 | 0.04 | 0.22 | 0.01 | 0.01 | −1.806 | 0.07 |
| Private school | 400 | 0.03 | 0.38 | 0.02 | ||||
| f (t) | Anganwadi | 400 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | −0.08 | −4.165 | <0.001[ |
| Private school | 400 | 0.08 | 0.37 | 0.02 | ||||
| dmft | Anganwadi | 400 | 1.60 | 2.74 | 0.14 | 0.44 | −2.570 | 0.01[ |
| Private school | 400 | 1.16 | 2.34 | 0.12 | ||||
| d (s) | Anganwadi | 400 | 2.89 | 5.22 | 0.26 | 1.28 | −3.089 | 0.002[ |
| Private school | 400 | 1.61 | 3.47 | 0.17 | ||||
| m (s) | Anganwadi | 400 | 0.16 | 1.00 | 0.05 | 0.14 | −2.523 | 0.01[ |
| Private school | 400 | 0.02 | 0.27 | 0.01 | ||||
| f (s) | Anganwadi | 400 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | −0.14 | −4.165 | <0.001[ |
| Private school | 400 | 0.14 | 0.74 | 0.04 | ||||
| dmfs | Anganwadi | 400 | 3.05 | 5.70 | 0.29 | 1.29 | −2.832 | 0.005[ |
| Private school | 400 | 1.76 | 3.71 | 0.19 |
SD: Standard deviation; Z: Mann–Whitney U test
p value <0.05
Fig. 1Comparison of mean BMI scores between Anganwadi and private school children; weight t = −5.587; p ≤ 0.001; height t = −1.313; p = 0.19; BMI t = 4.377; p ≤ 0.001
Fig. 2Scatterplot depicting the relationship between dental decay and BMI scores among Anganwadi and Pvt. school children; BMI: dmfs, r = −0.21; p ≤ 0.001; r = correlation coefficient