| Literature DB >> 33976240 |
Daniela Kameke1, Helge Kampen2, Alexander Wacker3, Doreen Werner4.
Abstract
Culicoides are vectors of pathogens mainly of veterinary importance. To establish targeted vector control measures, it is paramount to comprehend the ecological factors determining their distribution. Therefore, we used emergence traps to sample eight biotopes and assess their potential as breeding sites. Part one of the study investigates agricultural habitats, part two compares four biotopes of a forest-dominated area with less anthropogenic influence, including a physicochemical analysis of soil moisture, pH value and organic content. Thirteen culicoid species were collected, with a strong dominance of the Obsoletus Complex on meadows, and with Culicoides punctatus (MEIGEN), Culicoides pictipennis (STAEGER) and the Obsoletus Complex, to be the most abundant species in the natural habitats. Several co-existing species were found, some of them not having been described before. Our results suggest that ungrazed meadows seem unsuitable as breeding sites. Only the influence of livestock creates adequate conditions for certain midge species. The alder on fen site contained most culicoid species with the highest species diversity. Our study clearly indicates that knowledge of species-specific preferences for environmental habitat conditions (choice of breeding site) in connection to soil conditions is crucial to understand the biology and phenology of midges and their role as vectors of pathogens.Entities:
Year: 2021 PMID: 33976240 PMCID: PMC8113236 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-86163-9
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Details of sampling activities during 2014 including sampling periods, sampling sites with corresponding number of valid samples and substrate analysis.
| Biotopes | Sampling period | No. of samples | Coordinates | Soil analysis |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ungrazed meadow | April–early Aug | 44 | N 52.761 | |
| E 14.306 | ||||
| Meadow with cattle | April–late July | 30 | N 52.763 | |
| E 14.300 | ||||
| Meadow with cattle | Aug–Oct | 28 | N 52.543 | |
| E 14.201 | ||||
| Meadow with sheep | Aug–Oct | 35 | N 52.502 | |
| E 14.129 | ||||
| Coniferous woodland | April–Oct | 109 | N 52.991 | Moisture, pH, organic content |
| E 12.908 | ||||
| Deciduous woodland | April–Oct | 103 | N 52.991 | Moisture, pH, organic content |
| E 12.90 | ||||
| Alder on fen site | April–Oct | 100 | N 52.991 | Moisture, pH, organic content |
| E 12.907 | ||||
| Marsh area (grassland) | April–Oct | 98 | N 52.992 | Moisture, pH, organic content |
| E 12.903 | ||||
Figure 1Composition of ceratopogonids sampled in all study sites.
Total numbers of Culicoides spp. and gender composition from all study sites.
| Species | Males | Females | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| Obsoletus complex | 12 | 33 | 45 |
| incl. | 8 | 0 | 8 |
| incl. | 2 | 3 | 5 |
| 0 | 1 | 1 | |
| 1 | 7 | 8 | |
| 0 | 1 | 1 | |
| 0 | 7 | 7 | |
| 2 | 5 | 7 | |
| 0 | 3 | 3 | |
| 0 | 2 | 2 | |
| 5 | 4 | 9 | |
| 4 | 0 | 4 | |
| 5 | 5 | 10 | |
| 0 | 1 | 1 | |
| 0 | 1 | 1 | |
| Total | 29 | 70 | 99 |
Quantitative composition of culicoid biting midges per biotope.
| Biotope | No. of samples | No. of specimens | No. of specimens per sample | No. of species |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ungrazed meadow | 44 | 0 | 0.00 | 0 |
| Meadow with cattle | 30 | 25 | 0.83 | 2 |
| Meadow with cattle | 28 | 6 | 0.21 | 1 |
| Meadow with sheep | 35 | 2 | 0.06 | 1 |
| Coniferous woodland | 109 | 8 | 0.07 | 4 |
| Alder on fen site | 100 | 40 | 0.40 | 10 |
| Deciduous woodland | 103 | 12 | 0.12 | 4 |
| Marsh area | 98 | 6 | 0.06 | 4 |
| Total/mean | Σ 547 | Σ 99 | Ø 0.22 | Ø 3.3 |
Number of collected culicoid species per biotope and sample.
| Marsh area | Alder on fen site | Deciduous woodland | Coniferous woodland | Meadow (ungrazed) | Meadow (cattle) | Meadow (sheep) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0.00 | 0.01 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | |
| 0.00 | 0.06 | 0.02 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | |
| 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.02 | 0.00 | |
| 0.00 | 0.03 | 0.01 | 0.03 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | |
| 0.00 | 0.05 | 0.00 | 0.02 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | |
| 0.01 | 0.02 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | |
| Obsoletus Complex | 0.02 | 0.08 | 0.01 | 0.02 | 0.00 | 0.52 | 0.06 |
| 0.02 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | |
| 0.00 | 0.01 | 0.08 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | |
| 0.00 | 0.04 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | |
| 0.00 | 0.09 | 0.00 | 0.01 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | |
| 0.01 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | |
| 0.00 | 0.01 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | |
| midges per sample and biotope | 0.06 | 0.40 | 0.12 | 0.07 | 0.00 | 0.53 | 0.06 |
Figure 2All box plots (a–c) comprise 25th and 75th percentiles (whisker box) and include the median (central line). Error bars represent 10th and 90th percentiles, with the dots delineating minimum and maximum data points. (a) Boxplots of the soil moisture factors measured in the four biotopes (CW Coniferous woodland, AFS Alder on fen site, DW Deciduous woodland, MA Marsh area) in region 3. (b) Boxplots of the organic contents measured in the four biotopes (CW Coniferous woodland, AFS Alder on fen site, DW Deciduous woodland, MA Marsh area) in region 3 (values between 0–1 correspond to 0–100%). (c) Boxplots of the pH values measured in the four biotopes. (CW Coniferous woodland, AFS Alder on fen site, DW Deciduous woodland, MA Marsh area) in region 3.
Means of each soil factor per biotope.
| Coniferous woodland | Alder on fen site | Deciduous woodland | Marsh area | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Soil moisture | 36.74 | 274.79 | 92.24 | 65.19 |
| pH | 3.27 | 4.79 | 3.38 | 4.53 |
| Organic content | 9 | 36 | 16 | 7 |
Results of the median test on the number of collected Culicoides per biotope.
| Coniferous woodland | Alder on fen site | Deciduous woodland | Marsh area | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| > Median | 3 | 12 | 4 | 3 |
| ≤ Median | 10 | 1 | 9 | 10 |
Biodiversity indices of Shannon–Weaver, Evenness and Simpson index.
| Region 1 | Region 2 | Region 3 | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Meadow with cattle | Meadow with cattle | Meadow with sheep | Coniferous woodland | Deciduous woodland | Alder on fen site | Marsh area | |
| No. of specimens (n) | 25 | 6 | 2 | 8 | 12 | 40 | 6 |
| No. of species (S) | 2 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 4 | 10 | 4 |
| Shannon–Weaver index (H) | 0.24 | 0 | 0 | 1.91 | 1.42 | 2.96 | 1.92 |
| Maximum diversity possible (Hmax) | 1.00 | 0 | 0 | 2.00 | 2.00 | 3.32 | 2.00 |
| Evenness (E) | 0.24 | – | – | 0.95 | 0.71 | 0.89 | 0.96 |
| Simpson index (D) | 0.92 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.18 | 0.44 | 0.13 | 0.13 |
Index numbers and calculated biodiversity indices of Shannon–Weaver index and Simpson index based on Culicoides spp. collected in 2014.
Figure 3Phenology of Culicoides spp. based on all study sites sampled during 2014.
Co-occurrence and species distribution per month and biotope of Culicoides spp. collected during 2014.
| Time of appearance | Coniferous woodland | Deciduous woodland | Alder on fen site | Marsh area |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mid-April | ||||
| Late April | ||||
| Mid-May | Obsoletus Complex | |||
| Late May | Obsoletus Complex | Obsoletus Complex | Obsoletus Complex | |
| Mid-June | Obsoletus Complex | Obsoletus Complex | ||
Obsoletus Complexa | ||||
| Late June | ||||
| Mid-July | ||||
| Late July | ||||
| Mid-Aug | ||||
| Late Aug | ||||
| Mid-Sep | ||||
| Late Sep | ||||
| Mid-Oct |
aSpecies collected in one single sample.