| Literature DB >> 33975538 |
Lucie Kretzler1, Stephan Große2, Stephan Wiedemann2, Carsten Wunderlich2, Chris Nowak2, Christian Riedel2, Tomáš Sieger3, Steffen Schoen2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The study analyzes changes in lung function, pulmonary pressure and diffusing capacity of the lung in patients with mitral valve regurgitation (MR) treated by MitraClip implantation.Entities:
Keywords: MitraClip; Patient registry; Pulmonary function; Structural intervention; Valvular disease
Mesh:
Year: 2021 PMID: 33975538 PMCID: PMC8112049 DOI: 10.1186/s12872-021-02042-1
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Cardiovasc Disord ISSN: 1471-2261 Impact factor: 2.298
Baseline characteristics of patients. Mean values ± standard deviations are given
| Age (years) | 77.6 ± 6.6 |
| Weight (kg) | 79.1 ± 14.7 |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 27.0 ± 4.9 |
| Female gender, n (%) | 18/42(42.9%) |
| NYHA functional class, n (%) | II 1/42(2.4%) |
| III 40/42 (95.2%) | |
| IV 1/42 (2.4%) | |
| Etiology of the MR, n (%) | (1) Primary 23/42(54.8%) |
| (2) Secondary 17/42(40.5%) | |
| (3) Mixed 2/42(4.8%) | |
| Chronic obstructive lung disease | 7/42 (16.7%) |
| Asthma bronchiale | 1/42(2.4%) |
| LVEF (%) | 48.2 ± 13.4 |
| N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (pg/ml) | 3367.7 ± 4718.0 |
| EURO Score II | 5.0 ± 3.6 |
| Pulmonary artery pressure (mmHg) | 48.8 ± 11.4 |
| Glomerular filtration rate (mL/min/1.73 m2) | 53.2 ± 22.2 |
| Vital capacity (ml/kg) | 85.3 ± 21.8 |
| Left atrial diameter in M-Mode (mm) | 48.1 ± 8.0 |
| Atrial fibrillation (AF), n (%) | 35 (83.3%) |
Fig. 1Echocardiographic assessment of MR severity before and after the MitraClip procedure
Fig. 2Echocardiographic assessment of pulmonary artery pressure (mmHg) before and after the MitraClip procedure. A: The systolic pulmonary artery pressure decreased from 48.8 ± 11.4 mmHg to 42.9 ± 9.0 mmHg, p = 0.01). B: The differences in systolic pulmonary artery pressure. sPAP = pulmonary artery pressure
Fig. 3Diffusing capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide. A: The diffusing capacity did not differ before and after the MitraClip procedure, even though it increased in most patients. B: The differences in the diffusing capacity. DLCO = Diffusing capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide
Fig. 4Diffusing capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide in patients with moderate to severe deterioration of DLCO-values at the baseline (max. 50%). a The diffusing capacity increased after the MitraClip procedure in the patient subgroup. B The differences in the diffusing capacity. DLCO = Diffusing capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide
Fig. 5Improvement in pulmonary artery pressure and diffusing lung capacity after the MitraClip procedure. a The pulmonary artery pressure decreased in patients with DLCO < = 50% as well as in patients with DLCO > 50%. b The diffusing capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide increased in patients with DLCO < = 50%, but not in the other patients. The gray horizontal bars denote mean values in subgroups. sPAP = Systolic pulmonary artery pressure, DLCO = Diffusing capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide
Fig. 6Diffusing capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide correlated with pulmonary artery pressure (p = 0.04). sPAP = Pulmonary artery pressure, DLCO = Diffusing capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide
Estimates of DLCO, VC, TLC, RV and FEV1 in patients with primary and secondary mitral regurgitation before and after the MitraClip procedure. p values are based on Student’s t test with the exception of DLCO, for which it is based on the Wilcoxon exact test due to outlying data values
| Before intervention | After intervention | Difference | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean DLCO (%) | 52.5 ± 16.6 | 53.1 ± 17.8 | 0.6 ± 9.7 | 0.09 |
| Mean VC (ml) | 85.3 ± 21.8 | 86.2 ± 19.0 | 0.9 ± 13.9 | 0.67 |
| Mean TLC (ml) | 99.2 ± 18.5 | 95.8 ± 16.2 | − 3.3 ± 12.7 | 0.10 |
| Mean RV (ml) | 130.0 ± 31.9 | 119.4 ± 29.3 | − 10.3 ± 23.2 | 0.007 |
| Mean FEV1 (ml) | 81.0 ± 24.5 | 80.8 ± 24.7 | − 0.3 ± 12.8 | 0.89 |